With this current line compounded with the injury I'll downgrade this to a 1* play. So to repeat I would play this at 1* had I not already wagered on it with the better number. I'm personally hoping to put .25* if +3.5 becomes available. Note: It is available. Evidently I've also been hibernating
Hope this helps
Last edited:
You must be a bear cause the game ended over 60 hours ago. On a serious note I simply updated my card and record Clefty. Once the game concludes I typically update my record in the title and post my pending plays in the message section. I downgraded it personally though I know many followers played it for the initial strength posted. GL my friend. Try not to hibernate any further as the bowl season is officially in full swing. Starting with the froggies tonight.
Too funny. At a Christmas party on Saturday and missed it. I have climbed out of my cave an ready for action.
Have you had a chance to view this RX thread? Your thoughts (they like TCU tonight)?
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=645613
Good luck and thanks for the hard work.
Btd: +0.2*
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* TCU -1.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: Slight advantages on Offense, defense, and coaching. Why I don't: Boise has a slightly better pass D and motivation.
.25* Boise State +3.5 -105 (BetJamaica)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook): Middle attempt
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* FAU +7 -123 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.25* Hawaii -1.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: Its ND Why I don't: Its Hawaii
.10* Notre Dame -1.5 (buying back)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook)
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* TCU -1.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: Slight advantages on Offense, defense, and coaching. Why I don't: Boise has a slightly better pass D and motivation.
.25* Boise State +3.5 -105 (BetJamaica)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook): Middle attempt
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* FAU +7 -123 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.25* Hawaii -1.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: Its ND Why I don't: Its Hawaii
.10* Notre Dame -1.5 (buying back)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook)
Yeah had mines on Sunday :drink:
Yeah I had a look at that thread earlier this week. I think its safe to say 90% of the handicappers at the RX have TCU tonight. Pags, GoSooners, Boxslayer just to name the ones I have the most respect for are on them.
Is this a good thing? Yeah I guess. What matters is that they cover
Yeah had mines on Sunday :drink:
Yeah I had a look at that thread earlier this week. I think its safe to say 90% of the handicappers at the RX have TCU tonight. Pags, GoSooners, Boxslayer just to name the ones I have the most respect for are on them.
Is this a good thing? Yeah I guess. What matters is that they cover
With that said, and with the possibility of Dizzle chiming in....MONEY MANAGEMENT PEOPLE!
just for an update on deandre,
he's already had surgery and it was successful. He'll start rehabing in six weeks and they expect rehab to be done end of June/beginning of July.
He's been fun to watch this season for sure. I hope he'll be able to play next season. I've heard through the grapevine that he might be up for some criminal charges though. It'll be interesting to see if it comes to be. GL tonight VOR!
he's already had surgery and it was successful. He'll start rehabing in six weeks and they expect rehab to be done end of June/beginning of July.
He's been fun to watch this season for sure. I hope he'll be able to play next season. I've heard through the grapevine that he might be up for some criminal charges though. It'll be interesting to see if it comes to be. GL tonight VOR!
Btd: 1-2 -1.25*
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook): Middle attempt
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* FAU +7 -123 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.25* Hawaii -1.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: Its ND Why I don't: Its Hawaii
.10* Notre Dame -1.5 (buying back)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook)
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook): Middle attempt
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* FAU +7 -123 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.25* Hawaii -1.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: Its ND Why I don't: Its Hawaii
.10* Notre Dame -1.5 (buying back)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook)
Why TCU didn't cover
-Patterson was simply out coached in the 1st half (except in the final drive when Peterson went prevent)
-Moore was more efficient than Dalton
-TCU threw too much on 1st downs
-Dalton INT was a huge swing play
-Pass interferences (two were not catchable)
-TCU not emphasizing off tackle runs attacking Boise's undersized ends
-Wildcat formation should have been used more
I could elaborate on this game for pages but no point. Bottom line TCU should have won this game by double digits (just like the Utah game). Think Patterson is somewhat overrated.
Just not getting the same breaks here like I'm getting in the NFL. Oh well.....
-Patterson was simply out coached in the 1st half (except in the final drive when Peterson went prevent)
-Moore was more efficient than Dalton
-TCU threw too much on 1st downs
-Dalton INT was a huge swing play
-Pass interferences (two were not catchable)
-TCU not emphasizing off tackle runs attacking Boise's undersized ends
-Wildcat formation should have been used more
I could elaborate on this game for pages but no point. Bottom line TCU should have won this game by double digits (just like the Utah game). Think Patterson is somewhat overrated.
Just not getting the same breaks here like I'm getting in the NFL. Oh well.....
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
.3* Clemson -3 +105 (Bodog)
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* LA Tech ML +100 (Bookmaker)
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook): Middle attempt
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.10* Miami +8 +104 (Matchbook)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* FAU +7 -123 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook).
