Trump +360 to +260 in 72 hours

Search

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
have my own shop
have done many transactions with many many members here, 5 figures consistently
not anonymous, many people know who I am
not a liberal, I'm an independant that despises trump
odds were better than pinnacle which usually offers the best odds

you'd think in the few words you said you would haven't been wrong on so much.

Ill Vouch, Defying is a good guy!
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
2,625
Tokens
Weak attempt. Trump's going to be the first Republican in over 60 years to lose the white male educated vote. Obviously, educated people are not buying what he's selling. But he's not trying to sell it to educated people. He knows his target is the poorly educated. He even admits he loves the poorly educated. So you guys are his wheelhouse.

Those poorly educated you refer to sure know how to make more dough than Hillary supporters.
Income of 75,000 or more

Trump supporters 49%
Clinton supporters 40%


Tue 11/8
101 Hillary Clinton wins Election -185
8:00AM102 Field wins Presidential Election +160
Tue 11/8103 Donald Trump wins Election +190
8:00AM104 Field wins Presidential Election -230

<tbody>
</tbody>


Clinton fading fast at the books & the books are a lagging indicator how long will it
take before Trump becomes even money.

Todays LA Times poll came out with the following internals:
Polled out to 100%

Whites Trump 63% Clinton 37%
Blacks Trump 18% Clinton 82%
Latino Trump 35% Clinton 65%
Others Trump 54% Clinton 46%

Now put these figures into the realclearpolitics 2016 demographic election scenario
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...cenarios.html#!

And your talking about a Trump landslide:
Votes: Trump 70.5 million Clinton 61.7 million
Trump 53.3% Clinton 45.7%
Electoral Votes
Trump 346
Clinton 192
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Those poorly educated you refer to sure know how to make more dough than Hillary supporters.
Income of 75,000 or more

Trump supporters 49%
Clinton supporters 40%


Tue 11/8
101 Hillary Clinton wins Election -185
8:00AM102 Field wins Presidential Election +160
Tue 11/8103 Donald Trump wins Election +190
8:00AM104 Field wins Presidential Election -230

<tbody>
</tbody>


Clinton fading fast at the books & the books are a lagging indicator how long will it
take before Trump becomes even money.

Todays LA Times poll came out with the following internals:
Polled out to 100%

Whites Trump 63% Clinton 37%
Blacks Trump 18% Clinton 82%
Latino Trump 35% Clinton 65%
Others Trump 54% Clinton 46%

Now put these figures into the realclearpolitics 2016 demographic election scenario
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...cenarios.html#!

And your talking about a Trump landslide:
Votes: Trump 70.5 million Clinton 61.7 million
Trump 53.3% Clinton 45.7%
Electoral Votes
Trump 346
Clinton 192

You can cherry pick any data you want, lmao. Clinton is going to win this rather easily. 5+ pts.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
You can cherry pick any data you want, lmao. Clinton is going to win this rather easily. 5+ pts.

Trump has been making excuses for months about it "being rigged". That will be repubs go to move if he loses. If Clinton loses....it will because Trump got more votes......these conservatives think everything is rigged when they lose something.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Trump has been making excuses for months about it "being rigged". That will be repubs go to move if he loses. If Clinton loses....it will because Trump got more votes......these conservatives think everything is rigged when they lose something.

Demoscums are famous for election fraud, it's just what they do.

Studies have proven it.

http://yournewswire.com/stanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud/

<header class="post-header" style="margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 22.4px; font-family: "Open Sans", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);">Stanford University Confirms Democratic Election Fraud

Posted on June 16, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in News, US // Comments (343)
</header>
Stanford-election-fraud-confirmed-885x350.jpg

<fb:share-button href="http://yournewswire.com/stanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud/" font="arial" type="button_count" class=" fb_iframe_widget" fb-xfbml-state="rendered" fb-iframe-plugin-query="app_id=1715884468669256&container_width=0&font=arial&href=http%3A%2F%2Fyournewswire.com%2Fstanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud%2F&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&type=button_count" style="display: inline-block; position: relative;"><iframe name="fc31aea31fab88" width="1000px" height="1000px" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" scrolling="no" title="fb:share_button Facebook Social Plugin" src="https://www.facebook.com/v2.6/plugins/share_button.php?app_id=1715884468669256&channel=http%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2Fr%2FP5DLcu0KGJB.js%3Fversion%3D42%23cb%3Dfc8a5c93a6768%26domain%3Dyournewswire.com%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fyournewswire.com%252Ff3d3724de66f6d%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=0&font=arial&href=http%3A%2F%2Fyournewswire.com%2Fstanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud%2F&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&type=button_count" class="" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: initial; border-style: none; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; max-width: none; position: absolute; visibility: visible; width: 81px; height: 20px;"></iframe></fb:share-button>
<iframe frameborder="0" hspace="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" tabindex="0" vspace="0" width="100%" id="I0_1473973640432" name="I0_1473973640432" src="https://apis.google.com/u/0/se/0/_/+1/fastbutton?usegapi=1&size=standard&annotation=bubble&hl=en-US&origin=http%3A%2F%2Fyournewswire.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Fyournewswire.com%2Fstanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud%2F&gsrc=3p&ic=1&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fscs%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fk%3Doz.gapi.en.uSj-H1crYns.O%2Fm%3D__features__%2Fam%3DAQ%2Frt%3Dj%2Fd%3D1%2Frs%3DAGLTcCPTf4t_FmVpq0QPsmITj2XPIeamqA#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled%2Cdrefresh%2Cerefresh%2Conload&id=I0_1473973640432&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fyournewswire.com&pfname=&rpctoken=37705837" data-gapiattached="true" title="+1" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: none; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; max-width: none; position: static; top: 0px; width: 106px; left: 0px; visibility: visible; height: 24px;"></iframe>

