The Howey Report...Social Security 'problem' and a health care 'crisis'

Search

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
INDIANAPOLIS - Within weeks of my monthly COBRA payment to Anthem ballooning from $940 to $1,160, Harvard University released a study that revealed close to half of all bankruptcies in the U.S. are due to a family medical crisis.

Released on Feb. 5, the Harvard study noted that in 2001, there were 1.45 million American families who filed for bankruptcy. In a study of 1,771 personal bankruptcy filers in five federal courts, 931 were interviewed in depth and "half cited medical causes. Even middle-class insured families often fall prey to financial catastrophe when sick." That study has relevance here in Indiana, where its Northern and Southern District Federal Courts have been leading the nation in bankruptcies in recent years. Some tie the Hoosier bankruptcies to compulsive gambling or predatory lending practices. But it's not much of a stretch to conclude that the national trend Harvard researchers revealed is applicable to Indiana. The health insurance crisis is playing a role in crippling the Hoosier economy.

In Marion this past week, 35 physicians gathered to protest the health care system. "Insurance companies don't care about medicine," Dr. Mike Roper was quoted in the Marion Chronicle-Tribune, revealing that his income has declined every year for the past decade because decreased reimbursements from insurance companies. "They care about statistics."

Dr. Keith Rockey explained, "The system is broken. It's so far broken it's mind-boggling. What we need in this country is a conversation about the health care system. We need to begin that in Marion, Indiana. If we don't begin at the grass-roots level, it won't happen."

Indiana is the same state where Anthem CEO Larry Glasscock reported record earnings ($743 million in 2003, up 41 percent from the year before) and he made a nifty $42.5 million bonus for himself. While Anthem executives and stockholders bask, dealing with the company personally is an on-going and unique hell, and human resources and doctors offices across the state will tell you the same thing.

The same week the Harvard study was released, President Bush said in his State of the Union address, "To make our economy stronger and more competitive, America must reward, not punish, the efforts and dreams of entrepreneurs. Small business is the path of advancement, especially for women and minorities, so we must free small businesses from needless regulation and protect honest job-creators from junk lawsuits."

I'm all for protection from needless regulation and junk lawsuits, and I recognize the need to, at some point, reposition the Social Security apparatus, which President Bush described as a crisis. But the real crisis - TODAY - is with health care.

"We do have a crisis in the cost in health insurance, particularly for small business America," U.S. Rep. Mike Pence, R-Columbus, said. "There is no question concerning the spiraling costs of Medicare will, over time, be a much greater threat to the fabric of the federal government in terms of its percentage of obligations confronting this nation with employer based health insurance."

President Bush went on to say, "To make our economy stronger and more productive, we must make health care more affordable, and give families greater access to good coverage and more control over their health decisions."

His answer? A call for Congress for tax credits to help "low income workers," a community health center in every poor county, tax credits to help low-income workers buy insurance, association health plans for small businesses and their employees, and expanded health savings accounts.

On the Indiana General Assembly front in a state where 561,000 Hoosiers are without health insurance (9.2 percent of the population), there are three bills that would also reform the system.

SB 269 authored by Sen. Pat Miller would allow small employers to work out plans that won't cover pre-existing conditions. SB 222 would allow insurance companies to waive coverage of those conditions for five years. HB 1075 would waive conditions without a time limit.

If you've had a heart attack, for instance, but will not be covered for any subsequent heart problems, that essentially means that thousands of families and sole proprietor businesses will still be faced with future bankruptcy. Some solution.

The real problem is that after First Lady Hillary Clinton's 1993 "health care reform" fiasco, the political will to effectively deal with the roots of the problem has vanished. President Bush and Indiana legislators are nibbling around the margins. And when they get done with their work sometime later this year, there are still going to be thousands of vulnerable families and businesses.

The politicians all like to tell you how they've staved off tax hikes, but essentially the health insurance scourge is the great ongoing tax hike on the American middle class. My COBRA payment is almost bigger than my house and care payments combined. Since when was that OK?

Politicians like Gov. Mitch Daniels tell us that it is the entrepreneurs who will fuel Indiana's "comeback." We'll be in a better position to fuel the economy and create jobs when we're not getting screwed by a health care system that puts our families at risk.

decaturdailydemocrat.com
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
It is a good read. It's not my work though. Boring anyhow to most. The Sheep would rather have war in a desert as to work on things at home.
 

