Roger Goodell is disgusting phony fraud.

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,615
Tokens
just like everything in life, you're all ass backwards

the evidence convicted OJ, the evidence exonerates the Patriots in deflategate

you just can't think

I believe the judge ruled that the NFL isn't allowed to suspend someone for being aware of others cheating, not that the evidence exonerated him.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
These Pats fans are still convinced that NO ONE in the Pats organization did anything to those footballs. Not even those 2 "equipment managers".

Those two equip mgrs. were suspended by the NFL.....Have since been reinstated and are still employed by the Pats. Whats that tell ya. They had nothing on them after 4 or 5 intense investigative interviews by the NFL.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
I believe the judge ruled that the NFL isn't allowed to suspend someone for being aware of others cheating, not that the evidence exonerated him.

Don't forget that the court was handpicked by the NFL.

Part of judges opinion that Tom Brady was suspended for being "probably aware" was laughable and the judge basically said so.Whether Goodell has the power to suspend or not.
. In other words the Wells investigation came up with the same conclusion that a Brady hating Colt fan in bum fuck Indiana came up with.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
3,375
Tokens
Those two equip mgrs. were suspended by the NFL.....Have since been reinstated and are still employed by the Pats. Whats that tell ya.

Are you positive they were suspended by the NFL? Positive? IDK. I thought I remember the Pats making the move to do that.

And what does that tell me? Nothing. They were never fired by the Pats nor the NFL. So it was obvious from the beginning NE had no plans of firing them.

To be honest, I could not care less about the subject. These new "facts" you guys talk about. Dont know. Dont care.

Lot's of smoking guns lying around though. Why were all of Indy's balls found to be fine during the game and not the Patriots? :think2:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Lot's of smoking guns lying around though. Why were all of Indy's balls found to be fine during the game and not the Patriots? :think2:

They were NOT....3 of 4 Colts balls that were tested by the NFL were BELOW reg. PSI.....The NFL excuse for not testing them all was "didn't have time" to test the rest....Thats in the WELLS report.
There were also 2 gauges used and no one remembers including the refs which gauges were used to test the balls.

So the NFL said that was enough to smear the career of the face of the NFL.....fuckin absurd.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
19,471
Tokens
Rumor is the Pats inflate balls to 10.84 PSI then put the balls in the dryer for 01:17:25 to heat the air in the balls up to a legal limit

One Ref asked about the hot balls and they passed it off as a break in procedure Tom has
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,908
Messages
13,575,089
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com