Rich Rodriguez's unorthodox new contract could open Pandora's Box...

Search

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
This is all starting to get ridiculous. Ninty five percent of the coaches out there aren't worth anywhere near the money they are getting paid as it is. And now this deal, which looks pretty shady to me. Fun days ahead guys. Coaches who own half the city and well paid football players are coming. Just a reflection of a society who priorities have gone haywire...












Rich Rodriguez's Unorthodox New Contract Could Open Pandora's Box

By Adam Kramer , National College Football Lead Writer Jun 2, 2014


cd1dfb9797101023860d73c98143c505_crop_north.jpg
















What if, as part of its courting of Nick Saban, Texas was able to offer him an enormous salary—say $7 million a season—and ownership in a handful of gas stations spread throughout the state as a cherry on top?
What if—in an effort to keep Kevin Sumlin from dashing for the NFL—Texas A&M backed up a Brinks truck of guaranteed dollars and threw in a small percentage of ownership in a line of car dealerships spread throughout the Lone Star State?
Hypothetical? Certainly. Outrageous? Perhaps not anymore, or at the very least it appears to be where we’re trending.
In a decidedly copycat sport—from uniforms, to scheduling, to salaries, to facilities—Rich Rodriguez’s new contract at Arizona could serve as an icebreaker, a lightbulb moment for administrations and boosters to form an lucrative alliance.
The money, according to Sports Illustrated’s Andy Staples, is just lovely by its lonesome. Rodriguez’s new five-year contract will net him $2.2 million per season. This contract is also incentive-laced, including triggers like a $200,000 bonus for winning the Pac-12 South and a $1 million bonus for winning a national championship.
This is nothing groundbreaking, of course. Shoot-for-the-moon incentives have become a fixture in the coaching world, and the Rodriguez deal is no different. It’s the other aspect of this contract, however, that could soon set a blueprint to follow, for better or worse. At one point in time, incentives were a trailblazing addition to coaching fine print. Now, such contract clauses could have company.
hi-res-b032ea0ec63de456f418cbf86d232b6b_crop_exact.jpg

Ross D. Franklin/Associated Press

An Arizona donor has helped pad this deal further, offering up equity to Rodriguez, basketball coach Sean Miller and athletic director Greg Byrne. This “major university benefactor"—as outlined by the Board of Regents—has offered 500,000 units of a master limited partnership. Each unit is currently valued at $35.36 for a total of $17,680,000.
Rodriguez was granted 175,000 units of the 500,000, which equates to $6,188,000 right now. The only caveat for him to cash in on such options is that he has to stay at the school for eight years to receive this payout, whatever it becomes. If the price of the unit goes up in that time, his payout will go up; if the company struggles and the units drop in value, his payouts decrease.
Unlike any coaching contract until now—at least the deals being celebrated publicly—this fluctuating incentive is not tied to record or national championships. It’s built on longevity, a strategic attempt to slow down the coaching carousel and keep the Wildcats coach on the same sideline a while longer.
It is both brilliant and vaguely alarming, mainly because there’s no telling what’s next. If there’s one thing we know about this sport, it rarely stops with the first move. The one-upping is consistent and expected, and that could certainly be the case here.
As FootballScoop.com points out, universities around the country are playing close attention:
Rodriguez could, in theory, be among the wealthiest coaches in college football - with only a small portion of that wealth coming from Arizona's athletic budget.
In talking with both coaches and agents within college football, there is no question how massive this contract clause could be within the profession. The word "game-changer" was used by multiple sources. It is impossible to overstate the proverbial eyebrow raise this news caused among college football's top-tier coaching ranks.
This sport has money buried in the mattress, tucked away in safes and stored out of sight in offshore accounts. It’s not just the coaches, athletics directors and television money padding the pockets of school employees, either. It’s the alums standing patiently on the sideline next to their Scrooge McDuck vaults, anxious to spend their money and perhaps buy a winning program.
It’s why stadiums are being upgraded around the country at a greater pace than ever, why college locker rooms now have waterfalls and why football facilities are starting to look more like five-star hotels and less like buildings dedicated to collegiate athletics. The money is flowing—sometimes from relatively mysterious avenues—and teams are taking full advantage by spending it.
Even though booster impact has long been a part of college football, the ante has been upped in recent years. This latest move by Arizona brings the entities a little bit closer, however, and the results are to be determined.
hi-res-053a023031a9fe2ea458dbad85bcba55_crop_exact.jpg

