Yes sir, really bad loss.What about the really bad loss as a 3 touchdown favorite at Oklahoma? They were embarrassed there
Neither team would win it so it doesn't matter. And the already said no punishing CC losses so SMU should be there. I don't think we should look at it as though who we "believe" would win or is better should get the final remaining spot as the whole point of a extended playoff is for teams who don't normally get the shot to have the right to prove themselves regardless of what is likely. If you are at the bottom of a 12 teamer hoping to get in if you don't you got 0 complaints.It is more important to look at the SOS and the ranked teams that Alabama beat than the bad ones they lost. It shows they are capable of beating playoff teams.
If SMU (61 SOS) played Georgia, VD, Missouri, LSU, Auburn, S Carolina, and yes, Oklahoma, they would have lost a lot more games than Bama. You can rest in the ACC for bigger games, you cannot in the SEC, it is a grind every weekend.
Vegas knows the truth, would make Bama (15) a huge favorite if they played SMU.
I do not like Bama, did not go there nor go to an SEC school, just stating the facts.
Putting nice little teams like SMU so they appear to be fair is a bad mistake, Clemson won the playoff bid fair and square according to the rules. Two ACC teams is not appropriate this yr.
SMU didn’t beat any currently ranked teamsSMU beat Pitt & Lville while they were ranked ... yes it matters, how would any team drop from the rankings if another team doesn't beat them?
SMU also beat TCU 8 wins, Duke 9 wins, BC 7 wins
It's ironic to even put Missouri on any list of quality teams and quite frankly Florida, LSU and A&M are scarring anybody
You claim not to be an SEC fan but your post certainly sounds like you are.
Maybe the SEC should just have it's own Jr NFL conference where all the SEC hardcore fans can just watch the same 10 teams play over and over