Stanford Line has gone from (-3) to (+1).

Hanzandfranz · Nov 30, 2003

It was known that Childress was most likely not going to play today when the line was established....is this just public money...? I REALLY want to load up on Stanford now....thoughts?

landslide · Nov 30, 2003

i got stanford at -3 cuz i thought it would go up. guess i should have waited.

sportsmonitor · Nov 30, 2003

Looks like Childress is starting. Rice is leading 13-6 and Childress has all 6 points for Stanford.

DIRECTVPOLICE · Nov 30, 2003

no wonder the line moved..stanford looks bad in the 1st.shooting like shit.lucky to only be down 6.far from 17th in the nation

Railbird · Nov 30, 2003

Childress NOT playing, Yahoo is wrong. Stanford up 59-55 in 2nd half.

Railbird · Nov 30, 2003

Montgomery is a goofball, sits Hernandez for the 1st half.

Railbird · Nov 30, 2003

Stanford probably a final four team BTW.

sandmanfromlv · Nov 30, 2003

Stanford sneaks in for the cover...

Railbird · Nov 30, 2003

Chris Hernandez scores all of his 17 in the 2nd half, Stanford wins 60-56. Thing with coaches like Montgomery and Pat Douglass is there bent on playing 12 men rotation, if they use 7 guys Stanford wins by 15, Loitch is horrible. When they get Childress back will be real tough.

sportsmonitor · Nov 30, 2003

CBSsportsline.com also was wrong. Looks like we can't trust either one of these sites!!! How the hell can they possibly show a guy not even playing continueing to score throughout a game????