Ranking trade partners for the Cardinals 3rd overall pick..... from Hayden Winks

Search

Nothing Can Stop What is Coming!!!
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
21,441
Tokens
The Arizona Cardinals roster is in very tough shape, but they have the draft value this year to fill some of their biggest team needs. That starts with 3rd overall in the 2023 NFL Draft, where they'll be trying to convince teams to trade ahead of the QB-needy Colts at 4th overall. It's uncertain if the teams drafting early have high grades on Anthony Richardson or Will Levis, both considered high ceiling but very low floor prospects. To break down the odds of the Cardinals finding a trade partner, I'm looking at: draft capital needed for trade, severity of team needs, QB contracts, quality of players remaining without a trade, and the levels of "win now" each team is at.





Ultimately, I rank the Cardinals' trade candidates as: Lions, Raiders, Colts, Seahawks, Falcons, Titans, and Texans. Here's why:

  • Lions: This would require 48th and 81st overall... Jared Goff is set to make $30M and $31M over the next two years but without many guarantees. They like him but are less attached to him compared to Geno and the Hawks, plus the Lions don't have a high-end backup or a 71-year-old coach. On top of that, very highly ranked EDGE1 Will Anderson is likely unavailable here. A trade is possible.
  • Raiders: This would require 38th and 70th overall... Jimmy Garoppolo is paid like a slightly below-average starter but did get $11M in guarantees for 2024. They also just signed backup/coach Brian Hoyer to re-unite with Josh McDaniels. With so many holes on this roster and familiarity in the QB room, the Raiders seem more focused on filling up the OL and DEF with starters. A trade is possible but somewhat unlikely, though some NFL insiders have hinted at this being more possible than I'm letting on.
  • Colts: This would require 35th overall or multiple 3rd round picks... That's not too unreasonable if the Colts have a major preference between Anthony Richardson or Will Levis and if they thought others would have that same preference. A trade is possible but somewhat unlikely.
  • Seahawks: This would require 37th overall... Geno Smith was paid like an above-average starter in 2023 and has partial guarantees in 2024. They love him, and even re-signed Drew Lock to a $4M contract. Pete Carroll might only be coaching for a couple more years and probably views a suddenly-worse NFC West as the perfect time to win now. A trade is possible but unlikely, especially with Will Anderson and/or Jalen Carter extremely likely dropping into their lap.
  • Falcons: This would require 44th overall, 75th overall, and more... 2022 3rd rounder Desmond Ridder played fine enough as a rookie to be in the starter mix, especially with Taylor Heinicke signing a two-year, $12M partially guaranteed contract to be the backup. Their offseason moves point towards a team trying to win now in a very bad NFC South. A trade is possible but unlikely.
  • Titans: This would require a future 1st... Tennessee only has six draft picks and a ton of holes on the OL, at WR, and on DEF. Does a first-year GM want to attach himself to that much draft capital to move up? A trade including 34-year-old Ryan Tannehill would save the Titans $18M, so bringing in a rookie QB would make sense if someone they like slides. A trade is possible but unlikely.
  • Texans: This would require 12th, 33rd, and 104th overall... After getting their franchise QB, what if the Texans view EDGE1 Will Anderson as Demeco Ryan's new Nick Bosa? This would be fun, and they have five top-73 overall picks to work with. A trade is possible but very unlikely.
For more, check out my most recent 2023 NFL Mock Draft.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Messages
684
Tokens
Every team this year in the top 4 should trade back.. The Bears made a smart move.

The Seahawks are in the best spot at 5 to get the best defensive player.

Why can't teams just say and admit ' this is a bad qb draft" and move on instead of forcing a pick.

Build a roster and when the time is right; strike to get the qb. This stuff isn't hard. Getting a great OT will not make your team great next year, but with that, when you get the qb, it will dramatically improve your team.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,382
Tokens
Steelers are trying to trade dropsy WR Deionte Johnson plus their 2nd round pick to Houston to move up to 12th thereby assuring they get one of the 3 OT they view as Pro Bowl caliber. They believe Pickens is a legit #1 WR

and if someone thinks this is a bad qb draft (it's not) then what was last year?
 

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Messages
684
Tokens
Steelers are trying to trade dropsy WR Deionte Johnson plus their 2nd round pick to Houston to move up to 12th thereby assuring they get one of the 3 OT they view as Pro Bowl caliber. They believe Pickens is a legit #1 WR

and if someone thinks this is a bad qb draft (it's not) then what was last year?
This is a bad qb draft... Every draft gives us great tackles, edge rushers, and receivers

There are 5-6 franchise qbs in the NFL and they play 16-20 years so that means you can easily go 2-3 drafts without a franchise qb since some will have 2.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,115,518
Messages
13,525,127
Members
100,277
Latest member
habitodesigns1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com