<iframe id="twitter-widget-0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" class="twitter-share-button twitter-share-button-rendered twitter-tweet-button" title="Twitter Tweet Button" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.d59f1863bc12f58215682d9908af95aa.en.html#dnt=true&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fyournewswire.com%2Fstanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud%2F&related=seanshhh&size=m&text=Stanford%20University%20Confirms%20Democratic%20Election%20Fraud&time=1473973640897&type=share&url=http%3A%2F%2Fyournewswire.com%2Fstanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud%2F&via=peoplesvoice_tv" data-url="http://yournewswire.com/stanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; max-width: none; position: static; visibility: visible; width: 60px; height: 20px;"></iframe>
<iframe src="http://www.redditstatic.com/button/button1.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Fyournewswire.com%2Fstanford-university-confirm-democratic-election-fraud%2F&title=Stanford%20University%20Confirms%20Democratic%20Election%20Fraud" height="22" width="120" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; max-width: none;"></iframe>

A bombshell study released by Stanford University confirms evidence of election fraud during the 2016 Democratic Party primaries.
<ins class="adsbygoogle responsive_article_opening_para" data-ad-client="ca-pub-7714649074404303" data-ad-slot="3297729077" data-adsbygoogle-status="done" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-block;"><ins id="aswift_0_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; display: inline-table; height: 280px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 336px; background-color: transparent;"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; display: block; height: 280px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 336px; background-color: transparent;"><iframe width="336" height="280" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowtransparency="true" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="true" id="aswift_0" name="aswift_0" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; max-width: 100%; left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px;"></iframe></ins></ins></ins>
According to a paper released this week entitled, “Are we witnessing a dishonest election?,” a state comparison based on the voting procedures used during the election reveals endemic election fraud within the system.
Given the stakes in the outcome of the American presidential elections, ensuring the integrity of the electoral process is of the utmost importance.
Are the results we are witnessing in the 2016 primary elections trustworthy? While Donald Trump enjoyed a clear and early edge over his Republican rivals, the Democratic contest between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernard Sanders has been far more competitive.
At present, Secretary Clinton enjoys an apparent advantage over Sanders. Is this claimed advantage legitimate?




We contend that it is not, and suggest an explanation for the advantage: States that are at risk for election fraud in 2016 systematically and overwhelmingly favor Secretary Clinton. We provide converging evidence for this claim.
First, we show that it is possible to detect irregularities in the 2016 Democratic Primaries by comparing the states that have hard paper evidence of all the placed votes to states that do not have this hard paper evidence. Second, we compare the final results in 2016 to the discrepant exit polls.
<iframe id="google_ads_iframe_/96451178/Affiliate-mid-article-OffGrid_0" title="3rd party ad content" name="google_ads_iframe_/96451178/Affiliate-mid-article-OffGrid_0" width="336" height="280" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: bottom; max-width: 100%;"></iframe>


Furthermore, we show that no such irregularities occurred in the 2008 competitive election cycle involving Secretary Clinton against President Obama.
As such, we find that in states wherein voting fraud has the highest potential to occur, systematic efforts may have taken place to provide Secretary Clinton with an exaggerated margin of support.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
1,585
Tokens
have my own shop
have done many transactions with many many members here, 5 figures consistently
not anonymous, many people know who I am
not a liberal, I'm an independant that despises trump
odds were better than pinnacle which usually offers the best odds

you'd think in the few words you said you would haven't been wrong on so much.
Didn't know that, what book/website?
Cool. Links? Not disputing that, would like to know for reference
Yes you are a liberal. We have seen where you stand on issues besides Trump. In fact, acting like something is true because you say it is a sure sign of a liberal.
Nice spin. Every book I looked at was higher than +190 for Trump to be president at that time. You are referencing a lower odds Pinnacle bet for Trump and the field, while offering a bet for Trump to be president, acting like you were giving competitive odds. Curious considering how sure you are Trump has no shot and the bet is a loser.

