United States Confirms: 2014 was Hottest Year on Record - And AK Confirms Conservatives are Retarded

[SheriffJoe]

Sen Rand Paul:

I think this debate has become so dumbed down beyond belief. The Earth is 4.54 or 4.6 billion years old. Anybody who’s ever studied any geology knows that over periods of time, long periods of time, that the climate changes, mmkay? I’m not sure anybody exactly knows why. But we have twenty-, thirty-, hundred-thousand sort of year cycles that go on with the climate. It has been much warmer than it is today. We have real data [for] about 100 years. So somebody tell me what 100 years’ data is in an Earth that is 4.6 billion years old?

My guess is that the conclusions you make from that are not conclusive.

:aktion033

 

[SheriffJoe]

Sen. Ted Cruz:

Other parts are going up. It is not – you know, you always have to be worried about something that is considered a so-called scientific theory that fits every scenario. Climate change, as they have defined it, can never be disproved, because whether it gets hotter or whether it gets colder, whatever happens, they’ll say, well, it’s changing, so it proves our theory. I am always troubled by a theory that fits every perfect situation.

:aktion033

 

[akphidelt]

I love how the conservative argument is that the "climate is always changing" as if scientists do not know this. The only reason we know that it has always changed is from the same people that are telling you why it is changing now, lol. The question scientists ask is, why is it changing, is it volcanic activity, solar flares, etc. Just chalking up climate changes to some mysterious force is as anti-science as it gets. I really hope the future generations are not taught this line of thinking. That if something seems complex that you can't understand it. Southern Conservative science right thurr!!

 

[SheriffJoe]

The Earth was 'warmer' during the Roman Empire. What was the 'cause' behind that, climate nutters? All that methane gas from the animals?

If the Romans had been stupid enough to fund these nutters, "very likely" face)(*^%

This big money anti-science cult is beyond embarrassing.

DEFUND!
DEFUND!
DEFUND!

 

[akphidelt]

The Earth was 'warmer' during the Roman Empire. What 'cause' behind that, climate nutters? All that methane gas from the animals?

"very likely"

This big money cult is embarrassing.

Well something caused it. Just chalking it up to magic is not very scientific, lol. You guys are very dumb people. And very likely is 90-99% confident in the evidence. So people 1000000% smarter than you are 90-99% sure you are dumb. That's statistically significant and very accurate, lol.

 

[JDeuce]

You are just a weird anti-government loon. Nothing you post has anything to do with actual science, just support for your cult and your fight against science and knowledge.

Tell us, Paul, where in the Constitution does it grant the government the authority or responsibility to fund "climate change" studies? Or where in the Constitution "climate change" is discussed at all? It does promote science and knowledge, but doesn't say anything about supplying tax funding to study the weather.

I'm very anti-government when it oversteps its boundaries.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Well something caused it. Just chalking it up to magic is not very scientific, lol. You guys are very dumb people. And very likely is 90-99% confident in the evidence. So people 1000000% smarter than you are 90-99% sure you are dumb. That's statistically significant and very accurate, lol.

Global warming doesn't exist in Canada and Australia right now, only in nut job countries with left wing ideologues in charge who make stupid claims, like "oceans are rising" and "Aspen won't have anymore snow" (parts of the Europe and in the United States).

"Very likely" :>(

You have ZERO scientific evidence, which is why these nutters get defunded when sane people are elected to office.

 

[akphidelt]

Tell us, Paul, where in the Constitution does it grant the government the authority or responsibility to fund "climate change" studies? Or where in the Constitution "climate change" is discussed at all? It does promote science and knowledge, but doesn't say anything about supplying tax funding to study the weather.

I honestly don't care about that. If you are going to leave your ability to understand the Universe and the environment you live in to some 18th century primitive thinking, be my guest. This is like 1% anti-government loon level of thinking. Not even worth the argument.

 

[akphidelt]

Global warming doesn't exist in Canada and Australia right now, only in nut job countries with left wing ideologues in charge who make stupid claims, like "oceans are rising" and "Aspen won't have anymore snow" (parts of the Europe and in the United States).

