- Status
The Clinton Foundation spent a whopping $7.8 million on travel in 2014, while giving out only $5.2 million in grants. The Daily Caller also noted that the $5.2 million given out in grants was the only portion of the roughly $91.3 million spent in 2014 that actually went to charity
Put another way, only 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s budget was actually used to help people.
Put another way, only 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s budget was actually used to help people.
Daily Caller, Conservative Tribune.
. Of course, legit sites have already established that 88%+ of Clinton fundation money actually goes to charitable programs, way above charity acceptable stances. http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/whe...tion-money-go/
So, since I am stupid, are you going to take me up on the wager to prove you are smarter than me?
And you said Trump was "My Guy".... which is why I stated that "My Guy" isnt facing any lawsuits anywhere, and asked you to prove it.
Name your wager amount, and I am free everyday, and you choose the testing center to meet at, and we will post the results here at the forum
Daily Caller, Conservative Tribune.
Just figured out why you are such a Hillary fan. Anti-semetic traitor.
[h=1]List of Islamist Nations Who Gave Hillary $143 million in August Alone is Unreal:[/h]
Sep 19, 2016 by admin in DIASPORA Previous post
CNN praised Hillary Clinton this last week for raising $143 million dollars in the month of August from FOREIGN NATIONS!
She can’t get enough from Americans I guess!
Just who is giving her money and how much? Here is a start.
- Kingdom of Saudi Arabia $10-25 million
- State of Kuwait $5-10 million
- State of Qatar $1-5 million
- Sultanate of Oman $1-5 million
- United Arab Emirates $1-5 million
- Embassy of Algeria $250-500 Thousand
- Government of Brunei Darussalam $1-5million
[h=6]- AUGUST 28, 2016 -[/h][h=1]TRUMP CAMPAIGN STATEMENT ON LATEST ALARMING CLINTON FOUNDATION DEVELOPMENT[/h]
He Was A Billionaire Who Donated To The Clinton Foundation. Last Year, He Was Denied Entry Into The U.S.
By Joseph Tanfani
Los Angeles Times
August 28, 2016
Click Here To Read
(…)
Since the 1990s, Chagoury has also cultivated a friendship with the Clinton family — in part by writing large checks, including a contribution of at least $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.
By the time Hillary Clinton became secretary of State, the relationship was strong enough for Bill Clinton’s closest aide to push for Chagoury to get access to top diplomats, and the agency began exploring a deal, still under consideration, to build a consulate on Chagoury family land in Lagos, Nigeria.
But even as those talks were underway, bureaucrats in other arms of the State Department were examining accusations that Chagoury had unsavory affiliations, stemming from his activities and friendships in Lebanon. After a review, Chagoury was refused a visa to enter the U.S. last year.
Chagoury is a prominent example of the nexus between Hillary Clinton’s State Department and the family’s Clinton Foundation, which has come under renewed scrutiny during her presidential run. The organization, founded as a way for the Clintons to tap their vast network for charitable works, has tackled some of the steepest challenges in the developing world, including rebuilding Haiti and fighting AIDS in Africa. It has also come under fire for its willingness to accept money from foreign governments with interest in swaying U.S. policy during Clinton’s time as secretary of State, and the controversial histories of some donors.
(…)
In spite of his network of powerful friends, Chagoury has aroused the suspicions of U.S. security officials. In 2010, he was pulled off a private jet in Teterboro, N.J., and questioned for four hours because he was on the Department of Homeland Security’s no-fly list. He was subsequently removed from the list and categorized as a “selectee,” meaning he can fly but receives extra scrutiny, Homeland Security documents show. The agency later wrote to Chagoury to apologize “for any inconvenience or unpleasantness.”
That letter did not explain why Chagoury was on the no-fly list, but another Homeland Security document shows agents citing unspecified suspicions of links to terrorism, which can include financing extremist organizations; Chagoury later told reporters that agents asked him what bank he used in Nigeria.
Chagoury believes it was unfair for government officials to disclose the episode and to “suggest that he was a potential threat,” Corallo said. He said that Chagoury’s lawyers resolved the issue and that he never asked anyone else for help.
