Stanford -5.5 2nd H
Stanford -11 2nd H +290
Stanford o36 2nd H
Stanford -3 3rd Q -115
Washington will regret not delivering the knockout blow in the 1st Q when they had the Cardinals on the rope. I wish a book would throw up a ML on who wins the game from here as I'd be all in on Stanford. I will be curious to see if Tara will have them attack the basket a bit more as any bit of foul trouble will destroy the Huskies who only go 6 deep.
Edit: They did throw up an alternate 2nd H line so adding it in.
Stanford -11 2nd H +290
Stanford o36 2nd H
Stanford -3 3rd Q -115
Washington will regret not delivering the knockout blow in the 1st Q when they had the Cardinals on the rope. I wish a book would throw up a ML on who wins the game from here as I'd be all in on Stanford. I will be curious to see if Tara will have them attack the basket a bit more as any bit of foul trouble will destroy the Huskies who only go 6 deep.
Edit: They did throw up an alternate 2nd H line so adding it in.
my book finally put up the line and now it's -30. missed the boat on that one.
syracuse press looked pretty good vs tennessee yesterday. It didn't help Tennessee starting PG was out but they cut it to 3 a couple times late and then I leave the room and come back down 10-12. Good luck tonight. I'll be on the late ones but don't think I can take UCONN at -30 when it opened -20.5
wtf are you talking about? he posted it on saturday and he was talking about the game line. if you aren't going to pay attention to women's hoops and just ride the picks, at least have an idea of what you are talking about. never once did he say he was playing 1h uconn -20.5. You can definitely make that known by the fact he said he would lay more than -30. I can guarantee you he wouldn't lay more than 30 in the first half especially when we were just on mississippi st +31.5 for the entire game vs uconn.
Actually I am on both. I made the play when the line opened on the game at -20.5 which I felt was stealing like I mentioned in my brief mention of the game. I also played them laying that same number in the 1st H as the line did jump over 10 points from the opener.
They did not put a 1st H & 1st Q number up until yesterday well after the game line had jumped significantly.
