budin may or may not have crews but his record is legit and he is one of the best selective touts out there.
what if you worked at a book and knew who the best selective sharps were and dreaded when they fired in on a play.
wouldnt it be best to take those groups and market them?
you can't deny the guys record and history in the business.
If i were a bookie and knew who the better gamblers were, i'd either lay their action off or bet it myself.
stan sharp on the other hand is not legit at all.
I didn't mean for that to be a dig on Budin. Well, maybe a little bit. His "crews" don't exist. They're just a way to hide or highlight records. I have no idea what the name of these supposed crews are, but let's say "The Boston Crew" is only 4-6 in their last 10 games. Guess what? You won't be seeing many plays from them, if ever again. He's going to start focusing on other crews so you don't see that 4-6 record. Maybe a "crew" out of New York is 8-2 in their last 10. Chances are you're going to see a lot more of their plays than The Boston Crew.
It's the same thing with Kelso and those guys at Dr. Guru. They only highlight their biggest plays. Why? Because if they kept a record of ALL their plays, people would see they aren't that great. I guess 'good job' for having a good record on your big plays, but I look at the big picture. If you're a good capper, you keep a running YTD total because you have nothing to hide. That's what RAS does. That's what Dr. Bob does. And that's what Sharp does.
It never ceases to amaze me how people fall for these touts' bullshit over and over and over again.