hey numbers....been followin you for a while but i just posted for the first time today....you have been great....wateva your system is keep doin it...its been workin very well....jumped on the dodgers n yanks tonite....we hada sweat that one out but the yanks look good so far even though they technically arent a play...anyway thanks for the plays and thanks for the $$$
Well MC, upon closer look, I think we're both wrong.
Let's revise my observation.
Fading unfiltered Fs on Thurs would have been 0-3 (Red Sox lose; Braves lose; Diamondbacks lose)
So the new observation is:
Fading Fs on a two game chase system would be 5-0.
Red Sox Fri; Braves Fri; Diamondbacks Fri; Blue Jays Fri; Rays Fri.
Like that better.
Let's revise my observation.
Fading unfiltered Fs on Thurs would have been 0-3 (Red Sox lose; Braves lose; Diamondbacks lose)
So the new observation is:
Fading Fs on a two game chase system would be 5-0.
Red Sox Fri; Braves Fri; Diamondbacks Fri; Blue Jays Fri; Rays Fri.
Like that better.
Nope. That's your department, professor. You may be onto something though as the "F" pulses aren't good enough to play so they may be decent fades. From what I know of it, I would say they would hit 50/50 but if they're dogs and small favs it might be a profitable grind. I do know that all the teams with the grades went 10-5 in the two days. That's only for the series openers though. How's the weather over yonder? Heard it's been shitty. You getting any golf in? How r u likin' the C's acquisition of 'Sheed? Reminds me a little of Moss joining the Pats. Boy, Celts-Cavs is gonna be even more of a war.
1-0 last night as we survived a crazy Dodgers game. See how these "barely qualified" games end up treating us? Don't look now, but filtered plays lined between 125-149 are 16-0.
With that win, we head into the all-star break at 33-8, including 23-2 on the filtered plays. I'm not sure yet how I'm going to approach that first weekend back from the break as it may be tough to get a pulse read on these teams Thursday and Friday.
Gotta get outa here. Lotsa stuff to get done before headin' to Maine.
Weather to date this summer awful. Still sleepin' with a blanket in mid July. Nuts.
Golf. Less. My little biz getting whacked by the economy. (May have to take this stuff more seriously. haha)
Sheed? Super. He's a hothead but don't like the Moss analogy. I never was in favor of the Moss aquisition. I think the Pats lost that SB because Brady kept holdin' the ball lookin' for Moss instead of using the quick release short game that had been their bread and butter for years. With the addition of Sheed (primarily for his board presence) and the return of Garnett and another year of maturity for Rondo I think we're gonna be better than ever. Watch out for San An.
Now for the real stuff.
16-0 -125 to -149. Holy crap. Beyond spectacular.
If you want I'll track the fade of the unfiltered Fs in a two game chase system for the second half. May be some promise there. Would like to see more volume outa your work. This (Bases) is the season to pile bankroll IMHO (many CURRENT statistical samplings and many more play opprtunities as a rule).
Keep up the spectacular work bud.
Weather to date this summer awful. Still sleepin' with a blanket in mid July. Nuts.
Golf. Less. My little biz getting whacked by the economy. (May have to take this stuff more seriously. haha)
Sheed? Super. He's a hothead but don't like the Moss analogy. I never was in favor of the Moss aquisition. I think the Pats lost that SB because Brady kept holdin' the ball lookin' for Moss instead of using the quick release short game that had been their bread and butter for years. With the addition of Sheed (primarily for his board presence) and the return of Garnett and another year of maturity for Rondo I think we're gonna be better than ever. Watch out for San An.
Now for the real stuff.
16-0 -125 to -149. Holy crap. Beyond spectacular.
If you want I'll track the fade of the unfiltered Fs in a two game chase system for the second half. May be some promise there. Would like to see more volume outa your work. This (Bases) is the season to pile bankroll IMHO (many CURRENT statistical samplings and many more play opprtunities as a rule).
Keep up the spectacular work bud.
Thanks JJ and DC.
Please do track that fade chase. I'd be interested in what you find. Since you mentioned baseball volume, I have to admit this pulse system is more voluminous (is that the right word?) than I show it to be. What I post here is actually a subset. I wanted to keep things simple, so I used a trimmed down version that was geared towards hitting the highest winning % possible. The overall pulse system was 115-44 (72%) coming into Saturday which includes these posted plays. There's several angles this thing can probably produce but, for now, I have a pace of close to 350 games at a near 20% R.O.I. That is, until you dig up a hidden gem to replace the weak links and I expect you'll find something.
Actually now that I think about it, didn't we talk about comparing notes on our baseball stuff? Jeez, we'd probably come up with something sick because we use the same basic concept (I think) except you find the dogs and I find the favs. Blend that together and......BOOM!!!...the world would end.
:lol:
Please do track that fade chase. I'd be interested in what you find. Since you mentioned baseball volume, I have to admit this pulse system is more voluminous (is that the right word?) than I show it to be. What I post here is actually a subset. I wanted to keep things simple, so I used a trimmed down version that was geared towards hitting the highest winning % possible. The overall pulse system was 115-44 (72%) coming into Saturday which includes these posted plays. There's several angles this thing can probably produce but, for now, I have a pace of close to 350 games at a near 20% R.O.I. That is, until you dig up a hidden gem to replace the weak links and I expect you'll find something.
Actually now that I think about it, didn't we talk about comparing notes on our baseball stuff? Jeez, we'd probably come up with something sick because we use the same basic concept (I think) except you find the dogs and I find the favs. Blend that together and......BOOM!!!...the world would end.
:lol:
well yes, a 20% ROI over that many games... if his system is nearly as good (and your enthousiasm implies such) that would make a system to make the bookies cry!
Actually, since all your other plays are apparently running that well as well, think I might just play your other plays for something small (say, 1/4th of a normal unit each).
Actually, since all your other plays are apparently running that well as well, think I might just play your other plays for something small (say, 1/4th of a normal unit each).