Chagoury told ABC News and the Center for Public Integrity at the time that he was miffed because his travel problems made him miss seeing the Lakers in the playoffs. "I just love the Lakers,” he said.
His visa troubles stem at least in part from his involvement in the tangled politics of Lebanon. Chagoury has contributed to charitable projects there, advocated on behalf of the country’s Christians and formed political alliances, including with Michel Aoun, a Lebanese Christian politician who served as army commander and prime minister during the country’s civil war.
For a decade, Aoun’s party has been part of a political coalition with Hezbollah, the Shiite Muslim group backed by Iran that has seats in Lebanon’s parliament. Hezbollah is classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S., which holds the group responsible for the 1983 bombing of the U.S. embassy in Beirut and a Marine barracks blast that year that killed 241 American servicemen. Drug Enforcement Administration investigations have also found that Hezbollah is in league with Latin American cartels to launder hundreds of millions of dollars in drug profits.
Chagoury was “known to have funded” Aoun, a Lebanese government minister told then-Ambassador Jeffrey D. Feltman in 2007, according to a cable published by WikiLeaks that didn’t go in detail about Chagoury’s relationship with Aoun. The minister suggested that the U.S. “deliver to Chagoury a strong message about the possibility of financial sanctions and travel bans against those who undermine Lebanon’s legitimate institutions.”
Chagoury never got a scolding, though. Instead, Band, Bill Clinton’s aide, pushed for new access for Chagoury after Hillary Clinton took over at the State Department. In 2009, Band wrote his friends in the department. “We need Gilbert Chagoury to speak to the substance guy re Lebanon. As you know he's key guy there and to us and is loved in Lebanon. Very imp.” Huma Abedin, a longtime aide and confidante to Clinton and now vice chairwoman of her presidential campaign, suggested Feltman.
(…)
After Clinton left the State Department, Chagoury again found himself under suspicion by U.S. security officials. A 2013 FBI intelligence report, citing unverified raw information from a source, claimed Chagoury had sent funds to Aoun, who transferred money to Hezbollah. The source said Aoun was “facilitating fundraising for Hezbollah.” The U.S. put Chagoury in its database used to screen travelers for possible links to terrorism, interagency memos show.
The ties between Chagoury and Aoun ended years ago in a dispute over oil franchises, said Michel de Chadarev, an official with Aoun’s party. Chagoury now backs an Aoun rival for the presidency. De Chadarev said Aoun “categorically denied” any arrangement where he shared money with Hezbollah or passed funds from Chagoury: “No, no, no. Of course not. It is not in his principles to act as transporter to anyone.”
Last summer, when Chagoury planned a trip to Los Angeles, he applied at the U.S. embassy in Paris for a visitor’s visa and was refused, according to interviews and government documents. Based on the FBI report and other allegations from intelligence and law enforcement sources, the State Department denied the application. It cited terrorism-related grounds, a broad category that can apply to anyone believed to have assisted a terrorist group in any way, including providing money.
Chagoury has denied ties to Hezbollah. Two years ago, he helped pay for a conference in Washington on the persecution of Christians in the Middle East; some attendees supported Hezbollah, but the director of the group that organized the conference said that didn't mean Chagoury or other conference organizers were among them. “Hezbollah is part of the political reality of the country,” Andrew Doran told the National Review.
Click Here To Read The Full Article
Nigerian Billionaire Donor Gilbert Chagoury Denied Entry To U.S. Over Ties To Hezbollah
“The fact a major Clinton Foundation donor was denied entry into the U.S. over ties to the terrorist group Hezbollah is deeply troubling, especially when this individual had access to top aides at Hillary Clinton’s State Department. These revelations are yet another example of why the Clinton Foundation must be shut down and Hillary Clinton must demand the State Department immediately release her official schedules in full before the election. Voters deserve to know just how badly compromised a Hillary Clinton presidency would be.” – Jason Miller, Senior Communications AdvisorHe Was A Billionaire Who Donated To The Clinton Foundation. Last Year, He Was Denied Entry Into The U.S.
