What part of turn over all the records related to the election in the subpoena wasn’t clear enough ?
Biggs : Your Twitter account mentions that the purging of the 2020 election database in the beginning of February is a standard practice . Can you please confirm for me that you do that for all elections.
Neither Chairman or Vice Chair had an answer .
Chairman Sellers chimes in : Because of limited space on the servers when you have another election you have to make room for additional election data .
Biggs : If that is the standard practice can you explain to me why data was still present from prior elections.
We don’t have an answer for you on that either .We’ll get back to you on that as well .
Sounds perfectly clear , don’t it .
:bbsmile:
[h=1]TGP EXCLUSIVE – AZ Audit Volunteers Prevented from Attending DC Hearing on Their Audit Work – “I Knocked on Doors, I saw the Empty Lots with the 75 Names Attached to the One Address” (VIDEO)[/h]
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...le-enough-not-moving-forward-2022-2020-fixed/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...le-enough-not-moving-forward-2022-2020-fixed/
OMG you have become one of the biggest hack jobs in here.
Explanation - "The data requested in the subpoena was deleted and archived, and you didn't ask specifically for "archived" data, so we did not turn it over."
Wow, just fkn wow. Do you ever think maybe once that there was malfeasance....ah never mind.
Right.
We have subpoena and would like the deleted and archived, and then vaulted data.
"Sorry, we have moved it from the vault and put it into the cloud for storage and you didn't ask for cloud stored data."
And SD defending this, sees nothing wrong. Funny how it took court and being under oath to bring this shit to the surface.
Democrats - "They found nothing in Arizona"
Fkn total losers.
Next question
"Is this standard practice to delete files after an election?"
Answer
"From what I understand it is required to make room for more data for the next election."
Follow up
"Then why is there still data from prior elections on the machines?"
Answer
"Uhh...uhhhh...DuhFool....uh...Small Daddy...uhhh...Bozo...uh.....Dongshit....uhhhh...uhhhh...I'll have to get you an answer."
Unbelievable how arrogant and corrupt these shit bags are.
"Is this standard practice to delete files after an election?"
Answer
"From what I understand it is required to make room for more data for the next election."
Follow up
"Then why is there still data from prior elections on the machines?"
Answer
"Uhh...uhhhh...DuhFool....uh...Small Daddy...uhhh...Bozo...uh.....Dongshit....uhhhh...uhhhh...I'll have to get you an answer."
Unbelievable how arrogant and corrupt these shit bags are.
G dont make me drop the hammer on you.
My response to Mags was not about the subpoena.
I know nothing about the specifics about the subpoena.
As far as that goes...Its just Republicans doing republicany things. So Republicans not respecting subpoenas wouldnt shock me one bit.
Par for the course, really
SD has tortured logic all through this thread; apparently he's a sadist who wants
to torture it to death.
Perhaps we should refer to him as Grand Inquisitor.hno:
Comical . He went from saying the board members gave clear answers to questions under oath , which they didn’t to so what if they screwed up , they’re Republicans don’t blame Democrats .
