United States Confirms: 2014 was Hottest Year on Record - And AK Confirms Conservatives are Retarded

[akphidelt]

Small wonder the liberal arts college flunky is C&P "confidence intervals" links. lol

The difference between trumpeting "HOTTEST YEAR EVER!!" (uhhh, only over the last 100 years) and ending up with egg on their faces as the 'warmers' always do, is hundredths of a degree.

THAT is what the argument is about - nothing.

And yet...

"The best scientists in the world are all telling us that our activities are changing the climate, and if we do not act forcefully, we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger greater migration, conflict, and hunger around the globe.” - Obama's State of Confusion

My "confidence interval" that these radical Marxists are full of shit and that FL will not end up under water is 99.942642783%

Stick that "confidence interval" in your pipe and smoke it, akphi-idiot.

Loser!@#0

You still don't understand what they mean with confidence intervals. You never will. There's just some people that don't have the mental capability of being intelligent. I'll help you out there. I'm like your personal tutor. Technically I should charge you!

 

[SheriffJoe]

The educated. I can understand your confusion. Lot of things must be difficult for you and Canadian Joe to understand. Best stick to birther conspiracies and supporting terrorists.

"educated people making intelligent, informed decisions" LOL

"The best scientists in the world are all telling us that our activities are changing the climate, and if we do not act forcefully, we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger greater migration, conflict, and hunger around the globe.” - Obama's State of Confusion

:missingte

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Sheriff Joe getting mad because I'm abusing him again. Sometimes I feel bad doing it because he simply doesn't know any better. Like dealing with a child. Poor fella.

The only thing you ever abuse is your dick.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Astrophysicist Dr. Dr David Whitehouse: 'The NASA press release is highly misleading...talk of a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.'

Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer: ‘Why 2014 Won’t Be the Warmest Year on Record’ (based on surface data)– ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’

Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels debunks 2014 ‘hottest year’ claim: ‘Is 58.46° then distinguishable from 58.45°? In a word, ‘NO.’

No Record Temperatures According To SatellitesPhysicist Dr. Lubos Motl: ‘Please laugh out loud when someone will be telling you that it was the warmest year’

Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr.: 'We have found a significant warm bias. Thus, the reported global average surface temperature anomaly is also too warm.'

Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: 'With 2014 essentially tied with 2005 and 2010 for hottest year, this implies that there has been essentially no trend in warming over the past decade.'​

Hmmmm....who should we believe, actual scientists, or a liberal arts college flunky?

I know, so difficult. I think I'm going to have to sleep on it, lol.

 

[SheriffJoe]

The only thing you ever abuse is your dick.

Must have been quite the mess during Obama's State of Confusion.

 

[akphidelt]

The only thing you ever abuse is your dick.

Stay classy Dave!

 

[akphidelt]

You guys don't have to worry about this stuff. There are much smarter and better people handling it. Just focus on Benghazi and Solyndra conspiracies. That's your specialty.

 

[SheriffJoe]

 

[SheriffJoe]

You guys don't have to worry about this stuff. There are much smarter and better people handling it. Just focus on Benghazi and Solyndra conspiracies. That's your specialty.

Pretty pathetic that the data is so underwhelming and unconvincing that these clowns are on the defensive about their "confidence intervals"

NASA 'warmer' to other NASA 'warmer': We should have just lied like Gruber did with Obamacare.

"United States confirms: 2014 the Hottest on Record!"

Embarrassing.

face)(*^%

 

[akphidelt]

Pretty pathetic that the data is so underwhelming and unconvincing that these clowns are on the defensive about their "confidence intervals"

NASA 'warmer' to other NASA 'warmer': We should have just lied like Gruber did with Obamacare.

"United States confirms: 2014 the Hottest on Record!"

Embarrassing.

face)(*^%

Pretty pathetic that conservatives are so dumb they don't know what confidence intervals are. NASA does not cater to the stupid. You'd fail a pre-algebra class, trying to understand NASA scientists should be the least of your concerns. You have so much more to worry about that would take a 2nd life to fix. Poor fella. I know you don't mean to be this dumb, you just don't know any better.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Pretty pathetic that conservatives are so dumb they don't know what confidence intervals are. NASA does not cater to the stupid. You'd fail a pre-algebra class, trying to understand NASA scientists should be the least of your concerns. You have so much more to worry about that would take a 2nd life to fix. Poor fella. I know you don't mean bad. You just don't know any better.