By Joseph Tanfani
Los Angeles Times
August 28, 2016
Click Here To Read
(…)
Since the 1990s, Chagoury has also cultivated a friendship with the Clinton family — in part by writing large checks, including a contribution of at least $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.
By the time Hillary Clinton became secretary of State, the relationship was strong enough for Bill Clinton’s closest aide to push for Chagoury to get access to top diplomats, and the agency began exploring a deal, still under consideration, to build a consulate on Chagoury family land in Lagos, Nigeria.
But even as those talks were underway, bureaucrats in other arms of the State Department were examining accusations that Chagoury had unsavory affiliations, stemming from his activities and friendships in Lebanon. After a review, Chagoury was refused a visa to enter the U.S. last year.
Chagoury is a prominent example of the nexus between Hillary Clinton’s State Department and the family’s Clinton Foundation, which has come under renewed scrutiny during her presidential run. The organization, founded as a way for the Clintons to tap their vast network for charitable works, has tackled some of the steepest challenges in the developing world, including rebuilding Haiti and fighting AIDS in Africa. It has also come under fire for its willingness to accept money from foreign governments with interest in swaying U.S. policy during Clinton’s time as secretary of State, and the controversial histories of some donors.
(…)
In spite of his network of powerful friends, Chagoury has aroused the suspicions of U.S. security officials. In 2010, he was pulled off a private jet in Teterboro, N.J., and questioned for four hours because he was on the Department of Homeland Security’s no-fly list. He was subsequently removed from the list and categorized as a “selectee,” meaning he can fly but receives extra scrutiny, Homeland Security documents show. The agency later wrote to Chagoury to apologize “for any inconvenience or unpleasantness.”
That letter did not explain why Chagoury was on the no-fly list, but another Homeland Security document shows agents citing unspecified suspicions of links to terrorism, which can include financing extremist organizations; Chagoury later told reporters that agents asked him what bank he used in Nigeria.
Chagoury believes it was unfair for government officials to disclose the episode and to “suggest that he was a potential threat,” Corallo said. He said that Chagoury’s lawyers resolved the issue and that he never asked anyone else for help.
Chagoury told ABC News and the Center for Public Integrity at the time that he was miffed because his travel problems made him miss seeing the Lakers in the playoffs. "I just love the Lakers,” he said.
His visa troubles stem at least in part from his involvement in the tangled politics of Lebanon. Chagoury has contributed to charitable projects there, advocated on behalf of the country’s Christians and formed political alliances, including with Michel Aoun, a Lebanese Christian politician who served as army commander and prime minister during the country’s civil war.
For a decade, Aoun’s party has been part of a political coalition with Hezbollah, the Shiite Muslim group backed by Iran that has seats in Lebanon’s parliament. Hezbollah is classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S., which holds the group responsible for the 1983 bombing of the U.S. embassy in Beirut and a Marine barracks blast that year that killed 241 American servicemen. Drug Enforcement Administration investigations have also found that Hezbollah is in league with Latin American cartels to launder hundreds of millions of dollars in drug profits.
Chagoury was “known to have funded” Aoun, a Lebanese government minister told then-Ambassador Jeffrey D. Feltman in 2007, according to a cable published by WikiLeaks that didn’t go in detail about Chagoury’s relationship with Aoun. The minister suggested that the U.S. “deliver to Chagoury a strong message about the possibility of financial sanctions and travel bans against those who undermine Lebanon’s legitimate institutions.”
Chagoury never got a scolding, though. Instead, Band, Bill Clinton’s aide, pushed for new access for Chagoury after Hillary Clinton took over at the State Department. In 2009, Band wrote his friends in the department. “We need Gilbert Chagoury to speak to the substance guy re Lebanon. As you know he's key guy there and to us and is loved in Lebanon. Very imp.” Huma Abedin, a longtime aide and confidante to Clinton and now vice chairwoman of her presidential campaign, suggested Feltman.
