Republican committee chairs officially ask for PERJURY probe of Hillary Clinton

[The Guesser]

She did commit them... he said so. But refused to press charges.

Actually that's not what he said. You are leaving out the word "Potential".
"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information....."
And in the Witchhunt, waste of time hearings the next day, he amplified, as per FactCheck. But your side has a no lose scenario always. Charged = Guilty, Not charged = Guilty but the fix was in. As a Bettor, you know they pay out on the actual result, not what you wanted the result to be.

But later in the hearing, Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman asked Comey if he knew that the State Department had said that the emails were marked classified in error. Comey replied, “No.”

Likewise, Rep. Matt Cartwright, also a Democrat, asked Comey if the emails were properly classified, and Comey said they were not. (Executive Order 13526 spells out how documents should be properly classified, including a header on the document clearly identifying the email as classified as “confidential,” “secret” or “top secret.”)
Cartwright asked if Clinton could have missed the improper markings. Comey said that that was possible.

Cartwright, July 7: So, if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified and we’re following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
​

 

[NFLTrends]

Actually that's not what he said. You are leaving out the word "Potential". And in the Witchhunt, waste of time hearings the next day, he amplified, as per FactCheck. But your side has a no lose scenario always. Charged = Guilty, Not charged = Guilty but the fix was in. As a Bettor, you know they pay out on the actual result, not what you wanted the result to be.

[FONT="]But later in the hearing, Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman [URL="http://www.c-span.org/video/?412315-1/fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-hillary-clinton-email-probe&start=11016"]asked[/URL] Comey if he knew that the State Department had said that the emails were marked classified in error. Comey replied, “No.”[/FONT]
[FONT="]Likewise, Rep. Matt Cartwright, also a Democrat, [URL="http://www.c-span.org/video/?412315-1/fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-hillary-clinton-email-probe&start=6685"]asked[/URL] Comey if the emails were properly classified, and Comey said they were not. (Executive Order 13526 spells out how documents should be properly classified, including a header on the document clearly identifying the email as classified as “confidential,” “secret” or “top secret.”)[/FONT]
[FONT="]Cartwright asked if Clinton could have missed the improper markings. Comey said that that was possible.[/FONT]

Cartwright, July 7: So, if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified and we’re following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
​

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions....."

 

[The Guesser]

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions....."

You can repeat that statement until the cows come home, it doesn't say what you think it says, that what Hillary did rose to the level of a crime.
Like I said, a person who did what Hillary did, might have lost a day of annual leave, as punishment for their stupidity. But no crime, as bad as you guys NEED to have one.

 

[festeringZit]

You can repeat that statement until the cows come home, it doesn't say what you think it says, that what Hillary did rose to the level of a crime.
Like I said, a person who did what Hillary did, might have lost a day of annual leave, as punishment for their stupidity. But no crime, as bad as you guys NEED to have one.

Hillary could have slit Chelsea's throat on live TV and you'd be in here defending her.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

If you say so my man.

I'm pretty sure it isn't a lack of "thinking at all". I try to be as thoughtful as possible. Maybe it's because I'm bipolar or a right wing loon. Has to be one of those two.

It’s not Vit, it’s everyone else. Especially you. )^&&

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Hillary could have slit Chelsea's throat on live TV and you'd be in here defending her.

 

[vitterd]

For someone who keeps claiming to be ignoring me.....dave007 has now said "vit" more times than almost anyone this week.

Thanks dave007!!! Keep up with this delusion that you're ignoring meointer:

 

[vitterd]

Hillary could have slit Chelsea's throat on live TV and you'd be in here defending her.

And she could cure cancer and you'd be calling her a vile whore.

Stay classy!!

 

[The Guesser]

Hillary could have slit Chelsea's throat on live TV and you'd be in here defending her.

Hardly, since you yourself have pointed out posts where I've savaged Hillary. I am capable of seeing both sides, you NEVER. But You are a phony fraud Fake Religious liar, so that's what you do.

 

[vitterd]

Hardly, since you yourself have pointed out posts where I've savaged Hillary. I am capable of seeing both sides, you NEVER. But You are a phony fraud Fake Religious liar, so that's what you do.

Zit is having one of his worst months here.....still trying to make up for that poll that blew up in his face.

But his "liar" and "mentally ill" posts are really something to see.

Guy is a total fucking idiot who is a troll machine living in his own private, miserable hell.

