But, to quote one of the biggest liberals here: DaFinch... And if one of the most biased liberals on the site can see it, why cant the others?
"Who the fuck are these women? Did they report this story when it happened? No. Did they report it when they moved? No. Did they even report it once he had become a star??? NO, they only felt compelled to comment on it when they wanted to steal an election. Fuck them and the mule they rode in on. Trump denied it, pointing out, among other things, the comment insulted his white ex-wife and children"
None of the above answers my question: if these women was so fucking outraged about what happened, why did they wait umpteen years and, what a coincidence, to the time he was running for prez to reveal this? :ughhh:
How exactly would he prove that? If THAT isn't "he said, she said" I don't know what is.
Nice try. Can you show me where Finchy posted this EXACTLY. I strongly suspect You changed his words, to fit your narrative, and made it appear he said them. I think the mods warned you, and even banned you from Poly, for doing that. It's worse up here, and you really should refrain from that.
As I said to you down in Poly. The same standard applies to the Clinton women, and the Drumpf ones. Drumpf's own surrogates say you have to listen to all women who come forward and say they were sexually assaulted. Oh wait, they only said that about the Slick Willie ones that the idiot Drumpf paraded out before the debate. Hypocrisy abounds.
He said it about people who come out AFTER the fact!
'
'here is the exact quotes:
Quote Originally Posted by raiderhater View Post
Who the fuck is Kittles and Bits? Did he report this story when he was Bonds' teammate? No. Did he report it when he went to another team? No. Did he even report it once he had retired??? NO, he only felt compelledto comment on it when he wanted to sell a book. Fuck him and the mule he rode in on. Bonds denied it, pointing out, among other things, the comment insulted his white ex-wife and children.
Quote Originally Posted by raiderhater View Post
None of the above answers my question: if Kittles was so fucking outraged about what happened, why did he wait umpteen years and, what a coincidence, to the time he was pimping his book to reveal this? :ughhh:
It's unreal, today his mouthpiece ridiculed victims coming out from "decades ago," conveniently forgetting that Rump trotted out 4 people from decades ago in an irrelevant shot at Bill Clinton.
How exactly would he prove that? If THAT isn't "he said, she said" I don't know what is.
Just showing how its the EXACT thing, whats the difference between the 2 cases?
Also, these "Clinton" women came out pretty much after it happened. Yet, all of a sudden there are people coming out from over 30 years ago? One is 74 years old?
Any wager on what party they are registered to? And amount?
There's No Difference between the Slick Willie Cases where women appeared long after the fact, and the Idiot Drumpf's. Unfortunately women who are victims of Sexual assault often hide it in shame, and only when they feel empowered, or something like the Idiot Drumpf's denial at the debate serves as a trigger, and strength in numbers, gets them to come forward. ALL of the Woman the Idiot Drumpf paraded before the debate are supporting him.
You'll have to discuss that with Finchy, preferably downstairs. But there is a difference between Barry Bonds accusers, and victims of sexual assault. As far as I'm concerned, the Slick Willie case and the Drumpf case are the same. Both Sexual Predators. But only one of them is running for POTUS, currently.
. Enjoy your last few days in Poly, Loser. What's the score of the Football game?
Hillary's treatment (response to) some of Bill's Victims needs to find its way onto this table then. That would be relevant to any question of how a candidate has treated women and specifically Victims of Sexual Assault, the Truth to her actual "regard" for such and maybe discussion of her (said) stating that the 12 year old sexual assault victim of that scumbag she defended, chuckilng merrily when recounting that case in an interview...some say Hillary said "She probably provoked it" or some terrible sentiment to that effect, expressing a suspicion that a 12 year old girl getting sexually assaulted could somehow be "her own fault."
