NFL approves plan for possible neutral-site AFC title game.

Search

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
89,528
Tokens
NFL owners have approved a plan that leaves open the possibility of a neutral-site AFC Championship Game and could determine home-field advantage for a wild-card game between the Cincinnati Bengals and Baltimore Ravens by a coin flip.
In the wake of the cancellation of Monday's Bills-Bengals game, the following scenarios based on Week 18 results were approved for holding the title game at a neutral site:
• If Buffalo (12-3) and Kansas City (13-3) both win or tie, a Bills-Chiefs championship game would be at a neutral site.

• If Buffalo and Kansas City both lose and Baltimore wins or ties, a Bills-Chiefs championship game would be at a neutral site.

• If Buffalo and Kansas City both lose and Cincinnati (11-4) wins, a Bills or Bengals vs. Chiefs championship game would be at a neutral site.

If the Ravens win Sunday over the Bengals and are matched against Cincinnati in an AFC wild-card game, the site would be determined by a coin flip. If Cincinnati wins or if the two teams are not matched against each other after a potential Ravens win, regular scheduling procedures would be used.
A three-fourths majority (24 of 32) of the owners was needed Friday to approve the changes, which the NFL said in a resolution would be in place for the 2022 season only.
The potential neutral sites have not been determined. The seeds will hold up throughout the playoffs. If Buffalo and Kansas City both win this weekend, the Chiefs will get the bye to the divisional round. If Buffalo wins and Kansas City loses, the Bills will be the No. 1 seed and get the bye, in which case no neutral sites would come into play.
The planned changes were made Friday over the apparent objection of the Bengals, with coach Zac Taylor saying his team felt it was at a disadvantage by the proposal.
"It's important for the team to know that, because somebody's got to fight for you. It's clearly not coming from the league," Taylor said Friday. "It's nice to have our ownership and front office support the players like they have. That is important for us."
Monday's game between Buffalo and Cincinnati was suspended with less than six minutes left in the first quarter and the Bengals leading 7-3 when Bills safety Damar Hamlin went into cardiac arrest after making a tackle. His heartbeat was restored on the field before he was transported to the University of Cincinnati Medical Center.
In announcing the decision to cancel the game Thursday, the NFL cited three key factors: The outcome would have no bearing on which teams qualified for the postseason; playing the game would have altered the playoff schedule for the remaining teams; and not playing the game would allow all clubs to know the postseason possibilities before the start of Week 18.
Bengals executive vice president Katie Blackburn is on the competition committee, which approved the scenarios Thursday. In a memo obtained by ESPN's Seth Wickersham, Blackburn urged teams to vote against the scenarios. Her reasoning stemmed from the timing of a rule change in this scenario away from the standard of winning percentages.
"The proper process for making rule change is in the off-season," Blackburn wrote. "It is not appropriate to put teams in a position to vote for something that may introduce bias, favor one team over another or impact their own situation when the vote takes place immediately before the playoffs."
Taylor also repeatedly emphasized Friday the need to follow current rules.
There's several instances this season when the club is fined or people in our building are fined and told to follow the rules, it's black and white, it's in the rulebook," Taylor said. "So now when we point out the rules and you're told, 'We're going to change that,' that seems... I don't want to hear about fair and equitable when that's the case."
NFL commissioner Roger Goodell had acknowledged in a statement Thursday that he recognized "there is no perfect solution."
"As we considered the football schedule, our principles have been to limit disruption across the league and minimize competitive inequities," he said.
The Chiefs abstained from voting on the proposed AFC playoff changes, a source told ESPN's Jeremy Fowler, with the thinking that teams directly impacted by the changes should not vote due to bias.
The Bills announced Friday that Hamlin had been taken off a breathing tube and had begun talking with his care team, family and teammates.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
86,896
Tokens
The real reason Roger Goodell became a contortionist and changed all the rules on the fly?

He doesn't want the Bills to lay down for the Patriots :)

If KC wins Saturday, the one seed would be off the table

In all seriousness, what a clown show. There are rules on the books, woke Roger didn't like them
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,732
Tokens
NFL taught Bengals a lesson

Instead of doing the right thing, force the team with the player fighting for his life to forfeit the game
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,732
Tokens
Pretty good compromise all around
Don't see reason why Ravens should have chance to host playoff game

Also seems unfair that Bengals/Bills Divisional match-up would be in Buffalo with the other neutral site scenarios in place
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
86,896
Tokens

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,549
Tokens
Bills lost a good chance at a bye week

Chiefs lose homefield even if they’re 1 seed

everyone kinda got screwed a little why futures didn’t really change a ton
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,549
Tokens
Follow the rules, super easy, no need to rewrite them

What are the rules? Just games cancelled and that’s the standings? If you do that it’s very advantageous to Chiefs

Sometimes best deals are where no one gets over too much

I do think they like the neutral site idea for business reasons though, maybe a trial run and that will be the future of conference championships. Everything for a dollar
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,732
Tokens
Bills lost a good chance at a bye week

Ravens lost a chance at winning division

Chiefs lose homefield even if they’re 1 seed

everyone kinda got screwed a little why futures didn’t really change a ton
What's the benefit of winning the division if you aren't guaranteed a home playoff game? Hats and shirts?

