Rivals rip Dean

Search

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
Sharpton targets ex-governor's hiring practices, endorsements

By George E. Condon Jr. and Toby Eckert
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

January 12, 2004

DES MOINES, Iowa – Howard Dean came under heavy attack last night in the final Democratic debate before the crucial Iowa caucuses Jan. 19 and was forced to defend his hiring practices as governor and his statements about the Confederate flag and the role of the caucuses.

Participating in a debate designed to focus on issues important to blacks and Latinos, Dean clashed with several of the other candidates on race, war and taxes.

The exchanges were noticeably more spirited than those seen in most of the nearly two dozen debates that preceded the showdown in Iowa's capital city.

New polls show former Vermont governor Dean and Rep. Richard Gephardt of Missouri locked in a tight battle for first place and Sens. John Kerry of Massachusetts and John Edwards of North Carolina scrapping for third place.

A Zogby tracking poll of Iowa Democrats out yesterday put Dean at 25 percent and Gephardt at 23 percent. Kerry was third at 15 percent, edging Edwards, who was at 14 percent.

The poll, taken for MSNBC and Reuters, was conducted Thursday through Saturday and surveyed 500 Democrats who said they are likely to vote at the caucuses.

The eight candidates gathered at the Des Moines Convention Center for a "Brown and Black Presidential Forum," which was broadcast by MSNBC and hosted by the network's Lester Holt and Maria Celeste Arraras of the Spanish-language network Telemundo. Retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark is not competing in Iowa and did not take part in last night's debate.

For the first time in the debates, the prime target was not President Bush. This time, Dean was under almost constant fire.

The first question brought up Dean's remark four years ago that the Iowa caucuses were primarily for extremists. The remark was unearthed last week.

"That was something that was said four years ago and I, frankly, think that people are a little tired about who said what four years ago or who said what six years ago or 10 years ago," he said last night.

Dean then seemed a little flustered when activist Al Sharpton pressed him on his hiring record during his years as governor.

"You keep talking about race," Sharpton said. "In the state of Vermont . . . not one black or brown (person) held a senior policy position, not one."

Dean quickly stated that Sharpton's numbers were wrong and challenged his source. But Sharpton would not back down, and repeatedly pushed Dean to say if he had any minority members in his Cabinet. Finally, Dean relented and responded, "No, we did not."

When Dean tried to defend himself again, Sharpton cut him off, saying, "If you want to lecture people on race, you ought to have the background and track record in order to do that."

When the moderator asked Dean about his earlier appeal for the votes of Southerners who drive trucks with Confederate flag decals, Dean called the flag "a painful symbol to African-Americans" and tried to change his target to "NASCAR dads."

But Edwards, the only Southerner in the group last night, pounced on Dean, saying the flag is also repugnant to whites and mocking Dean's promise to promote more conversations on race among whites.

"This is not just about talk; this is about doing something," Edwards said. "This is not conversation; this is about creating real equality."

Former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun, who rarely said a contrary word in any of the earlier debates, criticized Edwards as being too supportive of Bush, Gephardt as ineffective in Congress and Sharpton for provoking what she called "a racial screaming match" with Dean.

Edwards rebutted her with voting numbers, and Gephardt blamed Republicans in the House. But Sharpton fired back: "I've heard throughout this campaign . . . the governor lecture us on race. To ask him his own record is not a racial screaming match; it is to make one accountable to what they said."

Sharpton also mocked Dean for talking about his endorsements from black and Latino leaders. "You only need co-signers if your credit is bad," Sharpton said.

Under fire from Kerry and Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut for his insistence on repealing all of Bush's tax cuts, Dean has promised to come up with a tax plan to help the middle class. But Dean said his top priority is to balance the budget and suggested that any tax relief would have to wait.

The debate also had its moments of humor. When Lieberman asked a seemingly endless question, Kerry joked that it "lasted longer than a Britney Spears marriage." And when asked about Bush's plan to go to the moon and Mars, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio suggested that perhaps the president is "looking for the weapons of mass destruction" there since they have not been found in Iraq.

Because of the debate, it was a relatively light campaign day for the other candidates despite the dwindling number of days before the caucuses.

The most surprising development in the race was the unexpected endorsement of Edwards by The Des Moines Register, the state's most influential newspaper. The Register acknowledged that Edwards lacks the experience of most of the other candidates, but it said he is superior to them.

"John Edwards is one of those rare, naturally gifted politicians who doesn't need a long record of public service to inspire confidence in his abilities," the newspaper said.

www.signonsandiego.com
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
Sharpton went on to imply that Dean should have "imported" minorities from other states to fill the positions in Dean cabinet in Vermont.

Kinda like slavery?

These folks are truly very pitiful people, trying to lead a sad and dying political party. I could see the ignorant voting for one of these dips solely as one issue voters; but knowing as much as say, lander knows, I would have to consider lander stupid. And stupid is not curable with knowledge.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,146
Tokens
"I would have to consider lander stupid. And stupid is not curable with knowledge."

LMAO!!
applaudit.gif


"Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man." - The Dude, 1998
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
JP, so according to you, anyone who votes for the Dem candidate against Bush in 2004 is either "ignorant" or "stupid". Is that what you're saying?

