NFL for the week of 9/14

ATX · Sep 9, 2003

INDI under 44.5 for 1%

ATX · Sep 10, 2003

INDI -2 or better. not sure how big.

nepenthe · Sep 10, 2003

ATX, I've been here a relatively short time but have come to learn and respect your knowledge of the sportsbetting market. A few of your extended treatises on your background etc. combined with your long-term performance were enough to convince me. I hope you continue to hone your skills and prosper as few can. And Kodiak, thanks for your presence as well and providing us with entertainment.

ATX · Sep 12, 2003

BAL/CLE under 40.5 for 1.5%

ATX · Sep 12, 2003

I am almost certainly going to take AZ and JAX, good idea to wait on possible movement.

ATX · Sep 12, 2003

AZ +4.5 or better for 1%

ATX · Sep 12, 2003

JAX +3 (if you can get this) for 1%

ATX · Sep 12, 2003

KC -3 -115 for 1%

PATS +5 or better for 1%

BEARS under 45 for .6%

chick'sfridge · Sep 13, 2003

ATX:
Keep up the great work. Your results speak volumnes! Your insight is appreciated by most, who frequent this site. Your money management concepts rank among the best.

ATX · Sep 14, 2003

thanks, fridge

you are the type of person that I'm talking to.

BUFF +3 or better for 1%

INDI -2 for 1%

nepenthe · Sep 14, 2003

Morning, ATX.
Buffalo +3...didn't you mean Jax?

ATX · Sep 14, 2003

I have JAX +3, not Buffalo.

Sorry for the confusion, I have to wade thru Kodiak's garbage to make sure I have posted what I am wagering on, and it's taking too much effort.

AZ ML +171 for .3%

JAX ML +141 for .3%

NE ML +172 for .4%

TheGeneral+ · Sep 14, 2003

There is a copy in the RR for more of Kodiak sillyness.

Good luck ATX.

BigGamesOnly · Sep 14, 2003

Thanks General.

ATX · Sep 14, 2003

OAK -11 for .6%

ATX · Sep 14, 2003

I also had GB -6.5 for 1%

and MIN -8 for 1%

I am almost positive that I posted these.

Mods or anyone else, can you verify this?

I dont want to count these plays if they were not posted, thier may be some other ones but these two I am almost positive I posted a while back.

nepenthe · Sep 14, 2003

Yes ATX, I do remember you posting these.

Kodiak7 · Sep 14, 2003

newsflash to ATX..

nobody cares.. HOW does 2 plays that are over effect anything for the people in here? If you played them then great,for you got one win for sure in your account. And that is all that matters...

strange bean we got here????

here is your post with these two plays and another.. funny how you forgot buffalo under BUT not gb!

BUFFALO under 43 for 1.5%

adding .5% to iNDI under for a total of 1.5%

GB -6.5 for 1%

MIN -8 for 1%

[This message was edited by Kodiak7 on September 14, 2003 at 09:04 PM.]

Kodiak7 · Sep 14, 2003

PS the final score of that BUFFALO game you forgot to ask the mods about was 38-17.. GOOD LUCK with Minny!

ATX · Sep 14, 2003

Kodiak,

YOU ARE THE REASON THAT I AM HAVING PROBLEMS TRACKING MY OWN POSTED PLAYS.

the mods have to come in here and edit out your nursery rhymes, they didnt have time to make sure that all of my plays remained intact as they edited out many, many posts.

everyone has plays that they dont have time to post, or forget to post, it doesnt matter.

I am only interested in making sure my POSTED record is 100% accurate.

unposted plays dont matter and dont affect anyone, I dont mention them.

I usually update all of my posted records by monday or tuesday, and I had the under with Buffalo.

Try to find something useful to do with your time, I'm sure there are plenty of people pissed off with having to babysit you and edit your posts, and TRK quit tracking NCAA football b/c of your ridiculous 10,10.5,11 75/100/150 type wagers.

Werent you just banned for this same thing? Your entertainment value is diminishing.