Mls 2014

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Starting from preseason this year, already won first bet with Portland +0.5 yesterday, but forgot to post it. Anyway, preseason will be a good place to begin and achieve some important goals:
1) See new/transfered players in action. There were a lot of movement this offseason.
2) Make some easy bets. Bad lines, good spots. Won't be anything special, since limits are poor, but it won't hurt either. 5Dimes, B365 and others offer lines, and Pinnacle should join them for "cup" matches.
3) Prepare some mid-long term "strategies" for start of the season. Fading Toronto, especially with new superstar odds, already sounds profitable. It's a world cup year, so it's going to be a unusual ride for many teams. Some can fail their preparation, some can find their goals conflicting with players goals to be in top shape and not get injured. Many veterans won't want to play that insane schedule of 3 games per week (from hot to cold weather, from good to bad fields). Also, there are some things I wanted to try last season but it was too late to start.

Link to previous thread and results:
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=952997


Link to preseason schedule:
http://www.mlssoccer.com/news/articl...5-matches-live

February 5th is the date of first game.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Columbus-Malmo
Line is in sync with my expectations, so hopefully there will be better odds somewhere. Trust in Malmo to win should be based on something, these are reasons for me:
1) Malmo is a better squad. They were the best team on the road in domestic league, and they have pretty much the same roster as last year. So few if any new pieces (some yonger guys are from their youth teams). They had a great chance to win in first game vs New England but couldn't capitalise on their chances. They didn't substitute whole roster, so they care about game, not just fitness+practice for everybody.
2) It's tough to perform well in first game, not many players are ready to play. So Malmo in their second game should have an advantage over Columbus, playing their first. Malmo friendlies history kind of confirms it, with first games (they had some vs US teams) almost always being a draw, and further results being much better.
3) Main reason. Columbus looks very suspicouis. A lot of key guys left the club one way or the other. They are rebuilding and have a new coach to lead this process. It's always a possible disaster in the making. "Berhalter was fired on July 24, 2013 for a lack of offense" Wasn't that the key problem for Columbus last year? Counting on Oduro and Higuain was never a good plan. But even bigger problem is their defence. GK + top2 defenders are gone, they brought Parkhurst and bunch of yougnsters. Some young forwards surprised last year, but not so many young defenders can say the same. Plus they haven't made moves they wanted to, and they have problems on the right side (if Parkhurst play there, they got 2 young rookies starting at CD?). And they going to change tactics too. So there's a little chance this team will be good or consistent defensively.
So a team like that, with questionable fitness and new everything, will go against a more talanted and experienced team. I like my chances to fade them now and look for confirmation to bet against their defence in future games.
1212 Malmo (ClubFriendly)* -½ -123 1.813 vs Columbus (ClubFriendly)
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Malmo to win
Score: 0-1

Undeserved, but liked what I saw. About 7 chances only in first half and two pk situations. Defence was collapsing in every way possible.


Other interesting thing was how Seattle played. I really like what they've done this offseason, and how they're trying to play. Implementing blueprint of other teams success is part of being winning organisation. So Seattle and LA looked at league and themselves, and added target men. There were more than enough examples of teams being succesfull by dominating air last season. Dallas had insane start, mostly due to incredible amount of set piece goals. SKC playoff run was fueled by set piece goals and headers. I don't know how much LA will use it, but Seattle upgraded mightily. They now have Cooper, who is a much better fit with Obafemi, and great presence in the air. Dempsey behind them, two super fast wingers to create crosses. They now got Marshall to add threat and Pappa to take free kicks. Anibaba can throw it into the box (which led to goal today). So in terms of being dangerous in the air and on set pieces, Seattle is now among the best and added something they lacked last season. There's much more to improve in other areas, but this will be especially usefull at home, against parked buses. West should be weaker this season, and most teams play defensively at Seattle anyway.
 