Wooooooooh Nelly look em' go!!!
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,277
Tokens
The General said:
INDIANAPOLIS - Within weeks of my monthly COBRA payment to Anthem ballooning from $940 to $1,160, Harvard University released a study that revealed close to half of all bankruptcies in the U.S. are due to a family medical crisis.

Released on Feb. 5, the Harvard study noted that in 2001, there were 1.45 million American families who filed for bankruptcy. In a study of 1,771 personal bankruptcy filers in five federal courts, 931 were interviewed in depth and "half cited medical causes. Even middle-class insured families often fall prey to financial catastrophe when sick." That study has relevance here in Indiana, where its Northern and Southern District Federal Courts have been leading the nation in bankruptcies in recent years. Some tie the Hoosier bankruptcies to compulsive gambling or predatory lending practices. But it's not much of a stretch to conclude that the national trend Harvard researchers revealed is applicable to Indiana. The health insurance crisis is playing a role in crippling the Hoosier economy.

In Marion this past week, 35 physicians gathered to protest the health care system. "Insurance companies don't care about medicine," Dr. Mike Roper was quoted in the Marion Chronicle-Tribune, revealing that his income has declined every year for the past decade because decreased reimbursements from insurance companies. "They care about statistics."

Dr. Keith Rockey explained, "The system is broken. It's so far broken it's mind-boggling. What we need in this country is a conversation about the health care system. We need to begin that in Marion, Indiana. If we don't begin at the grass-roots level, it won't happen."

Indiana is the same state where Anthem CEO Larry Glasscock reported record earnings ($743 million in 2003, up 41 percent from the year before) and he made a nifty $42.5 million bonus for himself. While Anthem executives and stockholders bask, dealing with the company personally is an on-going and unique hell, and human resources and doctors offices across the state will tell you the same thing.

The same week the Harvard study was released, President Bush said in his State of the Union address, "To make our economy stronger and more competitive, America must reward, not punish, the efforts and dreams of entrepreneurs. Small business is the path of advancement, especially for women and minorities, so we must free small businesses from needless regulation and protect honest job-creators from junk lawsuits."

I'm all for protection from needless regulation and junk lawsuits, and I recognize the need to, at some point, reposition the Social Security apparatus, which President Bush described as a crisis. But the real crisis - TODAY - is with health care.

"We do have a crisis in the cost in health insurance, particularly for small business America," U.S. Rep. Mike Pence, R-Columbus, said. "There is no question concerning the spiraling costs of Medicare will, over time, be a much greater threat to the fabric of the federal government in terms of its percentage of obligations confronting this nation with employer based health insurance."

President Bush went on to say, "To make our economy stronger and more productive, we must make health care more affordable, and give families greater access to good coverage and more control over their health decisions."

His answer? A call for Congress for tax credits to help "low income workers," a community health center in every poor county, tax credits to help low-income workers buy insurance, association health plans for small businesses and their employees, and expanded health savings accounts.

On the Indiana General Assembly front in a state where 561,000 Hoosiers are without health insurance (9.2 percent of the population), there are three bills that would also reform the system.

SB 269 authored by Sen. Pat Miller would allow small employers to work out plans that won't cover pre-existing conditions. SB 222 would allow insurance companies to waive coverage of those conditions for five years. HB 1075 would waive conditions without a time limit.

If you've had a heart attack, for instance, but will not be covered for any subsequent heart problems, that essentially means that thousands of families and sole proprietor businesses will still be faced with future bankruptcy. Some solution.

The real problem is that after First Lady Hillary Clinton's 1993 "health care reform" fiasco, the political will to effectively deal with the roots of the problem has vanished. President Bush and Indiana legislators are nibbling around the margins. And when they get done with their work sometime later this year, there are still going to be thousands of vulnerable families and businesses.

The politicians all like to tell you how they've staved off tax hikes, but essentially the health insurance scourge is the great ongoing tax hike on the American middle class. My COBRA payment is almost bigger than my house and care payments combined. Since when was that OK?

