NFL coronavirus testing debacle renders 77 false positives

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,008
Tokens
The NFL had 77 positive COVID-19 tests from 11 teams re-examined by a New Jersey lab after false positives, and all those tests came back negative.

The league asked the New Jersey lab BioReference to investigate the results, and those 77 tests are being re-tested once more to make sure they were false positives.

Among teams reporting false positives, the Minnesota Vikings said they had 12, the New York Jets 10 and the Chicago Bears nine.

The Jets canceled a walk-through Saturday night but had a full practice Sunday morning after the previously positive tests came back negative. The Bears moved their practice scheduled for Sunday morning to the afternoon.

The Detroit Lions had a player with a false positive test from the same lab in New Jersey and he was held out of practice Sunday, a league source told The Associated Press. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the league and team were not disclosing test results.

The Pittsburgh Steelers said they had six false positives and those players will be back at practice Monday. The Philadelphia Eagles held out four players from working out Sunday. The Cleveland Browns initially canceled practice, but after re-testing turned up negative tests they decided to have their workout.

There are five labs nationwide that service the 32 teams, with only the New Jersey facility having the false positives this weekend.

The number of positive COVID-19 tests from a specific facility that might actually be false demonstrates the precarious position the NFL is in less than three weeks from the regular-season opener.

“Definitely probably better that this happened now than three weeks from now,” said Buffalo Bills general manager Brandon Beane, whose club had some of those positive results. “But it seems like every few weeks, or even every week, something’s going on. Who know what the next curveball will be?”

Beane said tests in the Northeast had gone “haywire,” and called it “a lab issue and not a true issue with our guys currently” after several Bills were held out of practice.

Anyone testing positive for COVID-19 — even a false positive upon a retest — is required to have two more negative tests before being cleared to return.

The NFL uses BioReference for all of its COVID-19 testing, though tests are handled by labs throughout the nation to ensure teams get results quickly — hopefully within 24 hours. Heading into this weekend, there had been four confirmed positive tests for players who were at training camps.

“Clubs are taking immediate precautionary measures as outlined in the NFL-NFLPA’s health and safety protocols to include contact tracing, isolation of individuals and temporarily adjusting the schedule, where appropriate,” the NFL said in a statement. “The other laboratories used for NFL testing have not had similar results.”

Jets offensive lineman Leo Koloamatangi, who opted out of playing this season because of family health concerns, tweeted: “Wishing nothing but safety and great health over my brothers and their families right now. As it turns out, testing isn’t as reliable as we’d all hoped.”

The Bears were alerted Sunday morning about the test findings.

“That’s where I was really excited for the way we went about communicating with the coordinators, the coaches, the players early, just letting them know, ‘Hold on for the now. We’re gonna delay this thing. Let us work through this a little bit,’” Bears coach Matt Nagy said.

“And then we were able to get those players and everybody involved in the positive test, we were able to get them in and obviously get re-tested and come back with the second test, and it came back all negative. So now we had to go to, ‘Now, what do we do?’ That’s when we went ahead and figured we were able to move forward with practice. We delayed it.”

Beane stressed the need for transparency throughout the Bills’ organization and said some players were on a conference call with the NFL’s chief medical officer, Dr. Allen Sills.

“We had an open dialogue with our players,” he explained. “We even had some of our leadership crew of players on with Dr. Sills this morning just hearing directly with him, who’s aware of all these tests that have gone a little bit haywire here in the Northeast.

“And I think that was good for them to hear, because naturally, if you’re going to be out there tackling and blocking and things like that, passing the ball around, people might be unnerved if we got some guys missing.”

The Browns said initial results from the lab indicated multiple “presumptive positive cases” that included coaches, players and staff. The team did not disclose the number of positive tests and had resumed the scheduled practice about four hours after calling it off.

The team also did a thorough cleaning of the facility in Berea, Ohio.

“We’ve concluded our re-testing of each initial presumptive positive result from yesterday among players, coaches and staff,” a team spokesperson said.

“All have come back as negative, which is consistent with the irregularities across the league from multiple teams. As a result, we are reopening our building and will resume football activities this afternoon. As per protocol, the individuals with test results in question may not re-enter the building until they receive another negative test result tomorrow.”



https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost...ting-debacle-rendered-77-false-positives/amp/
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,008
Tokens
And the best goes on.....if this is what's going on in the NFL, there must be thousands, & hundreds of thousands false positives across America.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,169
Tokens
This has to be fake news, did you run this by X-Hole?

He knows the truth about this stuff
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
And the best goes on.....if this is what's going on in the NFL, there must be thousands, & hundreds of thousands false positives across America.

How many false negatives:

"Jun 10, 2020 - The main type of test for the novel coronavirus around the world has a “false-<wbr style="color: rgb(77, 81, 86); font-family: arial, sans-serif;">negative” rate of at least 20 per cent, researchers from Johns Hopkins University found..."

https://www.google.com/search?q=fal...rome..69i57.9611j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8



 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
<header class="lx-stream-post__header gs-o-media gs-u-mb-alt" data-reactid=".egnlheg5i6.2.0.0.1.0.$lx-commentary.$lx-commentary.2.0.1.1.1:$post-5f49111bcd93e006716a76aa.0.1" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(30, 30, 30); font-family: Helvetica, Arial, freesans, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; margin-bottom: 12px !important;">[h=3]US deaths could exceed 200,000 by mid-September[/h]
</header>The coronavirus death toll in the US could rise above 200,000 by the middle of September, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has predicted.