New member
Joined
May 2, 2010
Messages
11
Tokens
Looking forward to this Exar. Thanks for posting your insights. I'm curious as to why you are so quick to dismiss TFC's chances this year. They look to greatly improve from my (biased) perspective.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Looking forward to this Exar. Thanks for posting your insights. I'm curious as to why you are so quick to dismiss TFC's chances this year. They look to greatly improve from my (biased) perspective.
I'm not dismissing their chances, if anything, rich(er) clubs rule soccer. But with all their spending, they haven't fixed their 2 main problems: coach and attacking creativity of their midfield. Most valuable and underestimated positions in the league imo, and they have got 0 players there. So these two problems will be in place again, since team just haven't addressed them. Preseason will help to understand how they are going to play, but I don't think their flaws (especially on offence) will allow them to play on level of their "high expectations" odds.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
wow, can't say i agree with that assessment at all ExeR. First of all when you sign two class strikers like Defoe and Gilberto you're pushing further up the field and unclogging the midfield. Then you add DeRo, even at his advanced age, and Michael Bradley and you have instant ability and creativity in the central midfield. There won't be a more confident and comfortable MF with the ball in this league than Bradley. He'll certainly play deeper than DeRo but there won't be a player anywhere near him in this league that can link the back to the forwards like Bradley. Now you add in Julio Cesar in the pipes and this team is rounding out very nicely...hell, it doesn't take much in the salary-cap MLS to go from bottom to top. I love their trialing Nakajima-Farran...seen him play quite a bit with Canada out wide and he can create from the wings.

no doubt the jury is out on Nelsen but when you talk offensive flaws it shouldn't be due to talent. A group of Gilberto, Nakajima-Farran, Osorio, Bradley, Defoe, and Lambe are more than capable at this level and if Weideman can finally break out, as expected, goals won't be an issue as much as the youthful back line. I, for one apparently, am really interested in this team and can see them challenging for the playoffs
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
wow, can't say i agree with that assessment at all ExeR. First of all when you sign two class strikers like Defoe and Gilberto you're pushing further up the field and unclogging the midfield. Then you add DeRo, even at his advanced age, and Michael Bradley and you have instant ability and creativity in the central midfield. There won't be a more confident and comfortable MF with the ball in this league than Bradley. He'll certainly play deeper than DeRo but there won't be a player anywhere near him in this league that can link the back to the forwards like Bradley. Now you add in Julio Cesar in the pipes and this team is rounding out very nicely...hell, it doesn't take much in the salary-cap MLS to go from bottom to top. I love their trialing Nakajima-Farran...seen him play quite a bit with Canada out wide and he can create from the wings.

no doubt the jury is out on Nelsen but when you talk offensive flaws it shouldn't be due to talent. A group of Gilberto, Nakajima-Farran, Osorio, Bradley, Defoe, and Lambe are more than capable at this level and if Weideman can finally break out, as expected, goals won't be an issue as much as the youthful back line. I, for one apparently, am really interested in this team and can see them challenging for the playoffs
Not much we disagree about after all. You're talking about scheme that puts too much weight on Bradley, so with his talent level he should be up to task. I wasn't questioning talent, so let's say he can. But it implies that Nelsen is capable of making it happen. I have doubts about him and his "strategic" understanding, reasonable doubts. Also, Bradley doing all that work, on already exhausting position. There will be Cups + 3 games per week etc and let's not forget that Nelsen fucking loves pressing like crazy at cold home games. So it's not that he won't be able to do everything, but that it will be box-to-box do everything all the time multiple times a week thing. DeRo playing off him is like 3rd deep forward, he got his long shot and what else. I don't see him as a good facilitator. Always has been a scorer, dribling+speed was shit last year already. I don't know all their guys, some haven't played, but from this long term picture and from what I saw in first foggy game, there's not much positive, where you know it will definitely work.
Plus my main point was that their game probably won't match their odds, not that they're going to struggle. There's more than enough opportunities left to change opinion on this team, but superstar hype and dysfunction in coaching (as MU supporter you know this better than me) and tactics is always a great recipe for a fade.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Starting in less than 10, little late today. Just a small play on
Sporting KC pk vs NYRB @ 2.04 Sbobet
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
SKC won score 1-0
1-1 so far in preseason. Big card today, so let's get to it. Chivas Colorado is the first game, starts in less than an hour, but later with it. Haven't seen them play might skip it all together.
First play of the day is:
Houston Dynamo -vs- Seattle Sounders 1X2 Seattle Sounders @ 2.51 at SBObet
Great preseason so far for Sounders, what can't be sad about Houston. Houston was never in good shape in previous games, so it might be their first real game. But just from attitude stand point, don't see them being as motivated as Seattle. They got off to a great start, they have great style of play for preseason type games and that led them to success. They'll play 2 groups of players today, but that's already reflected in odds. No way these two teams should be equals now, and Seattle got enough depth to deal with it. In the end it may end up being positive.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Last bet for today, should be more watching than betting with these type of games.
Don't get those odds, with Vancouver playing not their best group today. Miller returning, but it's old guy in preseason game, when this was dangerous. SJ flipped the script, finally got their players and fitness back and produced instant result against host Portland team, after struggling in first games. But this was expected, with not the best athletes gathered in this team and playing out of shape. Nothing for them to experiment with, just going to continue their way, while Vancouver has ton of question marks and don't have the style of play to present SJ with problems on either side of the field.
San Jose Earthquakes -vs- Vancouver Whitecaps 1X2 San Jose Earthquakes @ 2.31 at SBObet
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
watched the first half of union game and almost fell asleep.