(…)
After Clinton left the State Department, Chagoury again found himself under suspicion by U.S. security officials. A 2013 FBI intelligence report, citing unverified raw information from a source, claimed Chagoury had sent funds to Aoun, who transferred money to Hezbollah. The source said Aoun was “facilitating fundraising for Hezbollah.” The U.S. put Chagoury in its database used to screen travelers for possible links to terrorism, interagency memos show.
The ties between Chagoury and Aoun ended years ago in a dispute over oil franchises, said Michel de Chadarev, an official with Aoun’s party. Chagoury now backs an Aoun rival for the presidency. De Chadarev said Aoun “categorically denied” any arrangement where he shared money with Hezbollah or passed funds from Chagoury: “No, no, no. Of course not. It is not in his principles to act as transporter to anyone.”
Last summer, when Chagoury planned a trip to Los Angeles, he applied at the U.S. embassy in Paris for a visitor’s visa and was refused, according to interviews and government documents. Based on the FBI report and other allegations from intelligence and law enforcement sources, the State Department denied the application. It cited terrorism-related grounds, a broad category that can apply to anyone believed to have assisted a terrorist group in any way, including providing money.
Chagoury has denied ties to Hezbollah. Two years ago, he helped pay for a conference in Washington on the persecution of Christians in the Middle East; some attendees supported Hezbollah, but the director of the group that organized the conference said that didn't mean Chagoury or other conference organizers were among them. “Hezbollah is part of the political reality of the country,” Andrew Doran told the National Review.
Click Here To Read The Full Article
[h=6]- SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 -[/h][h=1]TOP DEMOCRATS AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS HAVE CRITICIZED THE CLINTON FOUNDATION[/h]
Clinton Ally And Former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell (D) Said The Clinton Foundation Should “Disband” If Clinton Wins. “Former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D) said the Clinton Foundation should be disbanded if Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is elected to the White House. ‘I definitely think if she wins the presidency they have to disband it. I know it’ll be hard for President (Bill) Clinton because he cares very deeply about what the foundation has done,’ Rendell, a Clinton ally, told the New York Daily News.” (Rebecca Savranksy, “Rendell: Clinton Foundation Should Be Disbanded If Clinton Wins,” The Hill, 8/17/16)
Dem Senator Cardin: Clinton Foundation “Clearly Needs To Change The Way They Do Business.” FOX NEWS’ SHANNON BREAM:“Let's talk about the fact that the Clinton foundation has been abuzz this week. There’s been talk about a potential hack, potentially by Russian interests and there's been a statement by Bill Clinton that the foundation will no longer accept corporate money or foreign money if she's elected president. The Boston Globe said it should be shut down all together, it just creates a view of potential conflict of interest. They said in part, ‘The inherent conflict of interest was obvious when Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State in 2009. She promised to maintain a separation between her official work and the foundation, but recently released emails written by staffers during her State Department tenure make clear that the supposed partition was far from impregnable.’ They go on to say, listen, If the Foundation’s donors are truly motivated by altruism, and not by the lure of access to the Clintons, then surely the can find other ways to support the Foundation’s goals.’ Do you think the foundation should shut down altogether?” SENATOR BEN CARDIN (D-MD): “First, let's recognize what the foundation has been able to do. The Clinton Foundation has been able to help millions of people, over 10 million HIV aids alone saved countless lives. Its work is extremely important to global health. They’ve done some really great things. Now with Hillary Clinton being elected president, which we hope it will be, they clearly need to change the way they do business. They’ve indicated they will. They’re not going to accept any donations from foreign entities, they're going to change the way that the Clintons themselves interact with the foundation. Those decisions will be made appropriate to Hillary Clinton as president of the United States.” (Fox News’ “Fox News Sunday,” 8/21/16)
