Lol, I understand basic math unlike your friends. But you are making it up that it's "harder". Just because the nominal value is larger doesn't mean it's harder. That's just you making shit up. It is no more harder to go from $3 trillion to $6 trillion than it was going from $1 billion to $2 billion. It's all relative. Something you uneducated folk can't grasp.
Lol, I understand basic math unlike your friends. But you are making it up that it's "harder". Just because the nominal value is larger doesn't mean it's harder. That's just you making shit up. It is no more harder to go from $3 trillion to $6 trillion than it was going from $1 billion to $2 billion. It's all relative. Something you uneducated folk can't grasp.
Lol, remember who you're dealing with. I know what I'm talking about and your amateur knowledge is laughable to me. The graph is simple to understand. It's not harder to increase spending because nominal values are larger, it's harder because the dumbass Republicans in Congress refuse to increase it. Based on absolutely no mathematics. Just some annoying fiscal conservative cult-like ideology and an attempt to prevent Obama from looking like a good president. The fact you can't be honest enough to admit something so simple is disappointing. I had high hopes for you. Sad to see.
The irony of this thread is that it's selling the silly simple narrative libtarded leaders sell to their stupid base, who swallow whole without reflex
they don't even realize those same leaders take credit with every uptick and blame others with every hiccup, literally flip flopping on a monthly basis. I can't comprehend how people can be so simple minded, but I don't have that dreaded disease
they don't even realize those same leaders take credit with every uptick and blame others with every hiccup, literally flip flopping on a monthly basis. I can't comprehend how people can be so simple minded, but I don't have that dreaded disease