agree on vancouver, disagree on seattle. saw both sounders and houston this week and sigi has a lot of work to do. hou lost to DC but were better team beaten on own goal and last minute tally. houston already said they expect 75-80' from starters today so that'll be a concern for seattle. tried pulling it up on line but got the "please stand by" mls bullshit
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
ha i'm a dumbass. i saw the game was 2pm on the sounders site but just realized that meant 2pm seattle time, not my time :) game at 5pm est
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
I though a lot about proper way to make a season preview. There is a lot of stuff about it already in the internet, so no reason to make just another opinionated or easy to read thing. Instead of this I decided to use my successful experience with advanced stats in NBA and apply it to MLS. The whole idea is to use stats as indicators of something (usually key weakness or a habit/exclusive feature of the team) and go with thoughts and conclusions from there. It's also much more useful for a betting audience, than regular things with expectations for making playoffs or power rankings. The only expectation I'm looking for is what to bet profitably for/against over/under and why. Not a fan not a hater of any team, so don't really give a crap if anybody making playoffs. It's all injury luck based anyway.
No particular order for this thing, since some teams will be much harder to describe and analyze, and some went through a major overhaul. Transfers will be much easier to describe through prism of "what's team weakness and does this player solve it", than just player on his own. From my perspective, player exists only as a part of a system. And bad "role" or bad system can lead to bad results from talented player and vice versa.
Stats are from squawka, you can browse the site for individual player stats, I have team stats sorted out here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aqm0pJLCxX9BdHk0TjdKRi1McVMtV2J3a2xKcDVaVkE&usp=sharing
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Previews were written some time ago, so there will be some wierd time references. Also, there are things that contradict each other (strong defense and later weak defense), look at details and splits (total can be good, road can be awfull etc). I will modify them as season goes on, this is just a basis and preseason preparation to work on as season goes on.

