What crime did she commit and if it was a wrong why isn’t she behind bars now Or at least charged and going thru what DJT went through? It’s all done and over for him and we survived and can now watch DJT use his power. It will be as it always was meant to be.
The Book of Law will be followed for the next 4 years…. Bank on-it!
The Book of Law will be followed for the next 4 years…. Bank on-it!
Okay I used common sense…..
TOTAL DISASTER! Letitia James knows this, but doesn’t care – To her, it’s just a Political Campaign. So sad for our Country,” Trump wrote in September.
We are about to enter a political period that will have consequences for the rest of our lives. We cannot give up,” Ocasio-Cortez noted.
Adding this together “Common Sense” will tell teach them the “Book of Law” is the rule in America. I credit these ladies for their education butt both of them I hope remember the next 4 years are not going to be like the past 4!
This fucken evil cunt and her lawfare bullshit will cost her - most importantly, the 450M judgment looks like it is not getting reduced - IT IS GOING TO $0.00 - in a nutshell, NY has never prosecuted ANYONE where the mortgagee has paid the loan in compliance and in full and the bank said they were happy to to the loan and would do it again
Members of the five-judge panel on the Appellate Division - the mid-level state appellate court hearing arguments in Trump's appeal - appeared concerned about possible overreach by James.
Two of the judges interrupted Judith Vale, the lawyer arguing for New York, during her opening statement to ask if there were any other examples of the state suing over private business transactions between sophisticated parties under a law aimed at protecting market integrity.
"EVERY case that you cite involves damage to consumers, damage to the marketplace," Justice David Friedman told Vale.
"We don't have anything like that here," Friedman added, saying that nobody "lost any money."
The judges also wondered about what constraints applied to the law James cited in bringing the case - one that is typically used to go after fraudsters who target vulnerable consumers.
Members of the five-judge panel on the Appellate Division - the mid-level state appellate court hearing arguments in Trump's appeal - appeared concerned about possible overreach by James.
Two of the judges interrupted Judith Vale, the lawyer arguing for New York, during her opening statement to ask if there were any other examples of the state suing over private business transactions between sophisticated parties under a law aimed at protecting market integrity.
"EVERY case that you cite involves damage to consumers, damage to the marketplace," Justice David Friedman told Vale.
"We don't have anything like that here," Friedman added, saying that nobody "lost any money."
The judges also wondered about what constraints applied to the law James cited in bringing the case - one that is typically used to go after fraudsters who target vulnerable consumers.
This is really good news that our appellate courts (even in the most liberal states) respect law.
The Carroll judgment will be a tougher battle because the trial court did find that he defamed her - of course, the 80M judgment is a fucken hoax but I don't want it reduced to 10M - I want is at $0.00 - I want her cunt attorneys to have worked for 3 years for free
The Carroll judgment will be a tougher battle because the trial court did find that he defamed her - of course, the 80M judgment is a fucken hoax but I don't want it reduced to 10M - I want is at $0.00 - I want her cunt attorneys to have worked for 3 years for free
Fat ass tranny
