You're an obnoxious turd, and there's absolutely no reason for cynicism.
I am no shill for Gameday. I couldn't care less if they fell off the face of the earth. All I'm saying is that in my experience, they've proven to be the best of the half-dozen or so books I tried out (albeit over a brief period of time). If someone has something negative to say about them (and claiming that they'll 'steal money right out of your account is just about the most impugning statement you can make) then I want to know the basis of their claim. Perhaps my experience with them was not an accurate reflection of their business practices, and his claim of their dishonesty is true? If so, then everybody should be privy to it.
Simply blaspheming a reputable book with no substance behind your claim is slander, pure and simple.
I am no shill for Gameday. I couldn't care less if they fell off the face of the earth. All I'm saying is that in my experience, they've proven to be the best of the half-dozen or so books I tried out (albeit over a brief period of time). If someone has something negative to say about them (and claiming that they'll 'steal money right out of your account is just about the most impugning statement you can make) then I want to know the basis of their claim. Perhaps my experience with them was not an accurate reflection of their business practices, and his claim of their dishonesty is true? If so, then everybody should be privy to it.
Simply blaspheming a reputable book with no substance behind your claim is slander, pure and simple.
How do you give Gameday a thumbs up & Sirbet a thumbs down for software? Its' the same software.
You blackjack complaint is silly. you won 20K and say it cheats.
Otherwise, great post
Nice to see both the negatives & positives here. Sometimes we get caught up in one complaint out of thousands of accounts & unfairly label a book.
You blackjack complaint is silly. you won 20K and say it cheats.
Otherwise, great post
Lander --
I like both Sirbet's and Gameday's software. There's only one difference between the two: Sirbet logs you out after some five minutes of inactivity, while Gameday keeps you on even if you don't click the screen for a little while. A minor quibble that I recognize is done for security reasons, but I find the Sirbet tactic to be a nuisance.
I don't think the BJ complaint is silly at all. You don't win $20K in 600 hands and then, after requesting a withdrawal, lose 2/3 of it in the exact same number of hands. Don't get me wrong: it is POSSIBLE. I'll never be able to prove definitively that they cheat. But given their incentive to do so, and the relative impossibility that they'd ever be caught, as well as the fact that they refused to answer my delicately worded questions about the issue, leads me to conclude there's enough circumstantial evidence to believe that something's rotten in Denmark.
I like both Sirbet's and Gameday's software. There's only one difference between the two: Sirbet logs you out after some five minutes of inactivity, while Gameday keeps you on even if you don't click the screen for a little while. A minor quibble that I recognize is done for security reasons, but I find the Sirbet tactic to be a nuisance.
I don't think the BJ complaint is silly at all. You don't win $20K in 600 hands and then, after requesting a withdrawal, lose 2/3 of it in the exact same number of hands. Don't get me wrong: it is POSSIBLE. I'll never be able to prove definitively that they cheat. But given their incentive to do so, and the relative impossibility that they'd ever be caught, as well as the fact that they refused to answer my delicately worded questions about the issue, leads me to conclude there's enough circumstantial evidence to believe that something's rotten in Denmark.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by dogs24:
I don't think the BJ complaint is silly at all. You don't win $20K in 600 hands and then, after requesting a withdrawal, lose 2/3 of it in the exact same number of hands. Don't get me wrong: it is POSSIBLE. I'll never be able to prove definitively that they cheat. But given their incentive to do so, and the relative impossibility that they'd ever be caught, as well as the fact that they refused to answer my delicately worded questions about the issue, leads me to conclude there's enough circumstantial evidence to believe that something's rotten in Denmark.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
If winning $20K in 600 hands is possible, why would you think it's nearly impossible to lose just as much in the next 600 hands ? If you think losing the $14K is so bizarre, isn't it even more bizarre that you could win the $20K first ?
And if they were trying to cheat you, why would they let you win $20K in the first place ? How would they know that you wouldn't withdraw all your money when you hit $20K - in which case they would really have shot themselves in the foot by letting you win that first $20K.
I don't think the BJ complaint is silly at all. You don't win $20K in 600 hands and then, after requesting a withdrawal, lose 2/3 of it in the exact same number of hands. Don't get me wrong: it is POSSIBLE. I'll never be able to prove definitively that they cheat. But given their incentive to do so, and the relative impossibility that they'd ever be caught, as well as the fact that they refused to answer my delicately worded questions about the issue, leads me to conclude there's enough circumstantial evidence to believe that something's rotten in Denmark.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
If winning $20K in 600 hands is possible, why would you think it's nearly impossible to lose just as much in the next 600 hands ? If you think losing the $14K is so bizarre, isn't it even more bizarre that you could win the $20K first ?
And if they were trying to cheat you, why would they let you win $20K in the first place ? How would they know that you wouldn't withdraw all your money when you hit $20K - in which case they would really have shot themselves in the foot by letting you win that first $20K.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>If winning $20K in 600 hands is possible, why would you think it's nearly impossible to lose just as much in the next 600 hands ? If you think losing the $14K is so bizarre, isn't it even more bizarre that you could win the $20K first ?
And if they were trying to cheat you, why would they let you win $20K in the first place ? How would they know that you wouldn't withdraw all your money when you hit $20K - in which case they would really have shot themselves in the foot by letting you win that first $20K. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
And if they were trying to cheat you, why would they let you win $20K in the first place ? How would they know that you wouldn't withdraw all your money when you hit $20K - in which case they would really have shot themselves in the foot by letting you win that first $20K. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