LA Galaxy vs Real Salt Lake
LA Galaxy Preview
Top team like that won't have a bunch of problems, so their “quiet” offseason is not surprising. Let's take a look at what stats tell about them:
Offence: Top3 offence rating wise, and there's not much separating them from other two teams. A very balanced in distribution too, they enjoyed their success and both open play and set piece goals (16 goals;top 5 in the league). They scored goals inside and outside the box (8 goals; top 4 in the league). They had the most shots inside the box, but didn't have the best accuracy on those. The 3 areas they were average in league are accuracy of shots + conversion of shot on goal passes and goals assisted. All three of those are connected by same thing. They can finish their chances better. There are no problems with creating chances, there is no lack of goals, but when it comes to converting passes from your teammates, Galaxy players weren't among best in the league. But they compensated it with stellar individual talent and great balance.
Possible weakness = Finishing (possibly solved by transfers)
As for chance creation:
Possession: This is where LA was the best team. Especially when you consider the way they play, and adjust their ratings. They were in top3 in total passes, successful passes, and accuracy. Top5 in possession time (but again, it's good for their style of play). Where they really shined was chance creation. They had the most passes leading to shot on goal, and if they were better/luckier with their finishing, they would have most assists. But you combine all those and you have one of the best offensive teams in the league, which created the most opportunities for themselves. Being able to play in variety of ways leaves no worries about Galaxy in these two categories.
Key Strength = Chance Creation
Defense: Here's the interesting part. When you look at their rating, it doesn't strike you as bad (they're 6th), but when you dig dipper all kinds of bad things pop up. But before that, it's time to remember, that they changed their defense during the season. In particular they changed GK from Cudicini to Penedo. This improved them, because Penedo made more as a “defender” in 11 games, than Cudicini did in 21. And Cudicini was only better in all things, that u can let your GK be bad, like throws and kicks. Penedo is worse at that, and not as dominant in the air, but he is much more efficient in diving saves, and he's much safer option and not letting random goals in. Cudicini got no errors to his name, but there were some dumb moves from him that lead to goals, and he allowed the discouraging ones. So by all means that was upgrade in my eyes. As for other positives, this team was much disciplined (fewest total yellow cards; by far fewest yellow cards for tackles) and they were top5 in defensive errors. Those lead to goal in 40+% cases, so the fewer you make, the better. Although, the yellow card total can be tricky, and have negative effect. The problem with LA defence was that it was too passive. They didn't get cards for their tackles, but they didn't win the ball either. Only couple of teams was worse than them. They also were at the very bottom with interceptions and blocked shots. The system can be to blame, but it's clear, that they're too passive and don't take chances. You take a look at SKC, who is the team to look at when we talk about defense. They also struggle with some defensive categories, and not much better in blocked shots. But they got 794 to 581 advantage in interceptions, they go after the ball and try to read passes and passing lanes. Besides Colorado nobody is that bad in both (but Rapids shine in duels won and other categories), and only very bad teams are as bad in interceptions. So this is their problem, but main one is this:
Key weakness = Road defence
Only Seattle has more of a drop, between home and road defense rating wise. But when you find yourself in company of DC, San Jose and Toronto, it’s too much to overcome, even for one of the best road attacking teams. This is ongoing story for them, and they regressed last year. They were insanely good at home, but when they hit the road the team completely changed. Perhaps their passive effort is to blame here, because you need those duels and interceptions when you play in away game. Home team is always more aggressive, more poised to go and get the goal. They allowed 28 of 32 goals inside the area and 10 of 11 headed in away games. Bottom 3 in duels won. Absolute worst in shots blocked. 6 of 7 errors happened in away games. 2 of 3 cards for arguing and 22/36 yellow cards. Just not enough commitment and desire from this team to play in hostile environment.
Transfers: http://www.lagalaxy.com/news/2014/02/experience-additions-key-la-galaxy-they-hope-recapture-mls-cup .
Among those who left club, most players are midfielders. None of them played key role in their offence in both goal scoring and playmaking. So main pieces are still with team, while these players absence won't be a big hit to a team, plus it might have been a problem, with so many players in rotation. So new players is the key here, and let's see what they bring to the club:
-Baggio Husidic http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Y0UsU5NN9Q
All around guy for midfield, with so many midfielders gone he can add some depth and be a useful veteran and link between defense and attacking players (something LA can use, since they got too much clearances of the ball, instead of being able to play it out)
-Samuel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKE-1u0fJBM
That's the key one, with question marks in finishing, they can use a player like that. It also gives them another dimension, since he's strong and tall forward. They were in the middle of the pack in headers, so this can move them to the top of the league. This looks like a very nice move, and exactly what they needed to cover their possible weakness and become even better on offense.
-Rob Friend http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdfDHSATkM0 .
Pure target striker, another step to improve their offence and add some air presence. I may be wrong on this one, but he will be situational starter, since he doesn't fit others that well. But it's a smart move from a team, like some others trying to "steal" scheme of success and add players who can score from set pieces and headers. This was a recipe for success for teams like RSL and SKC, and now the gap between Galaxy and them in this category is gone.
-Stefan Ishizaki
Winger and chance maker, will create crosses for previous two.
-Two homegrown players.
So, no real improvements on defense, but their moves were great and on point for their already strong offense. They can only hope that full season of Penedo and improvement from guys they already have can help them, but its systemic flaw, and probably won't be solved on it's own.
Preseason: 5-1-1 record so far.
Conclusion: Overs on the road, and fading them in away games should be the long term strategy. It's possible their offence can be insanely good, but their defense wasn't addressed and should have the same problems as they did before.

