You're anti-Semitic, and too stupid to even know it. You're a universally despised internet troll who hates his own guts, and who just got caught ghosting. Why would anyone be surprised you can't relate Naziism and Palestinian terrorists? And why do I care to convince a moron? What difference does it make?
This is what you will never comprehend. Most of us are here because we enjoy it. You try to take that away from everyone. All I do is laugh at you. What goes on outside of here is life and death. For you that, and this is the same. I'm not stupid to think it matters in the big picture or in real life what gets posted here. OTOH you are so dumb you think you can ask your fellow posters questions and tell them to fuck their mother in the same sentence, and then expect them to give you their time. You are beyond all reach. You probably think I'm actually speaking to you right now when all I'm actually doing is entertaining myself and the rest here who only mock you. Keep responding though.
Ahhh, you mean as opposed to the high class entertainment YOU bring to the table, calling people animals, post pictures that don't have anything to do with the subject, and acting like you're some kind of big detective(and breaking forum rules in the when you haven't a fucking clue. No, I'll just keep posting things, which you claim on the one hand, you want to studiously want to avoid, but, you can't HELP yourself, so you need to be "entertained." Well, feast your eyes on the following, fresh off the presses, then "old school" insanity from that scum Yahoo. He is a delusional, lying cocksucker, who happens to be a Jew, and so are you. Btw, is the Jersusalem Post(and the Jewish woman who advocated boycotting Israel) anti-Semitic, fuckwad?
By
DOUGLAS BLOOMFIELD \
07/06/2016 20:56
WASHINGTON WATCH: Netanyahu's costly blunders
Netanyahu wanted to increase Israel’s annual military assistance from the current $3.1b. to $5b. in a 10-year aid deal, not including missile defense funding.
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems’ C-Dome system, a sea-based version of the Iron Dome anti-rocket battery, fires from an Israeli Navy missile ship. (photo credit:screenshot)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to follow a course of confrontation over cooperation with US President Barack Obama may wind up costing Israel $10 billion or more in defense assistance over the next decade.
Through a combination of partisan meddling in US politics and unrealistic demands, the prime minister is putting in jeopardy ongoing negotiations for a new and – for Israel – beefed up Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on aid.
Netanyahu wanted to increase Israel’s annual military assistance from the current $3.1b. to $5b. in a 10-year aid deal, not including missile defense funding.
Obama was anxious to extend the MOU, which expires next year, before leaving office in January to keep a promise to Congress to substantially increase aid to Israel following the Iran nuclear agreement.
Obama wanted Israel’s promise not to try to block the Iran deal, and as a sweetener he offered substantial aid hikes plus an extra squadron of F-35s, the world’s most advanced and most expensive stealth fighter. Netanyahu, convinced he was dealing from a position of strength, refused to negotiate until after Congress dealt with the Iran pact, which he thought he could block. Instead, he chose to declare war on Obama and his Iran policy by making an alliance with Congressional Republicans and leading their failed attempt to scrap the deal.
The self-anointed expert on everything American misread the political landscape in Washington and lost any advantages he may have had in writing a new MOU.
He started out demanding $5b., in part as compensation for the increased danger posed by the Iran deal, and said if Obama wouldn’t agree he’d wait to cut a deal with the next president. He enlisted friends on Capitol Hill to increase pressure on Obama to meet his demands. A bipartisan letter from 83 senators urged the president to agree to a significant but unspecified aid hike.
It might have been very tempting to let Netanyahu wait to see if he could get a better deal next year, but Obama felt he had made a commitment to Congress, said a well-placed administration source.
National Security Advisor Susan Rice told signers of the Senate letter that Israel will get the “largest pledge of military assistance to any country in US history” plus “unprecedented multi-year commitment of missile defense funding.” But she warned that negotiations are taking place in “an especially challenging budgetary environment” and Netanyahu can’t get everything he wants.
That is the same message conveyed personally to the prime minister by top Republicans like Speaker Paul Ryan and Sen. Lindsey Graham, who chairs the Senate panel that writes foreign aid spending bills, and by AIPAC. Cut a deal with Obama now, don’t wait for his successor, they advised. That was echoed by Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman and Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon.
Ignore them, recommended David Friedman, Donald Trump’s real estate lawyer and Israel adviser. He told Israel’s Channel 2 News that Netanyahu should wait for his boss to become president because then aid to Israel “will go up” and “won’t be small.”
It is unknown whether the prime minister is getting similar advice from his friend and financial backer Sheldon Adelson, who has pledged $100 million to help elect Trump.
The foreign aid bill now before Congress includes $3.1b. in grant aid for Israel – more than for all other countries combined – and nearly a quarter of that ($815.3 million) is for Israel to spend at home on defense procurement plus another $400m.
primarily for jet fuel. No other country gets such a deal, which dates back to the 1980s, and the administration wants to phase it out. It no longer serves the best interest of both countries, said Rice.
Israel’s defense industry no longer needs to be propped up and that money should be spent in the United States, like the rest of the aid to Israel and other countries, in the administration’s view. With Israel being one of the world’s largest arms exporters, this provision subsidizes Israeli firms that are in direct competition with American firms and takes away American jobs, argues the White House.