Hardly a dying political party given that when national polls ask what part they consider themselves it's always right around 40/40/20 rep/dem/indep...just like it's been for quite awhile. Dems are dying no more than Repubs were when Clinton was in office who had, on average, higher approval ratings than Bush. In fact, Clinton's ratings never got as low as Bush's did on 2 separate ocassions, even post 9-11, and even w/o an intern blowjob scandal.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Floyd Gondolli:
"I would have to consider lander stupid. And stupid is not curable with knowledge."

LMAO!!
applaudit.gif


"Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man." - The Dude, 1998<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Brilliant Floyd & Joint - has calling dissent "stupid" the new Neo-Conical McCartyism flavor of the month? To be perfectly honest, I think this is a let down from opting to call opposition "unpatriotic" instead of, say, actually debating so that logic and reason may surface, like traditional democracy would do.

Ok, let me try this ...
Floyd - you're stupidER ..

Well, I guess that settles it - my political views are clearly well informed and undeniably correct because, after all, stupidER beats stupid.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Thank God for the military - fruitcakes like you would never make it in the intellectual business world.
icon_rolleyes.gif


I just hope one of these children doesn't come up with "stupidEST" or I'll be relegated to using "infinately stupid" and "more stupid than stupidest". Fortunately, while those last phrases have no logical backbone they, oddly enough, seem to conform quite well with the delusions and illogic of the right wing.
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
D2bets,

If your going to follow the polls rather than the reality of the fact that the republicans control the Senate, House and White House then keep your head in the sand if you like. Its been years since the republicans have controlled all three - don't know for sure but something like fifty years. So what direction do you think were going now? Just the facts.

Call me a neo con or whatever you want. I haven't even bothered to attempt to learn what a neo con is other than reading one of Phaedrus' posts on the subject. If thinking Reagan was the greatest president of all time, than I am whatever you want to define me as.

Am not a big Bush supporter but I do support the war on Bin Laden and Saddam and their cronies and I do support the tax cuts. Other than that Bush is just a bit better than Clinton on domestic policies.

Another thing you libs have to remember is it wasn't just a blowjob scandal. He cigar fuvked the intern. If you libs would include that every time you say the Clinton scandal was just about sex you'de look less protective of clinton. Just say "it was about getting a blowjob and cigar ****ing his intern." Much more clear. But no its always just the blowjob. Nothing about the cigar ****ing the intern. PERVERT
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
JP,

for a guy that goes by the handle of Joint Pleasure you seem to be awfully put out over the way Monica and Bill received their joint pleasure.
icon_smile.gif
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
You don't get it Mudbone. As long as you libs keep saying clinton was impeached because he recieved a blowjob then lets take the act a little further and lets picture the old WC Feilds sticking that plant in and out of a white house interns ****. The fact is he lied under oath - which is perjury - which is not something the chief law enforcement officer should be allowed to do. He was impeached because of that act.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
JP,

I could've cared less if he was forced out of presidency or not, Gore could've run the country better IMO. I was just making an attempt at humor. Couldn't care less about Bill, can't stand Hillary.

But it was surreal how Whitewater comittee wandered from a failed investigation to the sex charges. What a waste of taxpayer money and effort, all in a purely partisan political play. Roughly at the same time, conservative family value hero Newt Gingrich was telling his wife on her deathbed, he was leaving her for a younger woman.

Btw, I'd rather be lied to about the sexual shennaigans of the President than be lied to about the reasons for going war to Iraq. The first one costs one man his dignity, the 2nd lie costs American servicemen and women their lives.
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
Mudbone,

Who lied to you about the reasons for going to war in Iraq?

I know someone who went to a doctor for menopausal symptoms. The doctor prescribed hormone therapy and assured her that the hormone therapy was "proven" safe. She later died of breast cancer. Further "research" has now been proven a link between hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer.

Did the lady doctor lie to her patient?


A fair analogy assuming we do not find WMD in Iraq.
But Mudbone - there is a lot of sand in Iraq. Things can be buried under sand. I've seen the map. My brother flies for the Air force and has flown missions over Afganistan and Iraq doing battle. I haven't asked him, but I'm sure he's seen a lot of sand over the middle East the last couple years. The technology exists and has existed in Iraq to dig these holes in the sand. Saddam was found in a hole. Democrats in this country are digging their own hole and the earth is quickly devouring them under the acreage of the United States of America.

There are many other places on earth that still welcome democrats so you can always move
icon_smile.gif


If the republicans win big in 2004. The democrats will not take over the White House for at least a generation. You heard it hear first a couple weeks ago. I heard Rush Limbaugh stating that today on the radio as well. Didn't know he read my posts
toast.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
JP,

plz don't tell me you believe that:

There were links to saddam and al-qaeda
There were WMD

you really honestly, deep down believe the Administration felt that when they had no evidence (well` fabricated evidence since discredited about the WMD) to suupport either one?

Also, not sure why Republicans are so confident these days. If I recall the presidential election was pretty damn close, with Gore actually receiving more of the popular vote than Bush.

Just as an aside, could there be a bigger freakin' hypocrite around today than pill-poppin' Limbaugh?
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
The were and still are WMD and there are links to Al Quida. I don't have to believe in it, as it is not a religion. It's just fact based, with no bias to see it either way.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,179
Messages
13,565,007
Members
100,755
Latest member
fb68winn
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com