RSL Preview
Runner-ups and another “no action” offseason.
Offence: 2nd best offence rating wise, 2nd best in set piece goals and tied for 1st in inside the box goals. They were very good with their quality, and they had 2nd best accuracy on their shots. Quality, quantity and balance. If you have to pick one, this will be your choice. No real weak spots, converted what they had.
Defense: Mediocre at this side, team was juts 11th. Protecting their own box was the big problem for them. 38 goals inside the box, and they weren't particularly good in duels. Headers were their main problem, where they were tied for bottom 3 (only Chivas was worse). As a direct result, they had 11 headers scored against them.
Key weakness = Defense on 2nd floor
And this can be even bigger problem this season. With so many teams reconstructing their rosters to have aerial presence, and some teams already counting on their set piece production, this weakness can be exposed in almost every game. Seattle and LA just added to already crowded group of teams with everything ready for set piece threat roster wise. All other playoff teams in their conference going to be extremely dangerous, and that's not a good sign for RSL defense.
Possession: Bread and butter, 2nd in rating and first in time of possession. Best accuracy in the league and a shortest average distance of pass. That resulted in by far the most passes both successful and total. They were sixth in shots on goal created, but it may be the result of better shot selection, and it paid off in terms of quality.
Their system allowed them to have some major advantages, and be competitive on the road, without enormous drops in quality:
Key strength = No decrease on defense in away games
Key strength = Road offense
Interesting case, cause possession suffered on the road. But not settling for number 2 paid off. And their road game was right at top, with one of the best differences. Points are not correlated well with it, so SKC earned more, and Portland much less, but really those 3 teams were the kind of guest you don't want at your field. Away offence was fueled by quality (or luck). They relied on outside shots, but where SKC quality failed them, RSL was able to convert those opportunities. 50% accuracy is insane in those conditions, but they passed their way into good shots. Beckerman, Morales, Plata were main contributors, but they were very efficient as a team, and it clearly shows that they had a much more efficient style of offence than SKC in away games. As for defense, they just weren't shy on the road, winning even more duels than at home. Same story with interceptions and pretty much everything else. They were fired up on the road, and it resulted in good performance. They had to deal with more, and allowed more goals obviously, but they had focus and desire to play as hard as at home, and it paid off for them.
Conclusion: That’s the team you want to bet on the road against weaker teams. All their losses came versus team with good in the air (Dallas, Colorado), or versus dominant in possession home teams (LA, NYRB, Montreal, Seattle). There will be more of those teams this season, and their schedule and conference won’t be easy. But when they are versus good matchup, and their weaknesses won’t be exposed, this is the team you want to bet.

Game Preview
With headers being weakness for RSL, and LA improvement on this front, you can expect some extra goals. Plus both teams are capable of scoring in many different ways. Both create a lot of chances and have quality finishers. LA can be very good at home and dominate weaker clubs, but RSL is the rare team you can expect fighting back and not trying to end a game with 0-0 draw. Just like last year they will play open football, and score a lot of goals in most cases.
Over 2.5 @ 2.07 Sbobet
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Dallas vs Montreal
Montreal

