<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by #1cheater#:
I don't understand it when people say the bigger sites are, the better, more tables= more players and more money. I do undertsand to a certain extent, but the more players your faced with the harder it is to learn peoples tendencies and get use to play at that site.
Party Poker is near impossible to get a read on a table because players just jump in and out of games so much!
Why would anyone want to play at a site with 20,000 players?
I can see some answers now, more fish you say? maybe, but you go out and try to find the fish on a regular basis with 20,00 players jumping from table to table.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Am I the only one who plays at some of the larger sites and do not see players "jumping in and out" as much as some of these folks claim. Most of the time a player leaves the table after he's busted out, wins a decent sum, or the table either gets too wild or too tight.
Bottom line, at places like Party you frequently have to join a waitlist to get on a table so why don't you use that couple of minutes to observe the players (I don't usually but one could do this with minimal effort). The turnover really isn't that high so you can get your so called "read" on the players.
I do have to agree that a benefit of the smaller sites is the ability to play the same folks each day. With that said, this can also be detrimental because folks can either target you (if they are better players) or avoid you (if they are worse players). The best thing about the larger sites is the ability to ALWAYS find a game that suits your style of play (tight and/or loose) at any time. At that point if you are looking for "fish" who cares if you know their name or not, just look for a "fishy" game if that is your thing.
BTW, I do not recall seeing anyone say "bigger sites are, the better, more tables= more players and more money."