Just listen to yourself. What kind of convoluted thinking is that?
Didn’t want to chance pissing off people by massacring them?
Why do you think they backed off? Because the 5,000 people showed em? It's kind of like when there is a high speed chase in a heavy populated area, sometimes you just back off for the good of the people. They backed off for the good of the people, not because they were scared.
Do you really think the BLM would open fire on the citizens of the U.S.?
What they did was to try to intimidate. When their bluff was called they left.
The fact that you used terms such as massacred and scared leads me to believe you watch to many cowboy and indian movies or you just have a vivid imagination.
The fact that 5.000 showed up to a pissing contest is real story.
No I am perplexed that they are so stupid or crazy that they would suggest physical violence. Especially in the Bundy case where they are dead wrong
If you claim to be a Libertarian you are more fringe than nut job conservatives. Unless you aren't really a Libertarian. Like one of my cousins is a young Libertarian. Reminds me more of a hippie than anything else.
Do you really think the BLM would open fire on the citizens of the U.S.?
What they did was to try to intimidate. When their bluff was called they left.
The fact that you used terms such as massacred and scared leads me to believe you watch to many cowboy and indian movies or you just have a vivid imagination.
The fact that 5.000 showed up to a pissing contest is real story.
No I don't believe they would open fire on them but I do believe some nut in the 5,000 would open fire causing a retaliation and a bloody mess. I can't believe you guys think that Bundy and the 5,000 are right in this.
Maybe it's because you're a partisan hack. :think:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
43 U.S.C. Section 1733, Subsection C:
"When the Secretary determines that assistance is necessary in enforcing Federal laws and regulations relating to the public lands or their resources he shall offer a contract to appropriate local officials having law enforcement authority within their respective jurisdictions with the view of achieving maximum feasible reliance upon local law enforcement officials in enforcing such laws and regulations.”
http://trac.syr.edu/laws/43/43USC01733.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What the federal oligarchy did was illegal, but this should hardly be a surprise coming from a government IS illegal.
I understand what you're saying, but it doesn't change the fact that Bundy is a scum bag.
Yeah the fringe of both parties is frightening. Definitely agree with you there. The scary part is the fringe seems to be growing on both sides.
Nobody ever suggested or advocated violence, except Dirty Harry's goons who showed up with guns threatening the ranchers.
The Attorney General and head of the IRS are currently in criminal contempt of Congress...and you're surprised growing numbers of people are in open revolt? face)(*^%
If the government doesn't have to follow the law (or rather picks and chooses which laws to follow AND abuses those laws to "punish our enemies"), why should the people respect those same laws?
Have you read the Declaration of Independence?
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States."
This federal oligarchy from top to bottom has lost it's moral right to govern. The more people realize this, the faster restoration can begin.
Yeah, that scumabg sniper on top of the bridge wasn't advocating violence. He was just there, passing the time of day. What a sick, sick ghost you are Casper.
Wrong, he was standing his ground against your overreaching Fedzilla.
Unfortunately, not enough people were awake back when your Fedzilla raided Gibson Guitars, otherwise there would have been hundreds on the rooftops doing the exact same thing.
Peaceful civil disobedience against an out of control federal oligarchy is patriotic.
Peaceful Civil disobedience is OWS. I am fine with Non Violent Civil Disobedience. Carry all the signs you want, chant all you want. Not Civil Disobedience at the end of a gun like you advocate, sicko.