Offense: Probably surprising for most, but this is the top team in offensive rating. It shows how good they used what they had. Especially, how spectacular Di Vaio was for them. They had league worst 3 headed goals, and were mediocre on set pieces. They ended up with a very few goal scoring chances, but they used them well. It resulted in best accuracy of shots: 52%, while no other team had more than 50%. When you have that kind of quality of finishing, you don’t need a lot of chances. And that was the story of their offense last year. It’s not optimal and this structure backfired in crucial moments, but none the less:
Key strength = Quality of finishing (aka Di Vaio)
Di Vaio was the main creator of this success, and his accuracy was insane at 62%. The only bad thing that can be said about him is that he shot too much from outside, and that resulted in just two outside goals. But if you allow him to get the ball inside the area, it’s over. 18 goals on 65 shots, basically every 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] shot on goal from him turned into goal.
Defense: Mirror image of offense, where they have to deal with a lot, and despite doing fine job, result was poor and they allowed a lot of goals. Defenders aside, volume of opponent’s chances always comes from problems with midfield. Bernier was their only defensive midfielder, with other guys more focused on offense. But not just that, it’s that he was the only impactful guy out there. All other guys had very weak scores, were out of top30 among midfielders. Whatever the formation/system flaws can be, they just didn’t have the players to contain opposition. That resulted in heavy duty for their defenders. The type of duty they couldn’t handle. Their defensive core of Camara Ferrari Nesta Brovsky were top35 or lower in defensive rating. It’s not the full picture, as they were top10-15 in total rating (with Ferrari being best in possession), but you certainly want this the other way around. Camara participating on offense and scoring some unexpected goals is nice, and Nesta+Ferrari calmness in ball control is good, but you are dealing with high amount of defensive situations, you need to be good at them first and foremost. Camara was very active in duels, he was 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] in the league, but all other guys were not up to it. Nesta and Ferrari didn’t sign up for physical defense (especially Nesta, with injury problems). Brovsky was leader in tackles, but he lack size and headers were not his strength. Ferrari was productive in awareness categories, where he was 8[SUP]th[/SUP] and 7[SUP]th[/SUP] in interceptions and blocked shots respectively. Camara and Brovsky were in top 25 in total actions, so problem was not with them. Nesta as a defensive anchor and coordinator was the main problem. There can be thousand reasons for personal blame, from him being old and injure prone, to plain unwillingness to participate in defensive actions. But to me it’s a systemic flaw in their game plan. You want him to be there and take care of the ball, tell directions and command his guys. Fine, he will do it effectively. But you are dealing with defensive work delegation from midfield, and you have a guy who is opposite of what you need, with no acceleration or desire to fight for ball and no ability to run at guys to make a stop with foul and kill opponent’s chance. Instead what was Montreal routine, is that they were backpedaling, allowing opponents with man advantage come at them, and then they covered initial guy, but nobody was guarding extra guys. So you would regularly see Nesta covering and stopping one guy, while the bounce was recovered by free opponent. If he’s against multiple opponents, he will stuck somewhere in between, trying to force opponent into mistake, but not really doing anything. Example of this (1:00-3:30):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCrTOIZ4820
You can see the whole chain of failures in Montreal’s defense. Midfield loses the ball, don’t run back and don’t try to cut anybody. Everybody is just back pedaling, and Nesta is looking on play’s development and trying to be in the thick of things. But most of the time he’s just stuck in no man’s land or he doesn’t has enough acceleration to be able to get into position and challenge offensive player.
Key weakness = Dysfunctional defensive system and wrong player roles
Possession: Not bad overall, as they had 7[SUP]th[/SUP] rating top5 accuracy and top5 in total/successful passes, but playmaking was a problem. It’s good to have high possession score among defenders, but they can pass ball to each other all they want, it won’t result in goals. As for scoring chances, Montreal had big problems, finishing in bottom 7 in shot on goal passes. Already mentioned it in offense description, but it’s a simple equation. The more you have, the better you chances are to score more goals. There is range normal range, if team exceed it you can understand that they are forcing too many shots. Or team is struggling to get enough chances, if they haven’t reached it. Montreal had great quality of finishing, but they were definitely near the low end of range of number of chances.
Key weakness = Playmaking and chance creation
And this is where splits confirm that statement. Their offense suffers a second biggest drop in the league in away games. By far the top offense at home turns into 9[SUP]th[/SUP] on the road. Just 19 of 50 goals, just 15 of 43 inside the box goals. And six of those were from set pieces. They got almost nothing from open play, and everything connected to goal scoring has dropped mightily on the road. With pretty much the amount of passes it was clear, that midfield was failing to deliver, while Di Vaio was usually the lonely warrior upfront. No one from midfield was in the top30 in shot on goal passes in away games. Morales from RSL had 3 times more of those, than Mapp or Bernier. Nobody on Montreal is really a playmaker, and the system they played badly needed one. With no playmaker they were doomed to wait for bad preparation and mistakes from opposing defense to achieve something.
Transfers: Nesta is gone, but the problem on his position still exists. Montreal is in negotiation with Heath Pearce at the moment, but I don’t know if he is the right guy. He was not impressive for NYRB last year, and this team doesn’t really need aerial presence (Pearce’s strength). I don’t know what drafted guy can bring, but they clearly haven’t addressed this problem, or don’t know it exist. Their midfield has double trouble, so changing Arnaud for other guys won’t solve both. Ofcourse healthy Bernardello can be a game changer for midfield, but won’t solve everything. System will be much healthier, with 4-2-2-2 formation, but this still leaves 2 questions. What about playmaking, if they will go with 4-2-2-1-1 (Felipe playing under Di Vaio)? And who will benefit from wing players on this team if they stick with 2 forwards. The Gonzalez kid is speedster, and Di Vaio is not the guy to cross to. I would like to think that defense will improve, but preseason games haven’t confirmed that so far. Although I like the formation and style of play changes they made, it still leaves question marks about offense, but at least there defense won’t be so exposed. And who knows, maybe Bernier helping from midfield will be a good thing for their attack.

