Taking the 60 minute line instead of the ML...

[Brazil4Worldcup2002]

In the long run, which would be better, the 60 minute line, or the ML.
I have one bookies that posts GREAT 60 minute lines. For example:
Columbus is 2.75 over Atlanta (60 minutes)
while another bookie has Columbus evens on the ML.
Big difference...

So which in the long run would be more profitable?

thx in advance

 

ML is the most profitable in a long run, then handicap lines -.5/+.5 and after that three way results (60 MIN).

 

....Actually..... I'm not sure anymore, but it should go like this.

If you bet a fav, bet -.5 not ML.
If you bet a dog, bet ML not +.5

60 Minutes betting is worst choice because of a higher vig.