"Very likely" :>(

You have ZERO scientific evidence, which is why these nutters get defunded when sane people are elected to office.

There's overwhelming scientific evidence. Conservative governments defunding research has nothing to do with evidence. More ideology than anything else. Most of them just don't want to give up the oil money train! Talk about a real agenda, lol!

You can believe your cult leaders, I'll believe the scientists...

The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years.[SUP]1
[/SUP]

Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. Studying these climate data collected over many years reveal the signals of a changing climate.


The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.[SUP]2[/SUP] Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.


Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.[SUP]3[/SUP]

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

 

[akphidelt]

The conservative/big oil argument is no different than the conservative/big tobacco argument. Eventually the scientists and experts will win, since they actually know what they are talking about. But conservatives and Big Oil will put up a big fight, there's no questioning that. There's more money being provided by non-scientific organizations to fighting global warming than there are to research global warming. That's how demented conservatives are.

Absolutely no scientific reasoning behind why they hate global warming. There is a financial reason though.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Nobody gives a fat fuck about your bullshit computer models.

Every time these climate nutters get pinned down on specifics (real life environmental impact) they end up with egg on their faces. Either their 'predictions" are horribly wrong (Aspen snowpack levels; NY and FL will be under water), or they just get caught LYING (Climate Gate, "polar bears will be extinct").

Once people get tired of hearing the sky is falling from Chicken Little, the simple answer is to vote for politicians who will muzzle him. That's what happened in Canada and Australia, and is now slowly happening in the United States.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Obama Claims

In his second-term inaugural address, Obama also made some climate claims, saying: “Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and powerful storms.” Ironically, all three of the examples he provided of what he called the “threat of climate change” actually discredit his argument.

As Forbes magazine pointed out last year, the number of wildfires has plummeted 15 percent since 1950, and according the National Academy of Sciences, that trend is likely to continue for decades. On “droughts,” a 2012 study published in the alarmist journal Naturenoted that there has been “little change in global drought over the past 60 years.” The UN’s own climate alarmists were even forced to conclude last year that in many regions of the world, “droughts have become less frequent, less intense, or shorter.” @)

Regarding hurricanes and tornadoes, it probably would have been hard for Obama to choose a worse example to illustrate the alleged threat of man-made warming. Contrary to predictions by global warmists, hurricanes and tornadoes have been hitting in record-setting low numbers. “When the 2014 hurricane season starts it will have been 3,142 days since the last Category 3+ storm made landfall in the U.S., shattering the record for the longest stretch between U.S. intense hurricanes since 1900, noted professor of environmental studies Roger Pielke, Jr. at the University of Colorado, who last year left alarmists who had predicted more extreme weather linked to alleged global warming silent after pointing out the facts in a Senate hearing. “The five-year period ending 2013 has seen two hurricane landfalls. That is a record low since 1900.” After adjusting the data for trends such as population growth and better reporting, it appears that 2013 also featured the lowest number of tornadoes in the long-term record.

In June 2008, Obama declared: “I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children … this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.” He was referring, of course, to his own election, as if he were some sort of savior here to save humanity from its carbon-climate sins. In the real world, though, despite his grandiose and bombastic view of himself as global climate messiah, Obama has no more power to stop the “climate” from changing than his legions of discredited “experts” have demonstrated to successfully predict it.

Also ironically, perhaps, is that there had been no global warming since long before he took office. Worldwide, the disastrous forecasts by climate alarmists have proven to be similarly embarrassing. By now, anybody who follows “climate” news knows that “global warming” has been on what alarmists call “pause” for 18 years and counting, despite ongoing increases in CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. The stubborn refusal of temperatures to rise (and accelerate) as forecasted by all of the UN’s 73 “climate models” has discredited the models, the UN, and the alleged “science” behind the computer forecasts. Every single model predicted more warming than has occurred, an atrocious record that defies explanation. Even a monkey rolling the dice or a scam artist pretending to read the future from a crystal ball would have a better record, based only on the laws of probability.Loser!@#0

Of course, alarmists have come up with at least a dozen excuses for the failure of temperatures to rise in accordance with their debunked models. The Obama administration’s favorite: the theory of “The Ocean Ate My Global Warming.” :missingte Last year, the Associated Press, citing leaked documents, reported that the U.S. government had pressured the UN IPCC to incorporate that excuse, for which there is not a scintilla of observable evidence, into its most recent global-warming report.

face)(*^%

 

[akphidelt]

Nobody gives a fat fuck about your bullshit computer models.