Dallas
Offense: Up and down season for this team and it shows in stats. 12[SUP]th[/SUP] in offensive rating. They had the most set pieces goal in the league with 21, and it was almost half of their goal total. 12 headers, good for top3 in the league. So it’s clear that they had very few options besides set pieces and crosses. They had just 5 outside goals, and it’s a tie for 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] worst in the league. Very ineffective on outside shots, they didn’t have quality or quantity, and they had bad structure. Relied too much on individual actions, which you can’t do unless you posses RSL like players to finish the plays with great quality.
Key weakness = One dimensional offense
Maybe Dallas self-destructed, but you can’t deny that further into season teams were able to figure them out. It’s what happens when you have one dimensional offence, and they struggled in the end of the season, when everybody knew how they score.
Defense: 4[SUP]th[/SUP] worst rating, 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] worst in allowing goals inside their box. Only 7 of 48 were headed, so opponents were mostly scoring on close chances. This tells a lot about defense allowing them to do so. With exception of headers, this defense was a bad as Chivas one. Discipline was bad, so all around not a great effort. Or maybe they were just overpowered? Thing is you can’t blame defenders here. Their midfield is the root of all evil. Both defensive oriented guys were outside of top35 in defensive ratings. Other than that, people were just not participating in anything, having 0 and negative ratings. Not only that this was a horrible bunch in possession. Everybody except Jacobson had negative possession rating. So we are talking about group of guys who not only didn’t participate in defense, they did their best to help opponents with man advantage attacks, giving them ball 24/7. All of this translated onto extra pressure on defense, which wasn’t all that bad. Hedges was the best guy in the league in all around rating, top10 in defense and 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] in possession. Michel was good, Loyd was in the mix for competent guys. They were in top25 in duels, and Hedges was best in defensive actions. So you can’t blame them for not being able to compensate for themselves and the other guy. And there were a lot of other guys.
Key weakness = Terrible defensive participation from midfielders
Possession: Already mentioned poor ability of their midfield in ball control. Not a single positive, club as a whole was mediocre at best, with low tota/completed passes. As a result, not enough chances and no control of the game, even when they had an opportunity. This lead to terrible road game (where they were dominated) and poor results vs teams with weak possession game. They didn’t have anything good upfront, so their road possession was among the best. It was not good, but they were basically playing the same game. Defenders took care of the ball, while guys on offence did whatever the hell they wanted. It hasn’t affected their possession rating, but it backfired on defense, as they were outmatched and outnumbered in away games. Their road defense was the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] worst in the league, and the numbers confirm that they were just outmanned in most cases. 29 of 48 goals inside the box were allowed on the road, while real defenders stats like interceptions and blocked shots didn’t decrease at all and were intact with home numbers.
A great example of all these is away game at LA. Look how many times Hedges make saving plays, and look at attack by LA started at 2:20. Overlapping run forcing defender to change position, while no one from midfield is even trying to catch their guy. At 4:20 you can see Sarvas at the side of the screen. He’s running alone for 13 seconds, and end up being uncovered and finishing this attack with the goal. 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] goal is the same, midfielders just gave up and watching how LA score easier than at practice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu9iyDh_gBc
Transfers: Coaching change and all kind of transfer moves. Midfield was reconstructed, so only projections about how this will work out. They brought in Hendry Thomas, who played under new coach in Colorado and he should be an upgrade. Other than that, mostly prospects, so some old pieces are still there and not enough depth in this midfield. Hard to imagine them being any worse than year before, but won’t be an instant change to good either. They brought some forwards to give them extra options on offense. So all in all, problems were addressed. But how it’s going to work out is yet to be seen.

