You guys love to shit on Dr. Bob, and it's really a shame. Sure, he doesn't hit 75% every week, like the 'touts' out here claim. But the man is a legitimate handicapper who is absolutely transparent with regard to his historical performance. The man has never come out with a "game of the year, game or the month, or wipe out winner of the century." All he does is make picks and post his record.
Basketball Best Bets (all records in star-basis)
2007-08 = 460-428-22 for -10.8 Stars
2006-07 = 450-415-11 for -6.5 Stars
2005-06 = 574-420-16 for +112.0 Stars
2004-05 = 562-519-25 for – 8.9 Stars
2003-04 = 664-483-39 for +132.7 Stars
2002-03 = 588-585-27 for -55.5 Stars
2001-02 = 539-396-19 for +103.4 Stars
2000-01 = 549-473-21 for +28.7 Stars
1999-00 = 532-428-26 for +61.2 Stars
1998-99 = 410-297-20 for +83.3 Stars (NBA Strike season)
Total = 5328-4444-226 (55%) for +439.6 Stars
I'd rather invest in a handicapper who is, on average, +43.96 stars PER YEAR, OVER TEN YEARS RUNNING, over any of these douchebags you all claim to be the GOD of sports handicapping.
I apologize in advance if I have offended anyone. However, in this business, numbers speak LOUDER than words...
Basketball Best Bets (all records in star-basis)
2007-08 = 460-428-22 for -10.8 Stars
2006-07 = 450-415-11 for -6.5 Stars
2005-06 = 574-420-16 for +112.0 Stars
2004-05 = 562-519-25 for – 8.9 Stars
2003-04 = 664-483-39 for +132.7 Stars
2002-03 = 588-585-27 for -55.5 Stars
2001-02 = 539-396-19 for +103.4 Stars
2000-01 = 549-473-21 for +28.7 Stars
1999-00 = 532-428-26 for +61.2 Stars
1998-99 = 410-297-20 for +83.3 Stars (NBA Strike season)
Total = 5328-4444-226 (55%) for +439.6 Stars
I'd rather invest in a handicapper who is, on average, +43.96 stars PER YEAR, OVER TEN YEARS RUNNING, over any of these douchebags you all claim to be the GOD of sports handicapping.
I apologize in advance if I have offended anyone. However, in this business, numbers speak LOUDER than words...