Every time these climate nutters get pinned down on specifics (real life environmental impact) they end up with egg on their faces. Either their 'predictions" are horribly wrong (Aspen snowpack levels; NY and FL will be under water), or they just get caught LYING (Climate Gate, "polar bears will be extinct").

Once people get tired of hearing the sky is falling from Chicken Little, the simple answer is to vote for politicians who will muzzle him. That's what happened in Canada and Australia, and is now slowly happening in the United States.

Smart people give a shit about computer models. Dumb people don't. Muzzling scientists never works. Science and education always win in the long run! But Big Oil appreciates your support!

 

[JDeuce]

I honestly don't care about that. If you are going to leave your ability to understand the Universe and the environment you live in to some 18th century primitive thinking, be my guest. This is like 1% anti-government loon level of thinking. Not even worth the argument.

It isn't the government's role to do that. But you wouldn't know that, because you've never read the Constitution and have zero conception of how this country was structured.

I guess you'd be all in favor of abolishing free speech as well since that is just 18th century primitive thinking.

If you want the government to fund climate change studies, then that's what the amendment process is for. Two thirds of the house and senate and three fourths of the states are required to enact the change. However, fat idiots like you would much rather our leaders skip all that and fund whatever they like on a whim instead. What the hell is the point of having laws if no one is supposed to follow them?

 

[SheriffJoe]

Smart people give a shit about computer models. Dumb people don't. Muzzling scientists never works. Science and education always win in the long run! But Big Oil appreciates your support!

This is why they deserve muzzling:

The stubborn refusal of temperatures to rise (and accelerate) as forecasted by all of the UN’s 73 “climate models” has discredited the models, the UN, and the alleged “science” behind the computer forecasts. Every single model predicted more warming than has occurred, an atrocious record that defies explanation. Even a monkey rolling the dice or a scam artist pretending to read the future from a crystal ball would have a better record, based only on the laws of probability."

You climate nutters are as useless as two on a bull.Loser!@#0

 

[vitterd]

Notice, you can't quote a single scientist saying it means what you are saying it means.

You have no idea, none, what it means in a scientific context.

Which is why you're answering with non-sequiteors and LMAO

Is there any thread where you don't make a fool of yourself? Thank joe and jdeucebag...they are the only two that make you look less stupid. It is "very likely" you will win another most worthless poll

 

[vitterd]

Smart people give a shit about computer models. Dumb people don't. Muzzling scientists never works. Science and education always win in the long run! But Big Oil appreciates your support!

Purple flowers Joe is a confrimed birther. That disqualfies him on every issue. Someone that stupid should not be allowed to exist.

 

[akphidelt]

Is there any thread where you don't make a fool of yourself? Thank joe and jdeucebag...they are the only two that make you look less stupid. It is "very likely" you will win another most worthless poll

Hahahahaha!! Now that is funny. The dude is so weird, he even thinks there is some mysterious definition of "very likely" that no one understands but him. It's such strange behavior.

 

[akphidelt]

It isn't the government's role to do that. But you wouldn't know that, because you've never read the Constitution and have zero conception of how this country was structured.

I guess you'd be all in favor of abolishing free speech as well since that is just 18th century primitive thinking.

If you want the government to fund climate change studies, then that's what the amendment process is for. Two thirds of the house and senate and three fourths of the states are required to enact the change. However, fat idiots like you would much rather our leaders skip all that and fund whatever they like on a whim instead. What the hell is the point of having laws if no one is supposed to follow them?

Lmao!! Are you still on this Constitution crap? You and your dumbass dad Sheriff Joe need help. No one gives a flying fuck if Global Warming is in the Constitution or not.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Lmao!! I'm a fat ass with no life. I need help. No one gives a flying fuck about Global Warming

:aktion033