<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by wilheim:
Quickly - regarding myself and OF. I have never called him a liar or any other names. I have simply pointed out his claims are often after the fact, which I personally find wrong. Example in this thread
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> posted June 02, 2004 11:16 PM
Pedro not nearly dominant as old self. Just had a 15 pitch ab. Gives up 2 runs early quite often. Halos +1.51 and Halos + 1 1/2-.10. Already popped total on Yanx...OF
I jumped off Bosox +1.50 interactive...
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Post came right after Angels took 4-2 lead in bottom of third.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> posted June 02, 2004 11:35 PM
Washburn looked washed up, he was lucky to get through lineup, once. second time around, hit, hit, hit, hit. 0 K's, 3 bb's, wp, recorded 10 outs, 9 hits, 7 runs. Not even Pedro stinkin it up is that bad. I got that +1.50, with 2 runners on, no outs...OF
Timing is everything...
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Posted right after Red Sox have 5 run 4th. (btw. Sox nerver had two on with no outs in game.)
http://cbs.sportsline.com/mlb/gamecenter/playbyplay/MLB_20040602_BOS@ANA
Bottom line to all of this stuff:
I personally could care less about what OF wins or losses, I am only interested accurate _PREGAME_ predictions. Anyone who wants to brag about winning after the fact is free to do so, just don't be shocked that posters call him on it. As far as the name-calling goes, I won't stoop to that kind of juvinile posting.
Thanks, wil.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Post came right after I bet it, interactive like I said. Halo's up 4-2, how else would I get +1.50 on Bosox? When they went up the next inning? Thank You for validating that bet...
Your other misinformation propaganda, it says batters second time around. Which by your thread, started in the 3rd. I got off top of 4th, with 2 on 1 out, got that wrong. Glad you were there to catch that. Then I added why I got off. I mean, why do you think I jumped at locking in?
All you have illustrated is you are locked onto me, and any post I make you attack, there are many examples. How deep did you have to look to find out there was never a situation with 2 on and none out? Do you do that to every post, or just mine.
You have done your best to attack my character through your implications, like I really have not done what I post. Wil, who are you supposed to be watchdogging? The offshores or the forum members. Do you enjoy your implying your fellow members are liars? Then what is worse, other members follow your negative lead. Half this crap I go through is from you posting. Find someone else to shadow. For some unknown reason you have a chip on shoulder towards me, it is so obvious. I would appreciate it never got near one of my posts again, you are underdesirable, and a karma killer...What is your unofficial position here at the RX? OF
Quickly - regarding myself and OF. I have never called him a liar or any other names. I have simply pointed out his claims are often after the fact, which I personally find wrong. Example in this thread
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> posted June 02, 2004 11:16 PM
Pedro not nearly dominant as old self. Just had a 15 pitch ab. Gives up 2 runs early quite often. Halos +1.51 and Halos + 1 1/2-.10. Already popped total on Yanx...OF
I jumped off Bosox +1.50 interactive...
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Post came right after Angels took 4-2 lead in bottom of third.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> posted June 02, 2004 11:35 PM
Washburn looked washed up, he was lucky to get through lineup, once. second time around, hit, hit, hit, hit. 0 K's, 3 bb's, wp, recorded 10 outs, 9 hits, 7 runs. Not even Pedro stinkin it up is that bad. I got that +1.50, with 2 runners on, no outs...OF
Timing is everything...
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Posted right after Red Sox have 5 run 4th. (btw. Sox nerver had two on with no outs in game.)
http://cbs.sportsline.com/mlb/gamecenter/playbyplay/MLB_20040602_BOS@ANA
Bottom line to all of this stuff:
I personally could care less about what OF wins or losses, I am only interested accurate _PREGAME_ predictions. Anyone who wants to brag about winning after the fact is free to do so, just don't be shocked that posters call him on it. As far as the name-calling goes, I won't stoop to that kind of juvinile posting.
Thanks, wil.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Post came right after I bet it, interactive like I said. Halo's up 4-2, how else would I get +1.50 on Bosox? When they went up the next inning? Thank You for validating that bet...
Your other misinformation propaganda, it says batters second time around. Which by your thread, started in the 3rd. I got off top of 4th, with 2 on 1 out, got that wrong. Glad you were there to catch that. Then I added why I got off. I mean, why do you think I jumped at locking in?
All you have illustrated is you are locked onto me, and any post I make you attack, there are many examples. How deep did you have to look to find out there was never a situation with 2 on and none out? Do you do that to every post, or just mine.
You have done your best to attack my character through your implications, like I really have not done what I post. Wil, who are you supposed to be watchdogging? The offshores or the forum members. Do you enjoy your implying your fellow members are liars? Then what is worse, other members follow your negative lead. Half this crap I go through is from you posting. Find someone else to shadow. For some unknown reason you have a chip on shoulder towards me, it is so obvious. I would appreciate it never got near one of my posts again, you are underdesirable, and a karma killer...What is your unofficial position here at the RX? OF
OF - don't flatter yourself, I am far from locked onto you. Once again I will say it, if you are going to brag about winners after they are leading or have already won expect to be called on it. As far as implications go only you really know how much you lie. I have never once called you a liar or any other name, unlike your self who seems to like to resort to such adjectives as toolheim (cracks me up). You want to be left alone, fine - do the right thing, and give up the look at me I had the Yanks over tonight bullshit.
wil.
wil.
Only bullshit comes from you. You are the only one doing it. What is the point, I cannot say I had a play after the game starts? Is this an official monitoring site, or are you the unofficial monitor. Maybe you are so important to be the official self appointed monitor. Conversation was between me and Sick, who invited you. Second conversation was between me and Kiss1, who invited you. Why is someone so insignificent as you even bothering we something so trivial. If I can only post according to your guidelines, I give up. What is your puny position anyway RX toolheim? ...OF
Can we please have a mod to help wil see the light or is he blessed?
Can we please have a mod to help wil see the light or is he blessed?
I will spell it out for maybe the 10th. time. Post any thing you want, any time you want. Simply put don't get all bent out of shape if someone calls bullshit. It is not about guidelines, simply about right and wrong. This is a forum lest you forget, not a private chat between yourself and Kiss1, or Sick Gambler, no one gets invited or uninvited. Now try and use a bit of originality, I mean whats with toolheim? Grammar school word you picked up yesterday most likely. Please don't go crying wilheim is picking on me, he says I'm a liar, I just can't proove it.
wil.
wil.
