nikeairx
Here ya go boss.
Friday......Minnesota
Saturday......Atlanta
Monday......Cincinnati
Comment:
I know that you shouldn't pick your spots if it's going good, but of the 5 plays using system 9, I consider Atlanta the weakest link. I'm involved with the other 4, but I'm struggling to pull the trigger on Atlanta. I was willing to go against NE with Baltimore and overcome NE's 8-1 ATS in week one of PS. Just not so sure I want to go against J'villes 7-1 ATS in week one of PS.
BOL,
Green Valley
Here ya go boss.
Friday......Minnesota
Saturday......Atlanta
Monday......Cincinnati
Comment:
I know that you shouldn't pick your spots if it's going good, but of the 5 plays using system 9, I consider Atlanta the weakest link. I'm involved with the other 4, but I'm struggling to pull the trigger on Atlanta. I was willing to go against NE with Baltimore and overcome NE's 8-1 ATS in week one of PS. Just not so sure I want to go against J'villes 7-1 ATS in week one of PS.
BOL,
Green Valley
nikeairx
When I decided to make plays on systems where you have 5 qualifiers, I break down the denomination into two groups. The first is what I feel the amount I should bet based on the systems recent success, and try to wager the same amount on all plays.
The other factor which would influence me into wagering just a little more on one or more of the plays is what number I can reach. For example:
I had access to Balt +6 and kicked it up a notch. As far as the confidence level for Minnesota tonight, it's about the same as the other 4 I played. I mean, I like them, but that's as far as it goes. I cannot afford to find any team I love. It just doesn't work that way for me anyway.
I just don't beleive in such a thing as a lock......just teams with the lowest possible risk percentage and the highest possible probablility factor prior to kickoff.
BOL,
Green Valley
When I decided to make plays on systems where you have 5 qualifiers, I break down the denomination into two groups. The first is what I feel the amount I should bet based on the systems recent success, and try to wager the same amount on all plays.
The other factor which would influence me into wagering just a little more on one or more of the plays is what number I can reach. For example:
I had access to Balt +6 and kicked it up a notch. As far as the confidence level for Minnesota tonight, it's about the same as the other 4 I played. I mean, I like them, but that's as far as it goes. I cannot afford to find any team I love. It just doesn't work that way for me anyway.
I just don't beleive in such a thing as a lock......just teams with the lowest possible risk percentage and the highest possible probablility factor prior to kickoff.
BOL,
Green Valley
nikeairx
I see Buffalo +3.5 in a majority of places with 4's still available at a few others.
I played at +6, but that was early in the week. Having to take a lessor number, if need be, would significantly reduce the amount wagered for me.
Comment:
The systems plays that qualify do not have a corresponding pointspread attached to them for a reason.
It’s each individual bettor’s responsibility to secure for themselves the best line at which to make their wager on. For example: With all the outlets at their fingertips, no one should have to lay - 7.5 on a game when - 6.5 and - 7 are available at another location.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
fficeffice" /><o
>Line movement, as a result of injuries, weather and public opinion are a significant part of wagering on sports. The astute gambler knows this and spends a good portion of his time shopping for the best number that offers him a greater chance of winning his bet.<o></o>
</o>
GV
I see Buffalo +3.5 in a majority of places with 4's still available at a few others.
I played at +6, but that was early in the week. Having to take a lessor number, if need be, would significantly reduce the amount wagered for me.
Comment:
The systems plays that qualify do not have a corresponding pointspread attached to them for a reason.
It’s each individual bettor’s responsibility to secure for themselves the best line at which to make their wager on. For example: With all the outlets at their fingertips, no one should have to lay - 7.5 on a game when - 6.5 and - 7 are available at another location.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
fficeffice" /><o>Line movement, as a result of injuries, weather and public opinion are a significant part of wagering on sports. The astute gambler knows this and spends a good portion of his time shopping for the best number that offers him a greater chance of winning his bet.<o></o></o
>GV
