stil waiting for those wmd sites

By the way, are those chemical suits dangerous for USA ?

Also waiting to see the links between saddam and bin laden.

Also waiting for USA military to <liberate> Bassrah, Nasirriya, Baghdad.

I heard some of those cities were liberated in the first two days of the war. wtf ?

Also waiting for the <free> western press to stop showing faces of iraqui pow's, conforming to the Geneva Convention.

Now, give me hell boys.

 

Don't feel bad Don.

America is still waiting for the an explanation regarding Bush using forged documents claiming that Iraq purchase uranium as "evidence of WMD" (despite advisement from CIA Director, George Tenet, that those documents were not authetenic.

Don,
Keep us updated in the event that the Bush Administration acts shifts policy from "Weapons of Mass Distraction" towards actual truth & facts.

 

patience, 8 days in. Gulf 1, 43 days.....
the US may be sitting on WMD, going public may make Saddam gas our troops. once the WMD proof is brought public Saddam has nothing to lose. patience my friend.

 

lander,

i'm also waiting for someone to explain me how is this war legal despite the UN convention thats says that wars without UN approval are illegal, and USA Constitution that says that it is not legal to change the regime and assassine other countries leaders.

 

outandup,

you are right. it will take quite some time to ship those wmd from usa to iraq for media purposes. the boys are too bussy right now.

 

I'm also waiting for a valid reason of why the US will not forfeit the rebuilding of Iraq to a Canadian led UN effort. Since this would be a conflict of interest on the "Coalition"'s behalf and that the "Coalition" has repeatedly stated that this mission is solely for "liberation" purposes & not "economic" purposes, I fail to understand why Colin Powell & the rest of the Administration are so opposed to the UN efforts (despite asking the UN for money & food for the Iraqis).

 

The UN is a failed organization, I'm actually surprised they are still trying to run that 3 ring circus. There are finished.

 

outandup

do you think that is a good thing ?

the world doesn't need UN any more ?

OK, you think UN has no credibility.

But how about the USA Constitution ? How did you miss that part of my post ?

Thank you.

 

lander.

too many questions buddy.
let them study one by one.
i'm sure they will come up with something good.

 

if i remember correctly iraq signed a seize fire to end gulf 1, they did not abide by the seize fire. this is a resumption of that war.

the us senate voted in favor of giving the president of the US the right to use force.

the constitution gives the president the authority to defend America without any other nations permission, the UN is not mentioned in the US constitution. if so where? i'll review it.

 

if i remember correctly iraq signed a seize fire to end gulf 1, they did not abide by the seize fire. this is a resumption of that war.

no proofs whatsoever that iraqis did not abide by the seize fire. they are not attacking anyone, the UN failed to prove that they had wmd. so, what didn't they abide by.
yes, this is a resumption of that war. a Bush family resumption.

the us senate voted in favor of giving the president of the US the right to use force.

yet, they did not give him the right to assassine saddam and to change the regime in iraq. why ? because that is illegal by USA Constitution. the USA forces are trying to do just that.


the constution gives the president the authority to defend America without any other nations permission, the UN is not mentioned in the US constution. if so where? i'll review it.

Tell me how are the USA soldiers defending USA in Iraq.
Did Iraq attack America ? No.
Was Iraq involved in 9-11 events ? No, unless you give me a proof for that.

 

[radiofreecostarica]

they did not abide by the seize fire

neither has the US.

 

that's your opinion, that's not how I see it. and that's not how 70%+ Americans see it.

 

[KMAN]

Don Marco - Give me a break. I think we have other things on our mind like protecting our troops then finding the damn paperwork that shows what's really going on. First things first, we free Iraq then we get the details. Makes sense to me.

KMAN

 

[DannyMay]

and that's not how 70%+ Americans see it.

Polls consistently show that most Americans are against it.

 

[KMAN]

DannyMay - Everyone knows that you can find 1000 website/polls that support both sides. Here's one that supports the war.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,82357,00.html


KMAN

 

[DannyMay]

Most Americans are against this war.

 

[silver7]

What fire were the Iraqis supposed to seize? They probably have enough matches of their own and don`t need to steal anyone else`s fire. Now if you`re talking about a "cease fire" well then!! Jesus the stupidity in this forum is unbelievable. And you come in here and expect to be taken seriously?? Go read a comic book.

I love my country but fear my government.

 

fuk you.

 

Lol.

Outandup, I trully respect your views, and anyone other's views for that matter, but I have to tell you that it looks to me that none of your opinions is based on facts.
It is all about FOX, CNN and other <free> press.
Sorry if I'm wrong here.
Good luck buddy.