 

[festeringZit]

Hardly, since you yourself have pointed out posts where I've savaged Hillary. I am capable of seeing both sides, you NEVER. But You are a phony fraud Fake Religious liar, so that's what you do.

Yup, you are right on this one. You have seen that Hillary is a sleazy fucking liar in the past, so now
you're going to claim she's telling the truth?

 

[festeringZit]

Zit is having one of his worst months here.....still trying to make up for that poll that blew up in his face.

But his "liar" and "mentally ill" posts are really something to see.

Guy is a total fucking idiot who is a troll machine living in his own private, miserable hell.

Poll was a huge success, showed exactly what I thought it would. Countless people in here see you for what you are, a useless troll.

Oh BTW, you whine and cry like a little beeeeatch.

 

[vitterd]

Poll was a huge success, showed exactly what I thought it would. Countless people in here see you for what you are, a useless troll.

Oh BTW, you whine and cry like a little beeeeatch.

85 percent right wingers.....40 percent in one poll( a poll designed to get me 5 percent)

your poll I won 100 percent of the normal vote.....subtract the known loons and two ghosts.....it's +50 percent.


Vitterd nation has spoken and spoken loudly......


I prob did better than you or Joe would and most people here think like you two dolts.

 

[jimmythegreek]

Republican committee chairs officially ask for PERJURY probe of Hillary Clinton​


lock her up.

 

[festeringZit]

85 percent right wingers.....40 percent in one poll( a poll designed to get me 5 percent)

your poll I won 100 percent of the normal vote.....subtract the known loons and two ghosts.....it's +50 percent.


Vitterd nation has spoken and spoken loudly......


I prob did better than you or Joe would and most people here think like you two dolts.

Not 85% right winders, complete lie made up by the site pathological liar.

I already exposed you for making this lie. Try again?

 

[vitterd]

Not 85% right winders, complete lie made up by the site pathological liar.

I already exposed you for making this lie. Try again?

It could be more......just read offshore forum and here. It's obvious.

What expose? You said it isn't and your word is dogshit.

Vitterd Nation is here to stay. The polls have spoken.

I guess those 3 people who left because of me didn't vote

 

[The Guesser]

Yup, you are right on this one. You have seen that Hillary is a sleazy fucking liar in the past, so now
you're going to claim she's telling the truth?

I take each case and the facts based upon it. She was stupid for what she did setting up the email syatem, and I said it at the time. But it was not criminal, as the facts have shown. She did nothing wrong in the Benghazi tragedy. As the facts have shown numerous times.
When she lies, I recognize it, when she doesn't, I recognize it. Same with Obama. Same with Drumpf, who I have complimented on those rare occassions where he displays sanity. It's what being an objective person is, something you and your ilk sorely lack, and why you are total hypocrites, with no integrity whatoever.

 

[vitterd]

I take each case and the facts based upon it. She was stupid for what she did setting up the email syatem, and I said it at the time. But it was not criminal, as the facts have shown. She did nothing wrong in the Benghazi tragedy. As the facts have shown numerous times.
When she lies, I recognize it, when she doesn't, I recognize it. Same with Obama. Same with Drumpf, who I have complimented on those rare occassions where he displays sanity. It's what being an objective person is, something you and your ilk sorely lack, and why you are total hypocrites, with no integrity whatoever.

Spot on

 

[NFLTrends]

I take each case and the facts based upon it. She was stupid for what she did setting up the email syatem, and I said it at the time. But it was not criminal, as the facts have shown. She did nothing wrong in the Benghazi tragedy. As the facts have shown numerous times.
When she lies, I recognize it, when she doesn't, I recognize it. Same with Obama. Same with Drumpf, who I have complimented on those rare occassions where he displays sanity. It's what being an objective person is, something you and your ilk sorely lack, and why you are total hypocrites, with no integrity whatoever.

So did she commit perjury? All the evidence is there.....

 

[The Guesser]

So did she commit perjury? All the evidence is there.....

I certainly don't think so, and I don't think there's any evidence to indicate perjury. Stupidity and arrogance does not equal perjury. But that won't stop yet ANOTHER Political Witch Hunt that wastes millions of taxpayer $$$$ to find out. And when/if that wild gose chase produces the usual nothing, we'll hear the same Bullshit we always do when the results don't go a certain way, the fix was in. And then, on to the next Political Witch Hunt that wastes millions of taxpayer $$$$.