Clinton Supporter Rep. Grijalva (D-AZ) Called On Clinton To “Cut Off” The Clinton Foundation. MSNBC’S TAMRON HALL: “You also have The New York Times editorial today asking why the Clintons should cut ties to the Clinton Foundation. They say that the Clinton foundation has become a symbol of the Clintons’ laudable ambitions but also of their tangled alliances and operational opacity. The bottom line is that, when you look at polling it appears that the Clinton Foundation is hurting her, the perceived lack of transparency here. Do you believe it is time for her to do something different?” REPRESENTATIVE GRIJALVA (D-AZ): “Yeah, I do. And I think that there is a lot at stake in this election and I think if anybody knows that, it is Secretary Clinton. And I think her positions and the strength she’s been speaking to on issues is powerful and certainly has my support. But we’ve got to get rid of extraneous issues and if this Foundation is an extraneous issue that goes to the heart of whether it’s trust or transparency, then get rid of it because there is so much on the table right now for the American people and for the future of this nation, that extraneous issues such as the Foundation, which if that is something that needs to be cut off, then it should be cut off.” (MSNBC, 8/30/16)
The New York Times’ Editorial Board Said Bill, Hillary And Chelsea Clinton Should “End Their Operational Involvement In The Foundation And Its Affiliates For The Duration Of Her Presidency.” “A wiser course would be to ban contributions from foreign and corporate entities now. If Mrs. Clinton wins, Bill and Chelsea Clinton should both end their operational involvement in the foundation and its affiliates for the duration of her presidency, relinquishing any control over spending, hiring and board appointments.” (Editorial, “Cutting Ties To The Clinton Foundation,” The New York Times, 8/30/16)
The Boston Globe’s Editorial Board Called On The Clinton Foundation To Be Shut Down.” “Although the charity founded by former President Bill Clinton has done admirable work over the last 15 years, the Clinton Foundation is also clearly a liability for Hillary Clinton as she seeks the presidency. The once-and-maybe-future first family will have plenty to keep them busy next year if Hillary Clinton defeats Donald Trump in November. The foundation should remove a political — and actual — distraction and stop accepting funding. If Clinton is elected, the foundation should be shut down.” (Editorial, “Clinton Foundation Should Stop Accepting Funds,”Boston Globe, 8/16/16)
USA Today Editorial Headline: “Mothball The Clinton Foundation” (USA Today, 8/23/16)
The Washington Post Editorial Board Called On The Clinton Foundation To End All Ties To The Clintons Should Hillary Clinton Get Elected President. “Should Ms. Clinton win, all of that work and all of the foundation’s assets should be spun off to an organization with no ties to the first family.” (Editorial, “The Latest Clinton Emails Show What An Ethics Agreement Shouldn’t Look Like,” The Washington Post, 8/23/16)
The Los Angeles Times’ Editorial Board Called On Bill, Hillary And Chelsea To End Their Ties To The Clinton Foundation. “We would propose a differently solution: that the foundation continue but that the Clinton family sever its connection to it so long as Hillary Clinton is in the White House. That means not only Bill and Hillary Clinton but also Chelsea Clinton, who now serves as the foundation’s vice chair.” (Editorial, “It’s Time To Take The ‘Clinton’ Out Of The Clinton Foundation,” Los Angeles Times, 8/25/16)
The Minneapolis Star-Tribune Editorial Board Called On The Clintons To Shut Down The Clinton Foundation. “There is only one way to mitigate the damage at this point. As painful as it would be, the Clintons must shut down what until recently was known as the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. The half-measures being proposed don’t go far enough and leave the issue as one that will plague her until the last days of this election and perhaps beyond.” (Editorial, “It's Past Time To Shut Down The Clinton Foundation,” Minneapolis Star-Tribune, 8/26/16)
Leading Democrats, Including Joe Biden, Ed Rendell, and Ben Cardin Have Criticized The Clinton Foundation
