Shrink-
Thanks for weighing-in. However, I've seen plenty of threads with an "edited by Shrink" to delete an offensive part. I still don't see why the legally sensitive part of Hollywood's post couldn't have been edited, but the rest the of the thread remain.
Seems to be an over-reaction (just like me!). In the future, please try to remove just the offending sentences, rather than the entire thread. The RX's rich (undeleted) history of posts is an important asset. We often use RX to see how often one party has complained or cried "Wolf".
Anyway, thanks for your attention on this subject.
Thanks for weighing-in. However, I've seen plenty of threads with an "edited by Shrink" to delete an offensive part. I still don't see why the legally sensitive part of Hollywood's post couldn't have been edited, but the rest the of the thread remain.
Seems to be an over-reaction (just like me!). In the future, please try to remove just the offending sentences, rather than the entire thread. The RX's rich (undeleted) history of posts is an important asset. We often use RX to see how often one party has complained or cried "Wolf".
Anyway, thanks for your attention on this subject.