Politicians like Gov. Mitch Daniels tell us that it is the entrepreneurs who will fuel Indiana's "comeback." We'll be in a better position to fuel the economy and create jobs when we're not getting screwed by a health care system that puts our families at risk.

decaturdailydemocrat.com

Doesn't matter where you live these days because health care will always be a problem until we shrink every laywer that needs a big closing,or big money month.It's when every dick,tom,and harry want to sue a doctor because their band aid fell off after surgery and now some lawyer says.....I think we have a case and we should be able to get you ummmm 30K!
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
Last year my wife gave birth to a 31 week old baby girl!

Being a preemie and the neurological system not having developed to the point of being able to coordinate the sucking swallowing and breathing reflexes ( my wife was born without that reflex and it never has developed ) a feeding tube was inserted into her tummy. About a month later we took her home and the hospital charged a couple hundred thousand for the stay. Insurance took care of almost all of it.

IMO, a couple days in the hospital and being able to have rented the automatic syringe unit that slowly pushed the baby formula into the tube would have cut cost dramatically and without insurance, you might want to think about doing it if the LAW allows it.

Another option might be to work out a payment plan with the hospital on the bill. I've heard most hospitals are more than fair with that.

Another option would be to go on welfare and get insurance through the state, that we the taxpayers pay for you. Then after having the baby you'll get even more money from the income tax payers.

That last option has become increasingly popular.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
7,379
Tokens
So someone elses child, because their mom and dad can't get insurance were they work, or can't afford it should what? Be allowed to die? WTF is your twisted point here?
BTW was that a genetic defect your wife was born with? Did she know she may pass this trait on to her children?
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
The Right Wing said:
Doesn't matter where you live these days because health care will always be a problem until we shrink every laywer that needs a big closing,or big money month.It's when every dick,tom,and harry want to sue a doctor because their band aid fell off after surgery and now some lawyer says.....I think we have a case and we should be able to get you ummmm 30K!

i know a guy who had to have a testicle removed...******* doctor removed the wrong testy..guess, what..he had to have the other removed as well...

sure...let's just cap it off at 100 bucks...hell, he shouldn't get anything...he could have cut his own nuts off i guess....
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
Tort Deform is also meant to take away the fundamental right of a citizen to take on corporate america in a courtroom.

Capping damages only hurts the most meritorious cases. Case that don't have merit don't receive large awards.

Cases that have merit (i.e. most harm, worst conduct) receive the large awards.

Bush's desire is to reward his donors and insulate them from liability. Trial lawyers are a way to regulate the safety and regulations of corp america:
flammable pajamas
exploding gas tanks
arsenic in treated wood
tobacco
asbestos
rogue doctors
VIOXX and every other bad drug out there
etc etc
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
Most of the lawsuits are against less than 3% of the doctors, and most of them are repeatedly sued, because they make mistakes again and again and again. There is a direct inverse match between the activeness of a state's medical board in yanking licenses from doctors who make constant mistakes and the cost of malpractice insurance/likelihood of getting sued as a doctor in that state. If doctors were willing to make medical licenses mean something by policing other doctors - like real professionals would do - there would be no need for most law suits, because actual malpractice would go way down. But they won't do that, because they can raise their fees high enough to afford malpractice insurance instead, and pass those fees on to the medical insurance of the patients - so the insurance firms are the big winners on both ends of this protection racket. And the insurance firms will be even bigger winners if the laws are fixed so they no longer have to actually pay out so much so often.
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
* Greedy, profiteering insurance companies



have:

*Overcharged doctors and other professionals for malpractice insurance while at the same time underpaying them for their work. * Meanwhile consumers have to resort to private suits to protect themselves from professionals who are not being held to account by the regulators.
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
While we are at, let me tell you that in 2004 Big Insurance had a banner year, one of their best ever. Go here to see:http://www.centerjd.org/free/mythbusters-free/InsProfitsHighestEver.pdf

Are there things that can be done to the tort system to improve it? Yes. However, a one size fits all cap is not one of them, as GWB would have the public believe.

How would you like it if a lawyer could be punished for bringing a frivolous lawsuit????
Guess, what? It is already a rule we lawyers live by. Every state and the federal rules system has Rule 11 (http://www.wvnb.uscourts.gov/frcp.htm#rule11)
Rule 11 gives the Court, a judge, the authority to punish and fine a party that signs a pleading that raises an issue that is wholly without merit.

Also, most states have enacted a "frivolous proceddings act" or something similarly entitled that allows a party that wins a lawsuit to recover expenses if the lawsuit was brought in bad faith or was frivilous. You won't here GWB talking about any of this either.

