Steelers ML may be best ML overlay in SB history

[Fishhead]

It's not a parlay, that would be incredibly bad. Bet them separately. For example, roughly:

Pitt ML -220 1100/500
Ariz +7.5-125 888.89/711.11

Risking 388.89 to win 1211.11...around +311

I would lay an extra hundred on Pitt ML..........

 

[patswin]

It's not a parlay, that would be incredibly bad. Bet them separately. For example, roughly:

Pitt ML -220 1100/500
Ariz +7.5-125 888.89/711.11

Risking 388.89 to win 1211.11...around +311

ok thanks

 

[Conan]

To anyone that thinks Pittsburg is a lock, I have to say this:

Everyone knows that a 9-7 team doesn't belong in the Superbowl. How did they get there in the first place? That's impossible.

How can they ever win? That's impossible too.

 

[-Chase-]

pitt wins this game by 20+ imo. i am HUGE on pitt ML, pitt 1st half and pitt -6.5 for the game.

sd and baltimore were tougher games IMO and i dont even really think those two teams are that good at all. the nfc is just really bad this year and pitt should win quite easily.

play this game 15 times and i'd be surprised if arizona won more than once..

 

[JohnnyB]

SIA just moved back to -200 and I made sure to jump all over it.

 

[CalvinTy]

It's not a parlay, that would be incredibly bad. Bet them separately. For example, roughly:

Pitt ML -220 1100/500
Ariz +7.5-125 888.89/711.11

Risking 388.89 to win 1211.11...around +311

D2bets, I may be lost but this doesn't cover both sides? With those two bets, a Pitt win by 10 would lose -288.89? Am I missing something here?

* CalvinTy

 

[viking611]

D2bets, I may be lost but this doesn't cover both sides? With those two bets, a Pitt win by 10 would lose -288.89? Am I missing something here?

* CalvinTy

it would lose 388.89. He is risky 388.89 to win 1211 for the score to end pitt by 1-7.

 

[Fishhead]

it would lose 388.89. He is risky 388.89 to win 1211 for the score to end pitt by 1-7.

Just another example of why I rate VIKING611 a top five poster at TheRX.

FH

 

[Holysmoke+]

egg on your face yet fish?

 

[Kruser6]

egg on your face yet fish?

No. Just him saying that it's a good overlay doesn't mean he has egg on his face.

 

[Kruser6]

egg on your face yet fish?

Holysmoke =

 

[punter]

Aint over.

 

[viking611]

egg on your face yet fish?

looks like you're the one with egg on face. and fishhead didn't say this was a lock...said it was a great overlay for superbowl. can't count on a team scoring 16 pts in 4 minutes at end of game to wipe it out.

 

[Holysmoke+]

egg on your mommas p00ntang, and boy do those eggs taste sweet now

fvking ML LMAO

 

[Holysmoke+]

...........three NFC teams.



You know damn well the Steelers win this game tommorrow.

you read this viqueen?

 

[Holysmoke+]

thats why this forum sucks so fvking bad because newbies saw that thread from a mod and laid the wood and they really should have lost their ass.

you fvking nuthuggers can suck fish's dick all you want. see ya next year niggaz

 

[patswin]

It's not a parlay, that would be incredibly bad. Bet them separately. For example, roughly:

Pitt ML -220 1100/500
Ariz +7.5-125 888.89/711.11

Risking 388.89 to win 1211.11...around +311

TY for the advice on this wager, I ended up playing this.

This place is def full of sharp guys

 

[CalvinTy]

it would lose 388.89. He is risky 388.89 to win 1211 for the score to end pitt by 1-7.

Thanks, viking611. I meant -388.89 (not -288.89), but I later understood what they were doing feeling that PIT would win, but not cover the spread for +310's. That's a good bet (not because it did hit, but getting a range of PIT -1 to -7 for +310's is a great value).

Good job, FH & D2bets!

* CalvinTy

 

[viking611]

thats why this forum sucks so fvking bad because newbies saw that thread from a mod and laid the wood and they really should have lost their ass.

you fvking nuthuggers can suck fish's dick all you want. see ya next year niggaz

:howdy::howdy: buh bye egg face!


GREAT CALL FISHHEAD!!! Gotta love where this one landed!

 

[D2bets]

:aktion033