Joe Biden Said That Clinton Still Needs To “Figure Out” How To Handle The Clinton Foundation’s Conflicts Of Interest. CNN’S JEFF ZELENY: “Does she need to do more explaining, on some of these controversies like email and these other things or should she stop explaining.” VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: “Well I think she’s uh, I, I, Tim, my understanding is that she is going to make final judgement of what they are going to do with the Foundation, and just lay it all out and this is what is going to happen from this point on, this is who I am, this is what I’m going to do, I think that will be good.” ZELENY: “Has she not been clear enough?” BIDEN: “Well, it’s it’s been a moving target, I mean you look at the whole notion of how foundation’s function, is now all of the sudden being put in play like it never was before, so I am absolutely confident she is doing it by the book, and I think she is gonna figure out what she’s gonna say, crystal clear to the American people about the relationship between the family and the Foundation will be from this point forward.” (CNN, 9/6/16)Clinton Ally And Former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell (D) Said The Clinton Foundation Should “Disband” If Clinton Wins. “Former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D) said the Clinton Foundation should be disbanded if Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is elected to the White House. ‘I definitely think if she wins the presidency they have to disband it. I know it’ll be hard for President (Bill) Clinton because he cares very deeply about what the foundation has done,’ Rendell, a Clinton ally, told the New York Daily News.” (Rebecca Savranksy, “Rendell: Clinton Foundation Should Be Disbanded If Clinton Wins,” The Hill, 8/17/16)
Dem Senator Cardin: Clinton Foundation “Clearly Needs To Change The Way They Do Business.” FOX NEWS’ SHANNON BREAM:“Let's talk about the fact that the Clinton foundation has been abuzz this week. There’s been talk about a potential hack, potentially by Russian interests and there's been a statement by Bill Clinton that the foundation will no longer accept corporate money or foreign money if she's elected president. The Boston Globe said it should be shut down all together, it just creates a view of potential conflict of interest. They said in part, ‘The inherent conflict of interest was obvious when Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State in 2009. She promised to maintain a separation between her official work and the foundation, but recently released emails written by staffers during her State Department tenure make clear that the supposed partition was far from impregnable.’ They go on to say, listen, If the Foundation’s donors are truly motivated by altruism, and not by the lure of access to the Clintons, then surely the can find other ways to support the Foundation’s goals.’ Do you think the foundation should shut down altogether?” SENATOR BEN CARDIN (D-MD): “First, let's recognize what the foundation has been able to do. The Clinton Foundation has been able to help millions of people, over 10 million HIV aids alone saved countless lives. Its work is extremely important to global health. They’ve done some really great things. Now with Hillary Clinton being elected president, which we hope it will be, they clearly need to change the way they do business. They’ve indicated they will. They’re not going to accept any donations from foreign entities, they're going to change the way that the Clintons themselves interact with the foundation. Those decisions will be made appropriate to Hillary Clinton as president of the United States.” (Fox News’ “Fox News Sunday,” 8/21/16)
Clinton Supporter Rep. Grijalva (D-AZ) Called On Clinton To “Cut Off” The Clinton Foundation. MSNBC’S TAMRON HALL: “You also have The New York Times editorial today asking why the Clintons should cut ties to the Clinton Foundation. They say that the Clinton foundation has become a symbol of the Clintons’ laudable ambitions but also of their tangled alliances and operational opacity. The bottom line is that, when you look at polling it appears that the Clinton Foundation is hurting her, the perceived lack of transparency here. Do you believe it is time for her to do something different?” REPRESENTATIVE GRIJALVA (D-AZ): “Yeah, I do. And I think that there is a lot at stake in this election and I think if anybody knows that, it is Secretary Clinton. And I think her positions and the strength she’s been speaking to on issues is powerful and certainly has my support. But we’ve got to get rid of extraneous issues and if this Foundation is an extraneous issue that goes to the heart of whether it’s trust or transparency, then get rid of it because there is so much on the table right now for the American people and for the future of this nation, that extraneous issues such as the Foundation, which if that is something that needs to be cut off, then it should be cut off.” (MSNBC, 8/30/16)
