Trump's Florida spokesperson resigns as campaign responds to allegations of Cuba payoffs

Search

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
14492521_976732422453588_7729664965114860756_n.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
It has yet to be determined if he broke the law or not, unlike HRC's situation, so stated by a Republican FBI head-and, trying to play off spending 68 large in a hostile country with a law that's been in place for, at that time, for about 40 years-then lying about it, like scum, right into the faces of Cuban Americans less than a year later(in his FIRST ill fated presidential "run") as not having "intent" is completely and utterly ridiculous.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
It has yet to be determined if he broke the law or not, unlike HRC's situation, so stated by a Republican FBI head-and, trying to play off spending 68 large in a hostile country with a law that's been in place for, at that time, for about 40 years-then lying about it, like scum, right into the faces of Cuban Americans less than a year later(in his FIRST ill fated presidential "run") as not having "intent" is completely and utterly ridiculous.

Hillary got off cause there as no willful intent.... So Trump didn't show any willful intent. So, no law was broken, and no punishment is needed.

Here are Comeys statements on how people cant be convicted of crimes, as long as they just were just ignorant of the law.

"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues **intended** to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

***"Although we did not find clear evidence that Donald Trump or his colleagues intended to violate laws governing the Cuba Emargo, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of trying to find business opportunities there"***


"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"

**Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the Cuba embargo, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into the Cuba emargo we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful wbreaking of the Cuba Emargo; or vast quantities willful lawbreaking in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."****

There was no willful intent, and it only happened just once... and since he is a politician, you also have to give him the benefit of the doubt like they did Clinton. Since (As Comey even said) "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
How did those "Cuba Payoffs" work out for you??

About as well as these "Russian Collusion" things?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Dafinch??? Hello???

Cuba payoffs?? What happened???

Anyone home???
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Helloooooooo??

Why are you ignoring this thread? You seem to respond to the others you create frequently....

Why is this on ignored... along with around 80+ others?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,922
Messages
13,575,250
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com