Do you really think people are dumb enough to believe you took an "advanced statistic course" when you needed to C&P an explanation for confidence intervals?

 

[SheriffJoe]

Also, tell us again how going to the bank and making a cash withdrawal is "liquidating assets" ointer:

 

[akphidelt]

Do you really think people are dumb enough to believe you took an "advanced statistic course" when you needed to C&P an explanation for confidence intervals?

You guys needed an explanation. You guys still don't get it. That's how dumb you are.

 

[akphidelt]

Also, tell us again how going to the bank and making a cash withdrawal is "liquidating assets" ointer:

Never said that. You're getting desperate. Although I would be too if I was getting beat down as bad as you are. Poor guy. You'll get there.

 

[SheriffJoe]

You guys needed an explanation. You guys still don't get it. That's how dumb you are.

akphi-idiot logic 101:

Claimed to have taken an advanced statistics course -- couldn't explain confidence intervals using his own words.

Another lie by our resident retard? No way!

Loser!@#0

 

[akphidelt]

akphi-idiot logic 101:

Claimed to have taken an advanced statistics course -- couldn't explain confidence intervals in his own words.

Another lie by our resident retard? No way!

Loser!@#0

I did explain it and when you guys still didn't understand it, I quoted the guy who created them letting you know that you guys are retarded. You still don't understand what confidence levels are. That's how dumb you are.

 

[SheriffJoe]

You did no such thing. You Googled the term and then C&P some random link.

Ooooo, we're so impressed, Mister Very, VERY Educated!

"I took an advanced statistics course. Better watch it, this is my area!" -- aaaktard

:missingte

 

[akphidelt]

You did no such thing. You Googled the term and then C&P some random link.

Ooooo, we're so impressed, Mister Very, VERY Educated!

"I took an advanced statistics course. Better watch it, this is my area!" -- aaaktard

:missingte

You keep lying. That's how I know you are desperate. Poor guy. Must suck to be exposed so bad you just make shit up. But I realize you don't know any better.

 

[SheriffJoe]

You keep lying. That's how I know you are desperate. Poor guy. Must suck to be exposed so bad you just make shit up. But I realize you don't know any better.

Not lying at all - just exposing your phony ass like I always do.

akphi-idiot's failed attempt at explaining confidence intervals:

Here's from the mathematician that developed confidence intervals. I'm sure Sheriff Joe's bloggers know more than this guy about what he developed...

A 95% confidence interval does not mean that for a given realised interval calculated from sample data there is a 95% probability the population parameter lies within the interval, nor that there is a 95% probability that the interval covers the population parameter. Once an experiment is done and an interval calculated, this interval either covers the parameter value or it does not, it is no longer a matter of probability. The 95% probability relates to the reliability of the estimation procedure, not to a specific calculated interval.[SUP][11][/SUP] Neyman himself made this point in his original paper:[SUP][3][/SUP]

"It will be noticed that in the above description, the probability statements refer to the problems of estimation with which the statistician will be concerned in the future. In fact, I have repeatedly stated that the frequency of correct results will tend to α. Consider now the case when a sample is already drawn and the calculations have given [particular limits]. Can we say that in this particular case the probability of the true value [falling between these limits] is equal to α? The answer is obviously in the negative. The parameter is an unknown constant and no probability statement concerning its value may be made..

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Like I said, you guys are very dumb people... so you have absolutely no clue what NASA means with the 38% probability. They even tell you that you are misunderstanding them yet you continue to believe your nonsense. It is hilarious how dumb conservatives are.

In other words...

You guys are really dumb.

*insert C&P*

You guys are really dumb.

"I took an advanced statistics course. Better watch it, this is my area!" -- aaaktard

Hilarious.

:hahahahah

 

[akphidelt]

Not lying at all - just exposing your phony ass like I always do.

akphi-idiot's attempt at explain confidence intervals:



In other words...

You guys are really dumb.

*insert C&P*

You guys are really dumb.

Hilarious.

:hahahahah

I already explained it before that and you guys were to dumb to understand it, so I posted a quote from a credible resource. And you still don't understand it. Don't worry though, you don't need to worry about this stuff. Above your pay rate.