Major Editorial Boards Have Called For Bill, Hillary And Chelsea Clinton To Leave The Clinton Foundation
The New York Times’ Editorial Board Said Bill, Hillary And Chelsea Clinton Should “End Their Operational Involvement In The Foundation And Its Affiliates For The Duration Of Her Presidency.” “A wiser course would be to ban contributions from foreign and corporate entities now. If Mrs. Clinton wins, Bill and Chelsea Clinton should both end their operational involvement in the foundation and its affiliates for the duration of her presidency, relinquishing any control over spending, hiring and board appointments.” (Editorial, “Cutting Ties To The Clinton Foundation,” The New York Times, 8/30/16)
The Boston Globe’s Editorial Board Called On The Clinton Foundation To Be Shut Down.” “Although the charity founded by former President Bill Clinton has done admirable work over the last 15 years, the Clinton Foundation is also clearly a liability for Hillary Clinton as she seeks the presidency. The once-and-maybe-future first family will have plenty to keep them busy next year if Hillary Clinton defeats Donald Trump in November. The foundation should remove a political — and actual — distraction and stop accepting funding. If Clinton is elected, the foundation should be shut down.” (Editorial, “Clinton Foundation Should Stop Accepting Funds,”Boston Globe, 8/16/16)
USA Today Editorial Headline: “Mothball The Clinton Foundation” (USA Today, 8/23/16)
The Washington Post Editorial Board Called On The Clinton Foundation To End All Ties To The Clintons Should Hillary Clinton Get Elected President. “Should Ms. Clinton win, all of that work and all of the foundation’s assets should be spun off to an organization with no ties to the first family.” (Editorial, “The Latest Clinton Emails Show What An Ethics Agreement Shouldn’t Look Like,” The Washington Post, 8/23/16)
The Los Angeles Times’ Editorial Board Called On Bill, Hillary And Chelsea To End Their Ties To The Clinton Foundation. “We would propose a differently solution: that the foundation continue but that the Clinton family sever its connection to it so long as Hillary Clinton is in the White House. That means not only Bill and Hillary Clinton but also Chelsea Clinton, who now serves as the foundation’s vice chair.” (Editorial, “It’s Time To Take The ‘Clinton’ Out Of The Clinton Foundation,” Los Angeles Times, 8/25/16)
The Minneapolis Star-Tribune Editorial Board Called On The Clintons To Shut Down The Clinton Foundation. “There is only one way to mitigate the damage at this point. As painful as it would be, the Clintons must shut down what until recently was known as the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. The half-measures being proposed don’t go far enough and leave the issue as one that will plague her until the last days of this election and perhaps beyond.” (Editorial, “It's Past Time To Shut Down The Clinton Foundation,” Minneapolis Star-Tribune, 8/26/16)
Spend, spend spend! Clinton campaign races through $50 million in just a MONTH - including cash for 35,700 TV ad spots
Hillary Clinton spent $645,000 more a day than her opponent Donald Trump last month, but has not been able to pull away from him in the race for the White House.
Illary is a shitting herself.
Illary is a shitting herself.
Just figured out why you are such a Hillary fan. Anti-semetic traitor.
List of Islamist Nations Who Gave Hillary $143 million in August Alone is Unreal:
Sep 19, 2016 by admin in DIASPORA Previous post
CNN praised Hillary Clinton this last week for raising $143 million dollars in the month of August from FOREIGN NATIONS!
She can’t get enough from Americans I guess!
Just who is giving her money and how much? Here is a start.
- Kingdom of Saudi Arabia $10-25 million
- State of Kuwait $5-10 million
- State of Qatar $1-5 million
- Sultanate of Oman $1-5 million
- United Arab Emirates $1-5 million
- Embassy of Algeria $250-500 Thousand
- Government of Brunei Darussalam $1-5million
You sick, racist, anti Semitic Islamophobic ass. Do you Heil Hitler to Drumpf every morning before you have your morning Vodka? I'm not a Hillary fan in the slightest, sicko.
I'm sure I'm a hypocrite at times, but I think you're overselling it. Can you tell me one time that I've "played both sides of the fence"? I do like to stir the pot, but my act isn't tired..yet. Maybe Zit can fire up a poll on whether my act is tired. I know that you, Vit, Ace, Dave, Joe, and Finch (I guess that's practically everyone) aren't fond of me, but I appeal to a certain demographic.
- Status