Bengals still have to play a first place schedule next year, worse draft pick, etc.

The Ravens didn't control their destiny to win the division. They would have only had a chance if the Bengals lost to the Bills, which didn't happen.

The Bengals got robbed of a home game that if they had won would have given them control of the 2 seed, with a shot at the 1. So losing that control should at least give them the same treatment as the other teams who lost control as well IMO ; that would be neutral Bills/Bengals match up
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
29,020
Tokens
Don't see reason why Ravens should have chance to host playoff game

Also seems unfair that Bengals/Bills Divisional match-up would be in Buffalo with the other neutral site scenarios in place
Can't the Bengals still get homefield and a 2 seed ?
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
86,896
Tokens
What are the rules? Just games cancelled and that’s the standings? If you do that it’s very advantageous to Chiefs

Sometimes best deals are where no one gets over too much

I do think they like the neutral site idea for business reasons though, maybe a trial run and that will be the future of conference championships. Everything for a dollar

The standings and seedings are based on games played. If the Chiefs benefit, so be it

There's a whole section in the rulebook that addresses uneven schedules. Roger decided to ignore it
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,549
Tokens
What's the benefit of winning the division if you aren't guaranteed a home playoff game? Hats and shirts?

Bengals still have to play a first place schedule next year, worse draft pick, etc.

The Ravens didn't control their destiny to win the division. They would have only had a chance if the Bengals lost to the Bills, which didn't happen.

The Bengals got robbed of a home game that if they had won would have given them control of the 2 seed, with a shot at the 1. So losing that control should at least give them the same treatment as the other teams who lost control as well IMO ; that would be neutral Bills/Bengals match up

The bills were having a better season before that game though, they lost 1 less game.

Agree on ravens and this isn’t the best argument but who is their QB Sunday? Anthony brown? If bengals can’t win that shit then I doubt anyone gonna feel like they got screwed out of anything. They’re like -10
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,732
Tokens
Can't the Bengals still get homefield and a 2 seed ?
They can, but they have already technically clinched the division which should guarantee them a home playoff game.

They would have controlled their destiny to get the 2 seed if they beat the Bills.

So if Bills lost control of ability to 1 and a neutral game is used to offset that, then the treatments should be used for Bengals/Bills since Bengals lost control of the 2

IMO

Personally I think they should have just based seedings off of winning percentages and not introduced the neutral site scenarios at all
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,732
Tokens
The bills were having a better season before that game though, they lost 1 less game.

Agree on ravens and this isn’t the best argument but who is their QB Sunday? Anthony brown? If bengals can’t win that shit then I doubt anyone gonna feel like they got screwed out of anything. They’re like -10
The Bills having a 12-3 record makes at least that part of the resolution rational, though Bengals were robbed of home game that would have given them opportunity to pass Bills. So I do think it's still unfair, though you can justify it since they will have played same amount of games I guess

And yeah I'm confident we win the game. It feels like the Ravens don't even want to be in the playoffs. That all said, the fact that we could possibly go to Baltimore is laughable
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,549
Tokens
The standings and seedings are based on games played. If the Chiefs benefit, so be it

There's a whole section in the rulebook that addresses uneven schedules. Roger decided to ignore it
The standings and seedings are based on games played. If the Chiefs benefit, so be it

There's a whole section in the rulebook that addresses uneven schedules. Roger decided to ignore it

They probably didn’t wanna penalize a team that almost had a guy die on the field too badly, kinda unprecedented.

So they just go standings down the line..,,chiefs 1 bills 2 bengals 3

If any of those teams lose this week they likely fall, not much different than your scenario. Just the neutral site thing, which I think they just see as an equalizer for bills/bengals losing bye equity to chiefs

I dunno, nothing would be perfect. Seems OK
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,549
Tokens
Does seem like the neutral site thing could take off though

Seems like that would be a massive money bonanza, similar to CFB conf title games. I think it’s a horrible idea and hate cfb system in general but it would make money
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,732
Tokens
Does seem like the neutral site thing could take off though

Seems like that would be a massive money bonanza, similar to CFB conf title games. I think it’s a horrible idea and hate cfb system in general but it would make money
Sure hope not. Home field is a beautiful element of the NFL system

Will be nice to see it integrated into CFB with expanded playoff
 

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2021
Messages
522
Tokens
What are the rules? Just games cancelled and that’s the standings? If you do that it’s very advantageous to Chiefs

Sometimes best deals are where no one gets over too much

I do think they like the neutral site idea for business reasons though, maybe a trial run and that will be the future of conference championships. Everything for a dollar
Of course neutral site in the NFL is the Meadowlands. They fucked over NO after Katrina told them moving their home game to NJ even though there were 5 large stadiums within 200 miles of NO. NFL is one shady billionaires boys club.
 

my clock is stuck on 420 time to hit this bong
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,425
Tokens
Of course neutral site in the NFL is the Meadowlands. They fucked over NO after Katrina told them moving their home game to NJ even though there were 5 large stadiums within 200 miles of NO. NFL is one shady billionaires boys club.
Be nice to see it in lambeau
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,735
Messages
13,558,985
Members
100,679
Latest member
win77vncom
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com