I couldn't possibly disagree more. Just about every paragraph was about Oregon St. but mischaracterized with one shallow judgment after the next and little truth to it... maybe just enough to be dangerous. I hardly know where to begin taking it apart.
The post sounds like someone who hasn't followed a single article or blog about the Beavers and has quit reading after the annuals were printed aside from taking up stat sheets to cram an argument into a few sentences that make little sense. I can't answer to that.
I don't think this person has the vaguest idea of how this team's seasons have unfolded year after year because clearly there's nothing about how they start slow and finish strong... not to mention a major slide down in the quality of play by ASU that is CURRENTLY happening. And that's going to turn around for some unknown reason as they manage an upset... or just to make a case against the Beavers?
So nothing's changed except perception... you think?
ASU covers easily. Imagine that. Good old ND isn't as dumb as everyone seems to think.