The Donald Beats Crooked Hillary in the Ratings.....30 Million to 28 Million.

[boss415]

kth)(&^Read it and weep Libtard ! Knocked the f*ck out with just the facts Jack !
Key word Fallacy !
False just like you !

 

[Greenbacks]

The link of Gamblers fallacy is gonna seal up this whole thing

I had to make you a dog boss415.....He has a lot of experience at this arguing stuff.

Don`t get offended by being the underdog......You only been in about 4 arguments in 12 years....lol

 

[boss415]

I had to make you a dog boss415.....He has a lot of experience at this arguing stuff.

Don`t get offended by being the underdog......You only been in about 4 arguments in 12 years....lol

It is fun to beat this guy uo like a red headed step child!

 

[boss415]

Wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamblers%27s_fallacy

 

[Greenbacks]

Wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamblers%27s_fallacy

[h=1]Gamblers's fallacy[/h]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Gamblers's fallacy in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.

• Log in or create an account to start the Gamblers's fallacy article, alternatively use the Article Wizard, or add a request for it.
• Search for "Gamblers's fallacy" in existing articles.
• Look for pages within Wikipedia that link to this title.

Other reasons this message may be displayed:

• If a page was recently created here, it may not be visible yet because of a delay in updating the database; wait a few minutes or try the purge function.
• Titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive except for the first character; please check alternative capitalizations and consider adding a redirect here to the correct title.
• If the page has been deleted, check the deletion log, and see Why was the page I created deleted?.

 

[vitterd]

Now it works......Click it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambling

Boss couldn't post his own link.....and then spent 20 mins asking for your help.....then the link doesn't even help his argument .....call this thing greenbacks. It been a slaughter. I really didn't even have to throw a punch. Dude knocked himself out.

 

[boss415]

http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamblers%27s_fallacy

 

[vitterd]

I had to make you a dog boss415.....He has a lot of experience at this arguing stuff.

Don`t get offended by being the underdog......You only been in about 4 arguments in 12 years....lol

Im sure he lost those as well.

Give him the smelling salts Greenbacks......it's over. -160 was a steal

 

[boss415]

Boss couldn't post his own link.....and then spent 20 mins asking for your help.....then the link doesn't even help his argument .....call this thing greenbacks. It been a slaughter. I really didn't even have to throw a punch. Dude knocked himself out.

Sorry i am not in my computer room with 17 different screens and losing argumennts on all of em

 

[boss415]

Monte Carlo fallacy, gamblers fallacy, just google it . It woild be a great read and you can learn something Libtard

 

[Greenbacks]

Monte Carlo fallacy, gamblers fallacy, just google it . It woild be a great read and you can learn something Libtard

The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the mistaken belief that, if something happens more frequently than normal during some period, it will happen less frequently in the future, or that, if something happens less frequently than normal during some period, it will happen more frequently in the future (presumably as a means of balancing nature). In situations where what is being observed is truly random (i.e., independent trials of a random process), this belief, though appealing to the human mind, is false. This fallacy can arise in many practical situations although it is most strongly associated with gambling where such mistakes are common among players.

 

[Greenbacks]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacy

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/gamblers.html

http://io9.gizmodo.com/the-night-the-gamblers-fallacy-lost-people-millions-1496890660

http://bigthink.com/praxis/how-the-gamblers-fallacy-could-ruin-your-day

 

[boss415]

The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the mistaken belief that, if something happens more frequently than normal during some period, it will happen less frequently in the future, or that, if something happens less frequently than normal during some period, it will happen more frequently in the future (presumably as a means of balancing nature). In situations where what is being observed is truly random (i.e., independent trials of a random process), this belief, though appealing to the human mind, is false. This fallacy can arise in many practical situations although it is most strongly associated with gambling where such mistakes are common among players.

Thanks GB! Beat his ass with a flip phone and a little help from my friends. Good night Libtard!

 

[boss415]

:hikitty:Like a puppy getting its face rubbed in the first dump it took in the house huh Libtard? How does it taste ?

 

[RenoChazz]

Vitterd's debating style is actually very similar to Donald Trump's. Pretty ironic.

 

[Greenbacks]

Buster has some game.....He destroyed The Guesser last night.....Pretty much a 2nd round KO.

Buster vs vitterd....The line would be a PICK......That fight would go the distance.

 

[vitterd]

Vitterd's debating style is actually very similar to Donald Trump's. Pretty ironic.

I'm not as anti trump as most dems.

 

[vitterd]

:hikitty:Like a puppy getting its face rubbed in the first dump it took in the house huh Libtard? How does it taste ?

Are you still here? It's over already.....you got carried out on a stretcher. Go back to the minor league division. You aren't ready for this and it showed.

 

[boss415]

The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the mistaken belief that, if something happens more frequently than normal during some period, it will happen less frequently in the future, or that, if something happens less frequently than normal during some period, it will happen more frequently in the future (presumably as a means of balancing nature). In situations where what is being observed is truly random (i.e., independent trials of a random process), this belief, though appealing to the human mind, is false. This fallacy can arise in many practical situations although it is most strongly associated with gambling where such mistakes are common among players.

Hey Libtard what part of this dont you understand? Do you need to go upstairs and have your mom spell it out for you?
Skull crushed and down goes Libtard!

 

[boss415]

Mistaken belief is the premise you live by Libtard!