The Sports Cruncher's 2015 CFB Week 03 Lines & Market Plays

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
1,263
Tokens
Good luck this week crunch
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
I don't know Spurriers exact total record against UGA but I do know that Spurrier hates UGA more than any other team he's faced as a coach and as a player when he was at Florida. I remember reading in one of his books about how much he disliked UGA and his record while at USCe ATS is 7-1 in the last 8 and 4-1 in the last 5 away against UGA. Spurrier may not have the horses to stay on the field with GA but he'll throw everything he has at them in trying to beat them.

"Georgia covered only three of its 12 meetings with Steve Spurrier-coached Florida teams, and has managed only two covers in 10 tries since the Head Ball Coach arrived in Columbia."

from Hache Man Thread (ESPN INSIDER) http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1029135


I like the style of the thread as well, cloverleaf does this Yells at people like a petulant child. Water off a Duck's back bro. It don't mean a thing. His outburst don't represent the general feeling.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Spurrier may hate Georgia and have a good ATS record against them, but I'm not sure the correlation is causation, lol. I'm not a believer in magic switches that can be turned on and suddenly one team has a sudden advantage that they normally don't have. I tell you what, though -- if SCAR hangs around in this game maybe I'll start believing...just a little, lol.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
772
Tokens
Let me tell you about how my numbers are made this week. Each game a team has played against an FBS opponent has the stats from that game used to replace the first three games of stats from last year, with the rest of last year's stats counted as if we were in the final week of last season. So, if a team has played two FBS opponent's that's 6 games worth of stats from those 2 games plus the stats from their final 6 games last season. What I'm seeing to a certain degree is that the market is valuing these one or two games from this season even more than I am, which is why I'm taking several dogs this week who haven't played particularly well so far this year. Clearly you want to get a gauge of how far ahead or behind a team is compared to their last season's play as quickly as you can, I'm just not sure how quickly you should discount last seasons stats. I'm trying to balance this, but it's an odd week for me looking at the lines, for sure, as next week probably will be as well. Last week I was pretty much spot on predicting the market, this week it's not shaping up to happen like that, at least as far as sides are concerned. By week #5 my numbers will have transitioned to almost completely using just this year's stats.

isn't there a huge built-in fallacy in that you are blending in last year's stats with no regard for loss of players? in essence you are using last year's stats when some teams have 25-30% roster turnover in personnel. I think using blended rating would need almost all the same players from previous year to be effective. how do you account for coaching changes?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
772
Tokens
Maybe a dumb question...why do you waste so much forum spac

Jesus...post it without 40 different threads.

You got 10 plays....post them for God's sake. Ain't about "HITS" in a thread.

it IS a dumb question
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
isn't there a huge built-in fallacy in that you are blending in last year's stats with no regard for loss of players? in essence you are using last year's stats when some teams have 25-30% roster turnover in personnel. I think using blended rating would need almost all the same players from previous year to be effective. how do you account for coaching changes?

No, I've made some formulas to adjust last year's stats for returning personnel, recruiting ranks, regression to the mean, and if the head coach is new or in his 2nd year. They aren't super drastic alterations, though. Right now I'm going through each team right now and if a team is seemingly much better or worse at something so far this year I'm adjusting the stat projections even more than the 3x multiplier each game this season is applying already. As a result I'll probably be adding a few more plays, or not liking positions I currently have on plays much.

Adding for 1/2 Unit: Wake Forest @ Army Over 47

We came up a score short of the Over on the Army v. UConn game last week on nearly the same number as this game. Wake's passing game looks much improved this year and should be able to exploit Army's weakening pass defense even more than UConn did. Wake's rush defense was about the same as UConn's last year -- somewhat below average, while their pass defense gave up a couple of huge plays to Syracuse last week, so Army should rate to have okay success against them and might hit a surprise long ball score through the air like they did against UConn.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
772
Tokens
thanks for your reply, Crunch.

I've used blended ratings in nfl and nhl where personnel stays fairly constant year to year but have found college football too difficult to adapt to.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Spurrier may hate Georgia and have a good ATS record against them, but I'm not sure the correlation is causation, lol. I'm not a believer in magic switches that can be turned on and suddenly one team has a sudden advantage that they normally don't have. I tell you what, though -- if SCAR hangs around in this game maybe I'll start believing...just a little, lol.
On the other hand, I'm not impressed with Georgia's QB. Or should I say Virginia's second string QB...
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
On the other hand, I'm not impressed with Georgia's QB. Or should I say Virginia's second string QB...

True, but Vandy's defense also made WKU's Doughty look pretty pedestrian for most of the game. Fortunately any QB for Georgia just has to "manage the game" as they say in any match up where they're a pretty solid favorite.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
thanks for your reply, Crunch.

I've used blended ratings in nfl and nhl where personnel stays fairly constant year to year but have found college football too difficult to adapt to.

It's a work in a progress to figure out the best way to make good lines for the first month. So far the market has been prone to value this season's one or two games more than I have. You have to figure that if you're looking for hidden value that's the way to go. Being a numbers guy, for me the hidden value is in the sum of all the data, generally, lol.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Thx, Uni.

After adjusting my numbers more for this season's games, I now favor LSU by almost 10 points against Auburn. I have a 1/2 unit on Auburn +7.5 now, so I'm going to get off it with a chance at a middle with a 1/2 unit on LSU -6.5.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,859
Messages
13,574,238
Members
100,878
Latest member
fo88giftt
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com