Obama also wants the 10-year MOU to include funding for special programs like the Arrow, Iron Dome and David’s Sling missile defense projects, which are currently negotiated separately every year.
What Israel is asking would “deplete” the Pentagon’s own missile defense funding, said an administration official. If Netanyahu gets the $5b. he wants for military aid, there would be nothing left for any other country. Congress has been loathe to vote increases in non-Israel aid (a popular political wedge issue) and increases will be less likely next year when Speaker Ryan and Republicans plan to seek significant domestic spending cuts.
The administration wants to lock in the aid levels set in the MOU while Netanyahu sees them as starting points to lobby Congress for increases.
In recent weeks talks have accelerated with Netanyahu apparently listening to the advice of friends in Washington and colleagues in his cabinet. Knowledgeable sources say there is no chance Israel will get the $5b. a year Netanyahu initially demanded, and in fact the deal, which could be concluded this summer, will come in close to the original Obama offer of $3.7b., the source said.
Netanyahu’s failure to take advantage of the opportunities presented early last year before the Iran battle, his meddling in American partisan politics and his threat to wait for the next president to meet his demands backfired on him.
Netanyahu gambled and lost on the Iran deal, and his poor judgment may wind up costing Israel $10b. over the next decade in lost aid increases and other benefits.
And that doesn’t include the damage he has done to support for Israel from liberal Jews, the Congressional Black Caucus and a growing number of progressive Democrats who are starting to rebel against AIPAC’s partisan-tinged version of pro-Israel fealty.
Yeah, the Cock Hound is doing a bang-up job of rounding up support with his biggest allies, ain't he?Shush()*
hno::think2:
Mr. Netanyahu’s Holocaust Blunder
By
THE EDITORIAL BOARD NEW YORK TIMES OCT. 22, 2015
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Credit Fabrizio Bensch/Reuters The claim by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel that a Palestinian persuaded Adolf Hitler to exterminate the Jews of Europe is outrageous.
It is outrageous because the Holocaust is far too terrible a crime to be exploited for political ends, especially in the state linked so closely to the tragedy of the Jewish people. It is outrageous because the only apparent purpose is to demonize the Palestinians and the current leader of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, and to give the impression that their resistance is based solely on a longstanding hatred of the Jews, and not on their occupation by Israel or any other grievance. And it comes at a time of
renewed tension in Israel, with a wave of lone-wolf attacks on Jews by knife-wielding Palestinians.
The Israeli prime minister’s assertion before the World Zionist Congress on Tuesday was not the first time he has alleged that Haj Amin al-Husseini, a grand mufti of Jerusalem, Arab nationalist and zealous foe of Zionism, was one of the instigators of the Holocaust. This time, however, Mr. Netanyahu went further and absurdly portrayed Mr. Husseini as the decisive voice in persuading a purportedly wavering Hitler to exterminate the Jews. While it is a fact that Mr. Husseini met with Hitler in 1941 in search of support, only a handful of fringe historians have claimed, with no evidence, that he planted the idea of the “final solution.”
Mr. Netanyahu knows better. As an experienced politician, he is aware of the emotional impact of having a Palestinian say the words he attributed to Mr. Husseini, when asked by Hitler what to do with the Jews: “Burn them.” Mr. Netanyahu’s evident intent was to drive home the idea that the current wave of violence has been incited by Palestinian leaders. Palestinian attackers have murdered at least eight Israelis in multiple attacks and more than 50 Palestinians have been killed, including about 20 said to be involved in the attacks and the others in clashes with Israeli security forces. Mr. Abbas and other Fatah leaders not only have failed to denounce the knife attacks, but have made comments that seemed to fan the violence and even celebrate the killers. This month, Mr. Abbas, reacting to a viral video, accused the Israelis of shooting a
13-year-old boy “in cold blood” and leaving him to die when he was in fact recovering in a hospital.
Even with this heightened anxiety, there was fierce reaction in Israel to Mr. Netanyahu’s comment about the Holocaust, which was probably far from what he expected. His defense minister, Moshe Yaalon, said that “history is actually very, very clear” that Hitler “initiated” the Holocaust and that “Haj Amin al-Husseini joined him.” The Germans, who received Mr. Netanyahu in Berlin on the day after his comments, made that same point on his arrival.
Secretary of State John Kerry
called for an end to the violence when he met with Mr. Netanyahu in Berlin. But for that to happen, Mr. Abbas and the Palestinian leadership must make clear that these terrorist attacks are unacceptable, and both sides must accept that real peace cannot be achieved without a two-state solution.
Mr. Netanyahu has made some efforts at damage control since the speech, but all have only reinforced the impression of a cynical effort to distort history in order to draw a straight line between Mr. Husseini’s Nazi views and the current Palestinian leadership. The Holocaust is not a history to tamper with, and now that he has heard the anguished outcry from people who understand that, Mr. Netanyahu should have the decency to acknowledge that he was wrong and out of line.