Ken, I am curious your opinion on the 4 specific things I asked above. Big deal if he is organized and the books are all lumped together if the site has no credibility. What's your opinion on any of that if you are allowed to say. Should he say he doesn't take money from books on the front page if he does? Do you agree the player should have gotten stiffed in the CRIS thing? Do you agree with any of this? If you guys are on a "let's speak well about each others site" agreement I understand but if not lets hear your real opinion.
Pat,
You actually wrote all that? Wow! That is one of the longest posts I've ever seen.
Comical Pat, really funny stuff. The funniest part is YOU know 90% of that stuff you typed is garbage. You know it and I know it but you've twisted it like a true bitch just to try and score forum brownie points.
If that's all you could twist to bash sbr then I feel pretty good about things.
By the way Pat because I know how sincerely interested in the players you are, could you please list all the watchdogs, forums or any kind of player resource that has a better long or short term record for recommending the best sportsbooks than sbr?
Go ahead, how about listing 5 sites with a better track record than sbr? No, let's make it super easy...name one?
You see Pat, no one and no site is perfect. You can nit-pick all day and always find something or in your case twist something. No Pat, the proof is always in the pudding and sbr delivers more players to the books than any other site because players trust it based on a long and successful track history.
You actually wrote all that? Wow! That is one of the longest posts I've ever seen.
Comical Pat, really funny stuff. The funniest part is YOU know 90% of that stuff you typed is garbage. You know it and I know it but you've twisted it like a true bitch just to try and score forum brownie points.
If that's all you could twist to bash sbr then I feel pretty good about things.
By the way Pat because I know how sincerely interested in the players you are, could you please list all the watchdogs, forums or any kind of player resource that has a better long or short term record for recommending the best sportsbooks than sbr?
Go ahead, how about listing 5 sites with a better track record than sbr? No, let's make it super easy...name one?
You see Pat, no one and no site is perfect. You can nit-pick all day and always find something or in your case twist something. No Pat, the proof is always in the pudding and sbr delivers more players to the books than any other site because players trust it based on a long and successful track history.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Sodium Pentethol V:
Find one respected player that considers your ratings anything more than toilet paper, just one.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Can you elaborate a little on your position here? Is it that you feel some books are overrated, underrated or both?
Find one respected player that considers your ratings anything more than toilet paper, just one.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Can you elaborate a little on your position here? Is it that you feel some books are overrated, underrated or both?
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Boxing Freak:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Sodium Pentethol V:
Find one respected player that considers your ratings anything more than toilet paper, just one.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Can you elaborate a little on your position here? Is it that you feel some books are overrated, underrated or both?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I'd be happy just to hear what his definition of "respected player" is.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Sodium Pentethol V:
Find one respected player that considers your ratings anything more than toilet paper, just one.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Can you elaborate a little on your position here? Is it that you feel some books are overrated, underrated or both?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I'd be happy just to hear what his definition of "respected player" is.
SPXVII,
One respected player?? How about 5000 players a year. SBR was never meant for you know-it-alls. You smart guys all play at Camelot, BlueMarlin and NAB anyway. LMAO
Hal,
I know the good guys at PanAm are trying. But the owners are treating them like dogs and I for one saw no reason to be optimistic. For the owners not to come through with funds before the superbowl, well, that speaks volumes.
One respected player?? How about 5000 players a year. SBR was never meant for you know-it-alls. You smart guys all play at Camelot, BlueMarlin and NAB anyway. LMAO
Hal,
I know the good guys at PanAm are trying. But the owners are treating them like dogs and I for one saw no reason to be optimistic. For the owners not to come through with funds before the superbowl, well, that speaks volumes.
Buzzsaw: I have watched this debate since the GA situation and Blue Marlin situations happened, with you attempting to claim you somehow warned everyone.
All I actually see is you attacking people here, when they ask you specific points in particular (Pat's post especially), without attempting to answer the points at all.
So basically..don't bother refuting the points brought up, just scream and yell at the poster itself is your strategy?
Regardless of your intent, that would lend those of us watching this byplay to believe there is indeed credence to some part of the points being made. Without a reasonable answer by you, we just have to presume that any or all of them could be the valid point that is causing you to respond like this, instead of tackling the actual issues involved.
All I actually see is you attacking people here, when they ask you specific points in particular (Pat's post especially), without attempting to answer the points at all.
So basically..don't bother refuting the points brought up, just scream and yell at the poster itself is your strategy?
Regardless of your intent, that would lend those of us watching this byplay to believe there is indeed credence to some part of the points being made. Without a reasonable answer by you, we just have to presume that any or all of them could be the valid point that is causing you to respond like this, instead of tackling the actual issues involved.
Tab,
It's a free world Tab and if you believe the Pats and Peeps and BigMo's of forumville than more power to you. I'm not going to rehash every little point that Pat thinks is a mark against sbr. The CRIS deal Pat mentioned was what, two years ago???
I mean seriously, if you can't sniff out these guys envy and motive then fine. Have fun reading Pats envy-driven twisted, rambling 50,000 word manifestos on how evil sbr is. I'm sure not going to and I doubt anyone else is either.
It's a free world Tab and if you believe the Pats and Peeps and BigMo's of forumville than more power to you. I'm not going to rehash every little point that Pat thinks is a mark against sbr. The CRIS deal Pat mentioned was what, two years ago???
I mean seriously, if you can't sniff out these guys envy and motive then fine. Have fun reading Pats envy-driven twisted, rambling 50,000 word manifestos on how evil sbr is. I'm sure not going to and I doubt anyone else is either.
