but if we give a bonus based on the "action" then we are giving bonuses on both wins and losses.
this this way we only pay on the net, whether it be wins (2%) or losses (5%)
lets say the player has 50k in winnings and 100k in losses, then he would get 2500 back (50k net losses) or vice versa - he would get 1000 based on 2% of his 50k net wins.
the other way i would have to pay him 1500 based on 150k in action win or lose.
which do you think is better for the book? TO be honest I really dont know. what is the guy had 200k in wins ans 200k in losses. then i would have to pay him 4k, and BHB hasnt made anything on him.
this this way we only pay on the net, whether it be wins (2%) or losses (5%)
lets say the player has 50k in winnings and 100k in losses, then he would get 2500 back (50k net losses) or vice versa - he would get 1000 based on 2% of his 50k net wins.
the other way i would have to pay him 1500 based on 150k in action win or lose.
which do you think is better for the book? TO be honest I really dont know. what is the guy had 200k in wins ans 200k in losses. then i would have to pay him 4k, and BHB hasnt made anything on him.