.25* Hawaii -1.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: Its ND Why I don't: Its Hawaii
.18* Notre Dame -2 -108 (Matchbook) (buying back)
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
.3* Clemson -3 +105 (Bodog)
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* LA Tech ML +100 (Bookmaker)
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook): Middle attempt
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.10* Miami +8 +104 (Matchbook)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* FAU +7 -123 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook).
.25* Hawaii -1.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: Its ND Why I don't: Its Hawaii
.18* Notre Dame -2 -108 (Matchbook) (buying back)
Btd: 1-3 -1.345*
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101 (Matchbook)
0.1* Texas Tech -4.5 +101 (Matchbook)
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
.3* Clemson -3 +105 (Bodog)
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* LA Tech ML +100 (Bookmaker)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* Nevada -1 -110 (Bookmaker)
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook)
.05* USC -9 +105 (Matchbook)
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.10* Miami +8 +104 (Matchbook)
.15* FAU +7 -123 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook).
Taken a step back the past few days as I believe the bowl situation has me over thinking. I'm treating this so differently than the regular season that it has me questioning things I typically don't. Added LA Tech and Nevada as I think they're two solid plays. Lets see if some good karma comes my way.
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101 (Matchbook)
0.1* Texas Tech -4.5 +101 (Matchbook)
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
.3* Clemson -3 +105 (Bodog)
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* LA Tech ML +100 (Bookmaker)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* Nevada -1 -110 (Bookmaker)
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook)
.05* USC -9 +105 (Matchbook)
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.10* Miami +8 +104 (Matchbook)
.15* FAU +7 -123 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook).
Taken a step back the past few days as I believe the bowl situation has me over thinking. I'm treating this so differently than the regular season that it has me questioning things I typically don't. Added LA Tech and Nevada as I think they're two solid plays. Lets see if some good karma comes my way.
Btd: 2-3 -1.195*
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101 (Matchbook)
0.1* Texas Tech -4.5 +101 (Matchbook)
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
.3* Clemson -3 +105 (Bodog)
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* LA Tech ML +100 (Bookmaker)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* Nevada -1 -110 (Bookmaker)
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook)
.05* USC -9 +105 (Matchbook)
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.10* Miami +8 +104 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook).
3* Ole Miss +7 -110: What I like: Value, Best D-Line Tech has faced all season, solid O-Line, underrated passing attack, and solid run game. My concerns: Tech's passing game.
1.5* Texas Tech -4.5 -101 (Matchbook)
0.1* Texas Tech -4.5 +101 (Matchbook)
2* Georgia Tech -2.5 -110: What I like: Value, better coach, more efficient offense and defense. Concerns: TO's and health
.7* LSU +3.5 +103 (Matchbook)
2* Oregon +3.5 -110: Why I like it: Chip's rushing attack vs Pokes vulnerable front 7. Concerns: Defense
.7* Pokes -3 +100 (Matchbook)
1.5* Ball State -2.5 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better QB and Defense Why I don't: Tulsa's offense
.8* Tulsa +2.5 -101 (downgraded)
1* Iowa -3 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better defense and running game Why I don't: Steve Spurrier
1* BC -3 -110 (BM): Why I like it: Coaching, rush defense, and Vandy's offense Why I don't: BC QB play
1* Nebraska +3 -110 (Betonline) Why I like it: Ganz vs Clemson's secondary. Nebraska's offensive line vs Clemson's O-Line Why I don't like: Davis/Spiller and Clemson's underrated rush defense
.3* Clemson -3 +105 (Bodog)
1* GA -6 -110 (Bookmaker): Why I like it: Better coach, QB, and wideouts. Why I don't: GA Defense
.3* Michigan State +7.5 -101 (Matchbook)
.5* UNC -1 +104 (Matchbook): Why I like it: location, solid run defense, coaching, and healthy Yates Why I don't: Pat White and UNC's lack of a great running game..
.5* LA Tech ML +100 (Bookmaker)
.25* Nevada -1.5 -110 (WSEX)
.15* Nevada -1 -110 (Bookmaker)
.5* Penn State +10.5 -110 (Bookmaker) Why I like it: Value, balanced offense to expose USC slightly overrated defense, and solid enough D Why I don't: location and USC D
.15* USC -9 -101 (Matchbook)
.05* USC -9 +105 (Matchbook)
.5* Oregon State -3 -105 (Greek): Why I like it: Moveau or Canfield over Stull, coaching, and rested front 4. Why I don't: Shady, Shady, Shady
.5* Oregon State -3 +102 (Matchbook)
.65* Pitt +3 -115 (downgraded)
.25* Miami +7.5 +104 (Matchbook)
.10* Miami +8 +104 (Matchbook)
.25* FSU -4.5 -110 (Greek): Why I like it: talent, speed, better skill players, and solid rush defense Why I don't: Its FSU
.10* Wisconsin +5.5 -104 (Matchbook)
.10* Oklahoma +3 +112 (Matchbook).
