THURSDAY PRESEASON

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
494
Tokens
Off to a good start here at 5-1 +3.90% and hopefully it will continue with tonight's game.

For Thursday:

PITTSBURGH -5 Dallas 35

I had Dallas in last week's game with Houston but this week Pittsburgh qualifies in some very solid situations. Much has been written about taking dogs in the preseason, especially larger dogs. In fact, excluding this week of the preseason, week three, dogs of four or more are now 164-126-5 56.6% since 1983. But during week three, they are just 54-58-0. Why? It is also commonly known that coaches like to play their starters into the third quarter in these games, then resting their starters for most of their final preseason game. In other words, teams are now playing their starters longer and the better teams should win out. And they do. Dogs of five or more are just 37-50 and dogs of five to eight are just 31-50 (dogs of more than eight points are 6-0). The point here being anybody who tells you not to take favorites in the preseason, especially large favorites, is partly right, but not necessarily this week.

Much has also been made about Bill Parcells in the preseason, where he now stands 41-21-1 (1-1 this year). But what they don't tell you is Parcells is only 5-6 as a dog of three or more and just 3-4 as a road dog off a win. It appears Parcells has played most of these games as the favorite, or perhaps with the better team, during most of these years. Tonight, however; he won't have the better team and he got his win last week which should temper the need to win another game so quickly. On the other side is Bill Cowher, who is now 5-1 as a favorite when his team has yet to win a game (the lone loss was last week against Philly). I have to believe Cowher will want his team to play hard tonight and we will get his starters for at least two quarters and possibly a couple of series into the third quarter. With that in mind, that means it's Tommy Maddox and company against Chad Hutchinson and company. That's a mismatch. I could get back doored in the last quarter but I'll take my chances.

The Steelers qualify in a couple of solid situations tonight. They qualify in a 27-8-1 situation that plays on teams off a couple of losses and a 30-5-1 situation that plays on teams who lose their first two games of the preseason, including a 23-0-1 subset of that 30-5-1 situation. I'll give it a shot with Pittsburgh tonight.

YTD 5-1 +3.90%

1% PITTSBURGH -5
 

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
3,271
Tokens
excellent write up as usual.

Congrats on your record so far and good luck tonight.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
5,019
Tokens
GL 6 Sense
1036316054.gif
 

ATX

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,251
Tokens
thanks for the post, the dog system I have been using has worked well, but something warns me off DAL. good luck, Sixth, I know better than to bet against you--it's just not a winning proposition, I'm leaning to the over as well.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
494
Tokens
GL Drunk and thanks.

Raiders - Thanks. I know you're a Raiders fan and I think you said a Bears fan. How do you think each team will do this year?

ATX - Yeah, if there is a week to be weary of the dogs, I think this is it. An awful lot of people on Pittsburgh though, which always scares me. GL with whatever you do.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
494
Tokens
ATX - Went to bed hungry. Nice call on the second half bets.

Definitely looked like Parcells wanted more out of his starters than Cowher. I don't see anything else for this week that I like. The only thing I have close to a play would be on the Giants but I don't like the Herm Edwards versus Jim Fassel match-up. Back again next week. Good luck this weekend guys.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
5,019
Tokens
6th Sense- Here's my take on the Bears. I really like the defense. They are going back to an aggressive style instead of the read and react scheme that they played last year. You'll see the lineman in the backfield a lot this year similar to TB. On offense they are horrible. The OTs are questionable although they are strong at C and G's. Thomas is one of the worst RB's in the league and Stewart can't pass. Duce Staley would help if they can trade for him. This team could be good in a year or two.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
494
Tokens
Thanks Raiders. Interesting you mention the speed and trying to simulate TB. I've also heard GB is doing the same thing, StL, of course, with Lovie Smith and one other team that slips my mind, at the moment. Many will try but few will duplicate. We'll see.

I agree with your assessment of the Bears. I bleed Green and Gold, as you probably know. The Pack have dominated the Bears, of late, in Chicago and struggled but usually won out in GB.

The Packers offense should be very, very good this year assuming they stay healthy, especially at the tackle position but their defense looks real poor right now. It will probably improve some but not enough to be very good.

Thanks again.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
5,019
Tokens
The only thing the bears have on the Pack this year is that the Bears are opening up their new stadium on a Monday night against the Packers. Should be fun. Have a great season 6th Sense. Your posts are always a must read.
1036316054.gif
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,117,988
Messages
13,550,067
Members
100,552
Latest member
taitdtcpro1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com