The CDC on Thursday released its forecast<svg viewBox="0 0 32 32">
</path></svg>
for national deaths related to Covid-19 for the next four weeks.</p>An estimated 4,000 to 8,300 new deaths are expected to be recorded during the week ending 19 September, the CDC said.
The CDC’s worst-case scenario would see 207,000 deaths in total reported by that date.

At least 180,000 people have died with Covid-19 so far in the US, the highest number in the world, according to a tally by Johns Hopkins University<svg viewBox="0 0 32 32">
</path></svg>
.</p>The US of course has a large population. At 55.27, the US’s death rate per 100,000 people is the 11th highest in the world, the university’s analysis shows.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-53943522



 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,008
Tokens
<header class="lx-stream-post__header gs-o-media gs-u-mb-alt" data-reactid=".egnlheg5i6.2.0.0.1.0.$lx-commentary.$lx-commentary.2.0.1.1.1:$post-5f49111bcd93e006716a76aa.0.1" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(30, 30, 30); font-family: Helvetica, Arial, freesans, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; margin-bottom: 12px !important;">[h=3]US deaths could exceed 200,000 by mid-September[/h]
</header>The coronavirus death toll in the US could rise above 200,000 by the middle of September, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has predicted.

The CDC on Thursday released its forecast<svg viewBox="0 0 32 32">
</path></svg>
for national deaths related to Covid-19 for the next four weeks.</p>An estimated 4,000 to 8,300 new deaths are expected to be recorded during the week ending 19 September, the CDC said.
The CDC’s worst-case scenario would see 207,000 deaths in total reported by that date.

At least 180,000 people have died with Covid-19 so far in the US, the highest number in the world, according to a tally by Johns Hopkins University<svg viewBox="0 0 32 32">
</path></svg>
.</p>The US of course has a large population. At 55.27, the US’s death rate per 100,000 people is the 11th highest in the world, the university’s analysis shows.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-53943522




What happened to the 2.5 million deaths that were predicted?
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
What happened to the 2.5 million deaths that were predicted?

There were dozens of different predictions around the world by different experts.

Better to overestimate than underestimate.

Better to have people acting cautiously & carefully than irresponsibly.

Hence the advantage in saving lives by overestimating rather than underestimating.

So any overestimates may have worked out for the betterment of mankind.

"this is the process intelligent people follow."

"When there is new information, or the understanding of a situation evolves, intelligent people modify their opinions and advice. AKA "change their minds".

"Others who are threatened by their own fear and insecurity that they may be wrong, doggedly stick to their original position and find excuses to justify their inability to learn from new information."
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7
USA
178,998
TOTAL DEATHS
CDC | Updated: Aug 27 2020 12:16PM

 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
2,337
Tokens
The NFL had 77 positive COVID-19 tests from 11 teams re-examined by a New Jersey lab after false positives, and all those tests came back negative.

Despite the retests coming back negative, the CDC will *still* count those 77 positives.
 

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,918
Tokens
Better to overestimate than underestimate.

Better to have people acting cautiously & carefully than irresponsibly.

False
You conveniently leave out the FACT that the over-estimates have a cost too.
When the over-estimates cripple the economy that has a ripple effect on both quality of life and future death from other causes.
Stop ignoring that piece. It is a balancing act.
LOCKDOWNS AREN'T WITHOUT THEIR RISKS AND COSTS TOO

By your logic every time there is a flu season we should say "100 million could die", and lock down everything thereby ruining millions of lives.
Better safe than sorry, right?
Dumbass
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
False
You conveniently leave out the FACT that the over-estimates have a cost too.
When the over-estimates cripple the economy that has a ripple effect on both quality of life and future death from other causes.
Stop ignoring that piece. It is a balancing act.
LOCKDOWNS AREN'T WITHOUT THEIR RISKS AND COSTS TOO

Leave out? Nonsense. That has been addressed in multiple threads, such as, for example, this recent discussion which is presently near the top of page 1 of this forum:

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1164331

Try to keep up & not be obviously misinformed.

By your logic every time there is a flu season we should say "100 million could die", and lock down everything thereby ruining millions of lives.
Better safe than sorry, right?
Dumbass

No, that's based on your illogical reasoning, not based on any logic i have stated, let alone health experts' opinions. What health expert ever said 100 million could die in the US in one flu season so we should lockdown?
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
105,217
Tokens
False
You conveniently leave out the FACT that the over-estimates have a cost too.
When the over-estimates cripple the economy that has a ripple effect on both quality of life and future death from other causes.
Stop ignoring that piece. It is a balancing act.
LOCKDOWNS AREN'T WITHOUT THEIR RISKS AND COSTS TOO

By your logic every time there is a flu season we should say "100 million could die", and lock down everything thereby ruining millions of lives.
Better safe than sorry, right?
Dumbass
Lol. All true facts are left out when Xgaf posts
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,364
Messages
13,580,865
Members
100,973
Latest member
blaetech
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com