I sort of figured it out when he promoted that game and the Home team was -5.5 or 6 but thanks for confirmation.
Picking the ATS Winner of a game by handicapping it = 50% proposition
Picking Al Demarco's selection based by viewing his promotions = 98% proposition
(If only the Books let us wager on who Al has
)Nerlens Noel should have slapped Carmello's hand with .04 left up 96-93. What did he (and the 27 useless caches now occupying the Sixer bench) think was going to happen?
If you are referring to MLK 2015 results, I would not really call one year of games a trend. I understand what you are trying to say, but I would look at 5-10+ years of MLK data to spot possible trends.
As always, good luck to all!
And as a Public Service Reminder on this National Holiday, please remember most of these services are scum sucking leeches who focus on marketing and sales techniques to simply try and separate you from your money. If they really knew this much about sports investing, most would not bother selling plays. Each day there are many more fade opportunities than following opps.
I sort of figured it out when he promoted that game and the Home team was -5.5 or 6 but thanks for confirmation.
Picking the ATS Winner of a game by handicapping it = 50% proposition
Picking Al Demarco's selection based by viewing his promotions = 98% proposition
(If only the Books let us wager on who Al has
Nerlens Noel should have slapped Carmello's hand with .04 left up 96-93. What did he (and the 27 useless caches now occupying the Sixer bench) think was going to happen?
Pretty dumb switch by Noel and Covington there......RC defended Melo well all game .....no reason to switch ......not sure the thought process there.
E join us over here for game chatter:
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1024860&page=65&p=11445455#post11445455