He just says lawsuits hurt the economy, drive up med mal ins rates and generally harm business. Its really a bunch of bull.

Insurance costs go up for many reasons, lawsuits aren't one of them. All the empirical data proves that lawsuits DON'T drive up med mal rates. Let me tell you what lawsuits do. They compensate people that are injured. They also deter others from engaging in conduct that will subject them to a civil award. They vindicate and enforce individuals rights.

Thomas Jefferson cited the deprivation of trial by jury as one of the determining factors that led to the revolution.
He also said "I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the priciples of its constitution"
That still holds true today and that is GWB wants to deprive this nation of and no less.
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
According to the Medical Protective filing: "Non-economic damages are a small percentage of total losses paid. Capping non-economic damages will show loss savings of 1.0 percent." The company also notes that a provision in the Texas law allowing for periodic payments of awards would provide a savings of only 1.1 percent. The insurer did not even provide its doctors that relief and eventually imposed a rate hike on its physician policyholders. "When the largest malpractice insurer in the nation tells a regulator that caps on damages don't work, every legislator, regulator and voter in the nation should listen," said FTCR's Executive Director Douglas Heller. "Medical Protective's rate increase and this smoking gun document prove that the insurance industry cannot be trusted on the issue of malpractice caps."
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
Big bucks poured into Republican campaign coffers from tort "reform" industries. The L.A. Times had a story on Thursday Lobbying Tab Is $1.1 Billion for Half a Year.



Reports tallying lobbyist expenditures for the rest of the year are due in February -- and industry insiders expect the yearly total to exceed last year's record of roughly $2 billion.

"A lot of business groups have been waiting for years, if not decades, for all the political stars to be aligned so they could get legislation passed on issues like medical malpractice," said Stephen Moore, who heads the Club for Growth, a leading business advocacy group. "The overall issue of lawsuit abuses and bringing a stop to them will mean that the lobbying frenzy will be even more intense in 2005," Moore added.




The story cited Political Moneyline who provides a nice list of the top political contributors:

The Top organizational spenders were lead by the Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. ($20 million) and its Institute for Legal Reform ($10 million). They were followed by the American Medical Assn. ($9.2 million), General Electric (8.4 million), the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers of America ($8 million), Freddie Mac $6.7 million), National Assn of Realtors($6.6 million), Altria ($6.5 million), the Asbestos Study Group ($6.2 million) and the American Hospital Assn ($6 million).
It's almost a Who's Who of tort reform.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
7,379
Tokens
Good stuff General and 919. This administration counts on the public being uninformed. It's worked well so far.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
Wow, I can't tell what suprises me more -- that I actually red all five parts of that garbage, or that I actually thought that it would build some sort of cogent argument against tort reform. Instead it was five pages of fact-checking on the campaign promises and political wheeling-dealing of W., centered somewhat loosely around the theme of tort reform, basically like reading the sentence "Fire is hot!" over and over again for five pages.

Take a close look at the state of tort in the US (2.2% of GDP, the highest of he industrialised world; a 125% increase in total cost in ten years, nine-figure judgments for ephemerous "pain and suffering" claims, etc.) and try to argue with a straight face that there is not something inherently wrong with the system, and I want six bags of what you're smoking. I live near a major college and could retire on a steady supply of whatever that stuff is.


Phaedrus
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
919


I'm all for responsibility e.g. in the case of medical malpractice. In fact, I am very big on personal responsibility as a general concept, and therefore cannot take the hypocritical stance that 1) doctors [and presumably other evil creatures like big corporations, manufacturers, etc.) should be held responsible for errors, but 2) sue-happy shïtwits and the lawyers who agitate them should not. This is just nonsensical.

Punitive damages and ephemeral "pain and suffering" judgments are what broke our civil court system, not doctors who can't cut straight. The doctors in question would be there regardless of the current state of the ccs; the idiots who seriously assert that having a clamp left in your nuts after a vasectomy is worth $ 30 million are the ones to blame for the problems, because it is they who are a product of the system, not incompetent doctors.

You're confusing which element of the equation is the problem.


Phaedrus
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
im not sure what you think im confusing...

i believe that a cap is not the answer...reducing the number of cases is....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,427
Messages
13,581,584
Members
100,981
Latest member
eaniston39
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com