You are digging your own grave for showing that you know nothing about what you are trying to attack
First of all , there are other isotopes that are used for radiometric dating that allow to go back much further than 60k years
Second, methods used to estimate the age of the universe don't rely on radiometric dating
the best part is that you try to play sarcastic by saying "you do know how many thousands blabla" :lolBIG:
if you truly want to know about this and other 'crazy' ideas that according to you 'are all bs' you have no excuse.
you can read articles on how its done, you can go to any university that has a physics/astronomy department and ASK
boy I am glad you are not gullible
btw I am not playing the 'know it all' I am simply making a point on how all these threads have the 'this is BS' yet the person that claims that has made absolutely ZERO effort to research about what they are talking about NOR do they understand the elementary principles of what they are talking and believe they can use the 'its my faith' get out of jail card when it turns ugly
another pitiful 'get out of jail' card, nothing is 'infallible' therefore 'its all bs' and 'I am right'
:lolBIG:
LOL, fletch, I enjoy reading your posts, I think you're an intelligent guy. It shocked me a little that you don't know the difference between you're and your, but it's cool. We don't share the same beliefs, no worries.
As someone (me) who also believes in God, Creation (not the Genesis version, though) and Jesus, I invite you to consider the notion that all men are loved by God and all will be forgiven of any errors.
So regardless of how one perceives the creation of the universe, you're going to be okay in God's eyes. All errors (aka - sins) are forgiven.
Spelling isnt a problem but sometimes i get lazy and dont use the proper grammar. Its not a question of not knowing it, it just a matter of not taking the time to do it properly. And as far as beliefs, i prefer to deal in logic. Beliefs get people killed. And unless its in a state of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, evolution is always going on. It just takes many many many million years for you to see tangible results. Humans have been here for what 200k years? that is nothing in 4 billion years on earth. You're a smelly pirate hooker.
Reading comprehension would be a good place for you to start. I don't think I said, "I'm right" or, "it's all BS...." More of, "it's what I believe, and it's my faith." Sorry if it offends you.
When a monkey turns into a human, and it's documented, in any lifetime, let me know. Apparently that stopped at some point in the BILLIONS of years of history.
Hey guys I know there are some Christians around here. I've asked a few friends this question (1 Jew about 4 Christians) and I can't get an answer. Anyway I ask them about Adam and Eve's children. If there was only Adam and Eve at first then they had children, was all further offspring incest or did God create other humans for mating purposes to not have incest? I know incest is against the Jewish and Christian laws so I'm confused on how the population grew without incest right from the begining. Also same question regarding the great flood which wiped out the worlds population except for Noah and his family?????
F. Zit: I would especially love your take on this because you seem to be a very knowledgable person.
Thanks Creeg. I thought that was what it had to be but none of my friends would admit it. I know very little about religion. I don't own a bible. At what point did God say it was against the Jewish and Chirstian laws for incest to be a no-no?
Zit, you creationist took a big hit yesterday with the Texas state school board. Why were you not there to straighten them out.