Remember, this line was once -600 for the favorite and libtards are soliciting "Trump bets"
@)
Look this guy whose imploring you to bet on the presidential outcome is a little slow on the uptake.
Offering 3 days ago odds +200 is not rational. 5D at this minute is +145: I'd bet myself but my limit
is restricted to $100.
Most bettors can get $500. If $1000 is put up to win 2000 then if I could I'd put 1650 on Clinton
to win $1000 & there would be no risk and a better than 50/50 chance of winning $350.
If 5D would only allow $500 bet I'd decrease the stake to that & still no risk & a good chance at $175.
But will this guy pay on a losing bet that that's the only risk.
Tue 11/8
| 101 Hillary Clinton wins Election | <input id="editx" name="M1_0" size="4"> -165 | ||||||
| 8:00AM | 102 Field wins Presidential Election | <input id="editx" name="M2_0" size="4"> +145 |
<tbody>
</tbody>
| Tue 11/8 | 101 Hillary Clinton wins Election | <input id="editx" name="M1_0" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> -220 | |||||
| 8:00AM | 102 Field wins Presidential Election | <input id="editx" name="M2_0" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> +180 | |||||
| Tue 11/8 | 103 Donald Trump wins Election | <input id="editx" name="M1_1" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> +175 | |||||
| 8:00AM | 104 Field wins Presidential Election | <input id="editx" name="M2_1" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> -210 |
<tbody>
</tbody>
Anomaly that the field (which includes Trump) is higher odds than just Trump winning but it happens at 5dimes with these bets sometimes
Hillary should win unless she does that weird " laughing seizure" thingie during the debate.
Then all bets are off.
I am wondering about these polls tho. Trump may have been winning before the birther thing was brought back, now he lost like 5 points because of it.
That seems too much of a swing.
What kind of questions are they asking on them polls?
Then all bets are off.
I am wondering about these polls tho. Trump may have been winning before the birther thing was brought back, now he lost like 5 points because of it.
That seems too much of a swing.
What kind of questions are they asking on them polls?
Because it is not a sporting event, it is a simple actuarial exercise.
In a sporting event, the underdog has the possibility of an extreme spike in energy, lucky bounces, injury to players on the Fave side etc
In this actuarial exercise, calculated by the strongest collection of across the board, nationwide polling the Underdog is showing only about 39% support - which in a field of 130million voters translates into about 51million votes, a good 12-14million votes short of what will be needed to win.
There is virtually no chance at this point that in the final 19 days, 12-14 million voters will suddenly decide Trump is the guy.
The only reason it is not like -1500/+1200 is the remote chance Clinton dies before Nov 8.
If she remains alive until the end of that day, any wager on Trump is peeing on your own shoes