Rick Scuteri/Associated Press

If wealthy donors are poised and willing to offer up equity in their companies to individuals, the entire coaching landscape could theoretically change. In a sport built on competitive advantages—i.e. whoever has the most money—this is just another way to widen the gap between those programs with remarkable means and everybody else.
On the bright side, this new-found equity could help stabilize the coaching carousel, which has become especially active and volatile in recent years. If coaches have a reason to stay, then perhaps they won’t sprint from campus to campus as often.
Or, perhaps the booster involvement will escalate to the point where equity is now assumed in certain deals from certain teams—a part of the regular ol’ pitch to coaches during the yearly reshuffle. That’s where this brilliant endeavor could grow teeth.
It might not be a matter of where you are or how much your athletic department profited in a given season, but rather if you’re on the good side of a one-percenter willing to share. At a time where the sport is becoming seemingly more corporate, the direct influence of corporations becoming the negotiators only elevates this to another level.
Perhaps what’s most concerning, however, is that this sport rarely stops to admire moderation.
It doesn’t stop with 500,000 shares, not when there are wealthy alums sitting quietly in the back willing to double this investment if and when the time is right. With as much money and resources as some of these wealthy donors have to offer—some of the wealthiest individuals in the world—there’s no telling where this movement might take us.
If Rich Rodriguez—an outstanding college football coach—has already set a steep market, what happens when one of the nation’s elite signal-callers and recruiters get involved?
We'll likely find out soon enough.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
And while I'm on the subject of overpaid coaches, I agree 100% with this list:





10 Most Overpaid College Football Coaches






51cbb4b8f23610a182ddf28ef54ddd04b53c205c.jpeg
1.Butch Jones, Tennessee ($3.2 million)

We're not suggesting Butch Jones is a lousy coach. It's just that he hasn't proven anything at Tennessee yet to deserve this pay. Jones is no Nick Saban. He doesn't have a background of winning at the major college level. A coach shouldn't be paid this type of money to start off at any school unless they are a proven major college winner. Jones is not.


857401ef4bce7c9a39e85f172ec7bc398d242627.jpeg
2.Kirk Ferentz, Iowa ($4 million)

Kirk Ferentz has done many great things at Iowa. His Hawkeyes have finished in the Top 10 nationally 4 times, won a BCS bowl, and shared 2 Big-10 titles in 15 seasons in Iowa City. The problem is most of his Iowa squads have been average or worse. Since 2010, Iowa has won 8,7,4, and 8 games. That's 4 seasons with no Top 25 finishes and no 9-win seasons. When the coach is making $4 million per year, that simply isn't acceptable.


8a77dfa76c1347e6664e7f2ed70c5309f3141a62.jpeg
3. Tommy Tuberville, Cincinnati ($3.2 million)

First off, Cincinnati isn't a major college program. Paying a coach $3.2 million at a mid-major is a bit silly. Even worse, Tuberville hasn't had much success as a head coach in quite some time. He was fired at Auburn after the 2008 season and then didn't have much success at Texas Tech. He certainly doesn't deserve a salary anywhere near $3.2 million annually.




7a42cd89559aea3178c1a3de31182eab9ad69227.jpeg
4.Will Muschamp, Florida ($3 million)

Muschamp was an excellent defensive coordinator at Texas, and was in line to replace Mack Brown. Instead, he replaced Urban Meyer at Florida. Things haven't gone so well for him and he's lucky to still be employed. If 2014 isn't a successful one in Gainesville, Muschamp better start packing his bags.


234a728a5979ecb5fccaffe0cd006b633ee485cc.jpeg
5.Steve Sarkisian, USC ($4.25 million)

Steve Sarkisian wasn't a bad hire by USC, but perhaps they could have done better. After all, they are USC. Sarkisian had moderate success at Washington, and now takes over a USC program that is only a few years removed from greatness. USC probably overpaid for him, however. $4.25 million per year is high for a coach that has never led a team to a major bowl.


