Props to BHB for grading KC and under a winner!

Search

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2001
Messages
4,398
Tokens
I am not a big book supporter,but there is no way that wager would have been graded. You have more justification for a baseball game with and o/u of 10 and the score is 20-0 in the bottom of the 8th you have the over and the game is called because of rain.When is the last time some one paid you on that.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
807
Tokens
If true...this is a very reckless bookmaking move
icon_confused.gif
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,040
Tokens
Good morning to all. As I talked to a few of you (posters and bettors) yesterday I had mentioned that we were upgrading software. Unfortunately there was a computer generated glitch that caused the grading of last nights game to be a winner. We knew that the game should've been graded as a push for those who had the second half and full game. The people to have action on the game were the ones who had wagers on the first half. It took techs and managers until about midnight to hand-fix the situation and adjust the correct action.
We greatly apologize for ANY inconvenience you (the posters and bettors) had last night with the incorrect grading of the game.
Please call into customer service or our wagering department if you have any questions about how a game was graded.
Although, this type of situation should not happen again.
Again, BHB apologizes for any inconvenience.
Thank you and good luck.
Justin
-BHB
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
% chance the over would have hit in this game


2% from my calculations....


this game
icon_mad.gif
was the first thing i thought of when i woke up this morning....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
279
Tokens
.

[This message was edited by benstern on August 29, 2003 at 01:14 PM.]
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
Easily possible, lol...define the likeliness General?

watching that game and the feel of that game I`d say no more than 2% of the time that game goes over...I`m not complaining about any books decision as I knew immediately it would not count...

still pisses me off I can`t recall a rainout of any kind ever working for me, for that matter a pitching change either...

my career record in rainouts...

would have won games: 6
saved by rainout : 0

pitching change game would have won : 4
pitching change would have lost : 0

I can`t recall one time this has worked for me #@#$@#$^@#$^@

Last year I had the Twins very large for me...Twins scored 7 times in inning one, game got rained out...also had the Wisconsin game
icon_rolleyes.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
476
Tokens
Terms of bets are decided before the event. Those of you that think the score has any relevance, really need to think about it. It does not matter if KC was winning 500-0, ( I had KC too ;( ) if the rules decided before hand say it goes 55 minutes, thats the rules. If you think the score has anything to do with anything, than, you are trying to change the terms of your bet after the outcome is known...

Props to bhb for getting this straightened and handily it correctly...
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,040
Tokens
Again, we do apologize for the situation we had last night.
We do not accept buying points on the half's of games, only full games. We are checking to see if that was an option on last nights game, if there was there shouldn't have been.
Thank you for the heads up and good luck to all.
Justin
-BHB
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
877
Tokens
another fool pointing out is misgraded bet and getting it regraded
icon_smile.gif


But i think he is BHB's only player.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,572,991
Members
100,865
Latest member
dinnnadna
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com