Some people continue to amaze. At least from GoGo this is not about who won their bet and who did not. This is the NBA all over again though to what level not sure.
1. 13-1 penalties against Pitt. Pitt was the home team.
2. Phantom PI gave SD first and goal on their first TD>
3. There was no penalty flag on the play in question at the end of the game.
4. They reviewed the play even though there was really no reason to. Both teams were ready to get off the field.
5. The referee reviewed the play and said their was an illegal forward pass despite replays showing no CLEAR conclusive evidence. If the replay does not show clear evidence, which it did clearly not, why call the play dead?
6. NFL rules state even with the supposed forward pass as long as the ball does not hit the ground the play is still alive. So the play is not dead at the spot of foul. Again NFL rules.
7. The ref was in the booth for at least 5-7 minutes. It was much longer than a normal replay review. If the play had no effect on outcome of the game then why would someone be in the booth that long? Since it took that long why didn't someone up in the booth help advise him of the rule?
8. The ref admitted after the game that he got the ruling wrong.
9. The NFL says it has no effect on the outcome of the game yet total points is 7th in tiebreakers for playoff spot. So apparently its does have an affect on the game.
Cannot believe that anyone with a rational mind cannot look at this game with doubts about the legitamcy of some NFL games. This is ridiculous.
<TABLE class=tborder id=post6026446 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #fdde82 0px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #fdde82 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #fdde82 0px solid" width=175>
W2-G<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_6026446", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Junior
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12
</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_6026446 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #fdde82 1px solid"><!-- icon and title -->
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by
GoGoBird
BB, with all due respect that is BS. SD the right side...yeah OK. Yeah they played a great game. So in your eyes there was nothing unusual about how this game played out.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
GoGos point has much to do with the integrity or the perceived integrity in sports. Even if you remove gambling from the equation completely, I think we could all agree the point of Instant Replay is to insure the calls on the field/court are correct.
The replay system was designed to STOP the precise problem that it actually created today through its use in the SD/Pit game.
Given the access to replay...(since most replays see the same angles as TV coverage) there's no excuse for what happened.
And then to realize a mistake was made and still not make a change??
The effect is they blew the call TWICE (during the game and after it) WITH Instant Replay.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I completely agree with the two of you. The tools are there to make the correct decision, including the video review and they refuse too leave the TD on the scoreboard. Yes I only had the Steelers, 2nd half -3, so a Push, but nevertheless we were fcked by something that is not open to opinion, but blatant disregard for the NFL rules. This should have been a closed case TD!