"The Corporation"

Search

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
Politics (slightly) aside for a moment -- this may be the most important film of our age. Its focus is on the unweilding power of the corporate entity, and the often negative consequences to humankind and our ecosystem (to name a couple) all in the interest of profit.

It is riddled with a great deal of extremist-type images and metaphors (the corporation is compared blatantly to a 'psychopath') and is lacking in opposing arguments. However, I implore you to have a look at this film.

Some of its highlights:

1. The privatisation of basic necessities -- as part of lending agreements, the WTO and the IMF force third world nations to privatise many of their basic infrastructure elements such as water. Rain water, in fact, is 'property' owned by the corporation. Bolivia, who sold its water source to Bechtel in San Francisco as part of a loan agreement from the World Bank, is highlighted.

2. Corporations have been granted the right by the Supreme Court to patent lifeforms, only limited to full-birth humans. The DNA of many of our earth's animals is now corporately-owned. The long-range implications of this are astounding.

3. Corporations routinely employ the labour of children and exceedingly impoverished peoples of third world countries, and then depart from that country when the laws of supply and demand drive the wages up to that country's legal minimum wage. The average Bangladeshi garment worker, for example, earns less than 10 cents per hour, 80 hours per week. 'Everyday Low Prices' are brought to us on the backs of these workers. Over half of American garments come from sweatshops like these.

While I will concede that this may be among the most left-leaning films I've seen to date, it may very well prove to be one of the most important. Even if your only concern is for capitalism at its former grassroots level -- when the Mom and Pops actually stood a chance -- you need to see this film.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,515
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
3. Corporations routinely employ the labour of children and exceedingly impoverished peoples of third world countries, and then depart from that country when the laws of supply and demand drive the wages up to that country's legal minimum wage. The average Bangladeshi garment worker, for example, earns less than 10 cents per hour, 80 hours per week. 'Everyday Low Prices' are brought to us on the backs of these workers. Over half of American garments come from sweatshops like these.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Of course, this doesn't happen in just the garment industry. As we know, the IT industry is sending thousands of jobs to nations such as India. Why pay $50,000 for an American computer engineer when you can pay $5,000 for an Indian engineer?

Over time, more and more good jobs will move to India. This will drive up the wages, and then the corporations will simply move their jobs to another poor country. Watch out Thailand, here we come!

Eventually (and it might take hundreds of years), there won't be much of a global difference when it comes to standard of living. Good jobs leave America, America's standard of living decreases. Good jobs enter India, India's standard of living increases. This is great if you live in a poor country, but it BLOWS if you live in a rich country. One could argue that America's standard of living peaked during the 1990s and will never return to that level.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
Generally speaking, the heirarchy of a Corporation and a communist system are not that unlike one another in the phsychological and physical control they exert over individuals.

The difference is, if the Corp has idiots at the top, the money system ensures that it will eventually bust out, thereby removing the top idiots. ie Enron, Parmalat.

The power of money, lies in its objectivity, Communism has no objectivity, and that is its fatal flaw.

In other respects the parallels are uncanny between the two organisational structures.

Slogans that you have to learn at company workshops that are so corny its unreal.
If you do not toe the party line, your career could be permanently stalled, as well as your bonus and salary reviews.
ie Individualism is actively discouraged.
The power of management is absolute and negative in its application, but you get this 'come and talk to us anytime' guff.
Disorganised inter-departmental communications that are simple to fix/solution and yet it takes years, if ever, to sort.
Restrictions of choice, get a 2nd job and you're sacked. Talk about your wages with another employee and your sacked.

I did work for a good Corporation once.
A diamond in a field of turnips.
Genuinely smart management makes a huge difference, and it does exist.
A happy employee stays put, works hard and feels valued as they head to work in the morning, knowing that most of the other poor bastards in the morning rushhour mob are going to a company that is 'limited' in more ways than just the incorporation structure.

[This message was edited by eek on February 15, 2004 at 07:16 AM.]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
Footnote:

To put a Corporation in charge of an essential public service is a folly.

Certain industries are too important to civilisation and society for the Corporate approach.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
You guys make my hair hurt this early in the AM.
Happy belated valentines day X!
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
Thank you, peaches.

Patriot, you should watch Lou Dobbs'exporting America some night. While the crux of his argument is protection of the American economy (while mine would be to stop the exploitation of overseas labourers) he's doing a good thing. Every night he lists off companies that are sending your manufacturing jobs overseas to cheaper foreign markets and then lists of a few companies that are still employing people at home.

Globalisation is an amazing opportunity for us to help the poor out of the cycle. Instead, corporations are helping us to lower our standard of living while doing nothing in the short term to help raise theirs. As mentioned above, it will take hundreds of years for it to even begin to balance out.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
X...there is so much info to track you don't know what to believe after a while,I did hear over one of the talking head shows this AM that the state of Indiana has some sort of sanction against companys taking their jobs over seas...then I heard another argument how the Kyoto agreement will somehow cause the US to lose even more jobs....one thing for sure X, corporations are like woman you can't live with 'em and you can't live without them.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
While there's some truth in what you're saying, it's not entirely lost, either. I've always been a 'Made in Canada' buyer whenever I can, although it tends to cost me more ... at least I know that some nine-year old kid isn't sacrificing so that I can have a new pair of shoes. There are things that the average person can do to minimize the impact the corps are having on our communities. For starters, you could boycott WalMart and Disney. Buy Reebok or Adidas instead of Nike. Etc.

www.corpwatch.org
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,180
Messages
13,565,094
Members
100,759
Latest member
68gamebaiartt
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com