You would think having your own shop you would know the big difference between a Trump is president bet, and a Hillary is not President bet, or maybe you did and you were trying to pull a shady fast one. Either one isn't too flattering
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Trump has been making excuses for months about it "being rigged". That will be repubs go to move if he loses. If Clinton loses....it will because Trump got more votes......these conservatives think everything is rigged when they lose something.

It's hilarious. Trump is the most disliked Presidential candidate in history. TheRX alt-rightie deplorables simply don't understand basic math. I try to tell them, that uneducated white males are only ~17% of voters in America and that's the only group Trump has a dominating lead on (almost 40% lead, lmao). The other 83% of voters are either very close or favoring Hillary. So them thinking dead people, felons, and illegals are the reason they will lose is hilarious. It will take a miracle for Trump to get enough votes to win this election.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
1,585
Tokens
I've played at his shop for 5 years now.

Why on Earth would he give you a link? Nobody owes you shit boy.
Haray lets start over without the insults

You are a self titled ev whore. i respect that, I am too

Do you not see in this thread that Defying offered a "Trump wins presidency" bet, and when I told him there were much better odds at other books he referenced the Pinnacle odds on a "Trump and the field" bet (post #139)?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
2,625
Tokens
It's hilarious. Trump is the most disliked Presidential candidate in history. TheRX alt-rightie deplorables simply don't understand basic math. I try to tell them, that uneducated white males are only ~17% of voters in America and that's the only group Trump has a dominating lead on (almost 40% lead, lmao). The other 83% of voters are either very close or favoring Hillary. So them thinking dead people, felons, and illegals are the reason they will lose is hilarious. It will take a miracle for Trump to get enough votes to win this election.

It's obvious you latched onto polling info embellished by the MSM
that Trump does poorly in the college edu. catagory. Probably because you had a few college courses
along the way & your giddy & uppity about the polling revelations. Problems with combining all
college educated in a poll is so obvious. Definitely someone like you who may or may not have
a degree from some nameless diploma factory to on the other hand myself who made it through
a college where only 1 out of 20 out of state students are accepted, should not be coupled,
even remotely.

A little advice, quit trying for the gold medal in mental gymnastics. Anyway in a lighter tone $10
has been deposited into your account, courtesy of Correct the Record (a Clinton Foundation affiliate).
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,961
Tokens
Pinnacle......Here he comes.....Trump Steammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....She`s down to -172 @):)

Winner of 2016 US Presidential General Election?
Hillary Clinton -172
Donald Trump and all others +152

<tbody>
</tbody>
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,961
Tokens
@):)dbanana0-9@):mad::pointer::aktion033:missingte:dancefool


 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,961
Tokens
trump-train-1.jpg
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,961
Tokens
He`s going to win......I`m telling you now....She`s going down....Bye Bye Hillary :howdy:

Part-WAS-Was8650262-1-1-0.jpg
 

MLB Junkie
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,411
Tokens
have my own shop
have done many transactions with many many members here, 5 figures consistently
not anonymous, many people know who I am
not a liberal, I'm an independant that despises trump
odds were better than pinnacle which usually offers the best odds

you'd think in the few words you said you would haven't been wrong on so much.

I'll also vouch....defying is as solid as they come.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
What is categorized as uneducated vote? Are people who know how to build a diesel engine or cut crown molding considered uneducated? Are those who got a BA in philosophy or journalism considered more educated?

I just cant figure out what educated means and how it transpires into real life applications.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,142
Tokens
It's obvious you latched onto polling info embellished by the MSM
that Trump does poorly in the college edu. catagory. Probably because you had a few college courses
along the way & your giddy & uppity about the polling revelations. Problems with combining all
college educated in a poll is so obvious. Definitely someone like you who may or may not have
a degree from some nameless diploma factory to on the other hand myself who made it through
a college where only 1 out of 20 out of state students are accepted, should not be coupled,
even remotely.

A little advice, quit trying for the gold medal in mental gymnastics. Anyway in a lighter tone $10
has been deposited into your account, courtesy of Correct the Record (a Clinton Foundation affiliate).

It's funny when a Democrat cites voting demographics. You see, each and every election they dominate the lower income demographic, it's not even close. In 2012, Romney won every income demographic > 50k nationwide, no matter how you slice the income demographic pie.

The Democrats dominate the poor inner city vote, usually winning a ridiculous 90% of that vote.

The Democrats will win those demographics again, and without dominating them, they have no chance in a national election.

So when a Democrat tries to mock Trump supporters, we'll it's just as dumb as it comes.

Kinda shows how uninformed some people are, just selling left wing spin like it's gospel.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,858
Messages
13,574,195
Members
100,877
Latest member
businesstalkmag
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com