994ceedf085f6c8a8a90a4c54515ab0e1b2d692e.jpeg
6.Charlie Weis, Kansas ($2.5 million)

Weis has now made his way onto the overpaid coaches list at 2 schools. Props to him. Weis simply doesn't win as a head coach. But he continually gets high-paying gigs. Again, props to him. Kansas is a difficult place to win, so we understand their need to overpay to get a good head football coach. However, Charlie isn't a good head football coach.


0624937b0f956cc78385886461b69eb7c3597e3f.jpeg
7.Todd Graham, Arizona State ($2.5 million)

Todd Graham embarrassed himself on the way out the door at Pittsburgh. He pulled a "Lane Kiffin". The fact of the matter is Graham isn't that great of a coach. His salary is merely average by major college standards. But he hasn't even proven so much to be an average head coach. Why Arizona State went to great lengths to hire this guy is beyond us.


db24873b75d9ddfdadd680198465f83fe07afca4.jpeg
8.Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ($4 million)

Brian Kelly is a solid football coach, but overrated. He's had moderate success at Notre Dame, with the peak performance a national championship game appearance. Kelly came to Notre Dame with a ton of hype (like every ND coach before him), but really hasn't delivered up to the ridiculous expectations Notre Dame fans had. At least he's better than Charlie Weis...


c27379aa68466f093227ce1fb1df7843cc460d35.jpeg
9.Brady Hoke, Michigan ($4.3 million)

When Michigan hired Brady Hoke to replace Rich Rodriguez in 2011, he was seen as the next Lloyd Carr. After leading Michigan to a Sugar Bowl victory in his first year and then signing a Top 5 recruiting class, Michigan fans envisioned national titles. Things haven't gone so well for the Big Blue since then. They've been overmatched in many games the past couple of years and now you have to wonder if Hoke really is the right man for the job.


5112a608f7b2a6b54730755b5ca8e9025b7bf3e6.jpeg
10.Paul Rhoads, Iowa State ($1.8 million)

We'll give Rhoads some credit. He's good at one thing; giving locker room speeches. He's just not that good at being a head coach. Iowa State is a lousy football program, but Rhoads isn't doing anything to improve the on-field quality. Iowa State football attendance has increased and revenue is up. But in terms of wins and losses, this guy simply isn't getting the job done and he probably never will.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
GS,

I am with you, I completely agree with this list as well. Don't understand paying TT at UC and Butch Jones this kind of money. Kelly is vastly overrated.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
GS,

I am with you, I completely agree with this list as well. Don't understand paying TT at UC and Butch Jones this kind of money. Kelly is vastly overrated.
I've never really understood the big contracts before a coach actually proves something on the field. I see a few of these coaches possibly having potential, but very little proof than any of them deserve their current salaries. Everything is based on the future and what they are supposed to do for the school and team. That's where these schools make their biggest mistakes in hiring coaches. Weis is a good example. Hell, I still believe these coaches should be making under a million for what they do and the limited skills they have. If all of the schools got together and said for here on out we aren't offering any coach more than a $500,000 a year contract, do you think they would turn it down? Hell no! What else could 95% of these coaches do outside of football that would earn them more than a hundred grand a year? Maybe somebody with multiple degrees like Urban Meyer could earn the bucks. Or maybe a coach who has the gift of gab to go into broadcasting. But for the rest of them...forget it.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
-- borrowed from a favorite Broadway production....

"When you're rich they think you really know."
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,381
Tokens
Hoke only 9th?

what's wild about Ferentz's contract is the buyout clause. If Iowa wanted him gone they'd have to pay him nearly $3m/year for every year through 2020. When you start doing the division of dollars per conference win it's hideous. L4 years he's banked roughly $16M and they've won 15 conference games (15-17) in a really mediocre conference. Don't think Iowa was expecting $1M per Big 10 win when they extended him...then again he's only gone 6-2 or better 3x in 15 years
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Interesting fact: The highest paid government employee is the football coach for Navy.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,115,368
Messages
13,523,716
Members
100,264
Latest member
hhill
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com