Game Preview

Dallas hasn’t shown anything, and there can only be hope that their new midfield will perform better and play on both sides of the field. Montreal saved the same bunch, eliminated “weak” chain, added healthy Bernardello and more defensive approach. They never had problems with headers, so it’s very strange to see them here as an underdogs. I’m pretty sure Dallas will need time to make everything work right, while Montreal can build on last year’s success and learn from their mistakes. Not sure if they’ll be able to overcome away offensive struggles, but it’s not a problem since draw is offered at a very generous price.
Montreal +0.5 @ 1.96 Sbobet
Under 2.5 @ 1.84 Sbobet
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Portland-Philadelhpia
Portland

Offense: 4[SUP]th[/SUP] in rating, 7[SUP]th[/SUP] in set piece goals, top4 in inside the box, top3 outside the box. Great balance from this team, and you couldn’t predict, that they were capable of doing it. But they did it with quality. With not so many chances created, they were among the best in making them count. And it’s what expected of Porter’s system, with calm control of ball, high quality pressing and fast counters. They didn’t force the issue, and tried to create good opportunities. And with mid to low volume of chances, they were able to get 6[SUP]th[/SUP] accuracy, 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] most assists and great ratio of assisted goals and assist/shot on goal passes.
Key strength = Balance, shot selection and good quality of finishing
Defence: 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] in goals allowed, but just 5[SUP]th[/SUP] in defensive rating. Can’t say the lucked out, since their road point total was way lower, than it was supposed to be with their goal difference. But maybe the way their season went is to blame. There were many games, especially in early games, where they felt behind by 1 or 2 goals and fight their way back to draw. And it’s up and down season not only for team, but for every individual and every line in their formation. They were very good at their own box, won good amount of headers. But their defense was lacking. It was well hidden behind their pressure and strong midfield presence, but time to time their defenders were exposed, and it hasn’t usually end well. And it’s not surprising, since only one of them was in top40 individually. Very low amount of interceptions and low amount of blocked shots are indicators of that. They also had a very high amount of clearances and errors. But their style of play and great quality of midfield allowed them to have pretty good defense overall. All their key midfielders were in top15 in defensive actions, and some of them improved in playoffs. So it’s a weird situation, but I’ll describe it like that:
Key weakness = Weak individual skill of defenders
Key strength = Top defensive midfield in the league
Possession: 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] in rating, 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] in time of possession, 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] in successful passes, top5 in accuracy and 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] in total passes. It’s obvious that it’s one of the top teams in term of ball control, and they led the group of “quality first” teams thanks to their dominating style. Montreal and NYRB had seen ball much less, but those 3 were very selective with their shot selection and type of chances they want to get.
Split of home and away games show one are, where they struggle. It’s their defense. 22 of 33 goals, all goals from outside the box happened in away games, and 5 out of 7 headers. 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] most fouls and fewer duels won. They were beyond top10 in interceptions and blocked shots (and that resulted in out of box goals). They made fewer mistakes at home, but when you add everything up, it’s clear, that it’s a negative result of their road style of play. Being too safe, giving too much space for opposition and trying crowd the box haven’t worked out well. This is where midfield had too much load, dealing with control of the ball, defensive activities and other stuff. With pressure of decision making on defenders, they just collapsed and did the safest thing possible. The second goal from Vancouver is a prime example (starts at 4:50):
http://www.mlssoccer.com/matchcenter/2013-05-18-van-v-por/recap
10 people surrounding one guy and blocking vision for their goalkeeper, while the guy with the ball all alone and has all the time in the world to make quality strike.
Key weakness = Passive away defense
But it wasn’t all bad. Their offense stayed on same level in away games and their possession was the key to their game again. Both good for best rating in the league.
Key strength = Away offense and possession
So at least they even it out, but that ended up in insane amount of away draws for them.
Transfers: A lot of movement for this club so only key ones and short:
Jean-Baptiste was the only key guy from defenders who left. The brought in Villafana and Paparatto, which is not only +man, but also a bump in quality. So Timbers addressed their defensive problems, increasing quality and number of competent guys.
Johnson and Valencia are key offensive players that left. None of them is a big loss, since they were out of top 20 in rating, and they acquired much more experienced and talented Gaston Fernandez. As a team, they are set on their style and decided not to go for change of style like LA and Seattle did. Their system doesn’t require athletic guys, so this was a good fit. He can add creativity on offence, since last year their forwards were pretty much locomotives. Now they have guy who can fake shots, play “one step ahead” type of game, which will be useful against some of defenders in this league. Some tricks from Di Vaio arsenal (but not saying they’re same). He’ll be their set piece/penalty taker too, with Johnson still taking straight free kicks. But it’s still on paper, because I haven’t seen anything close to projection from him in preseason. It’s understandable, new surrounding and preseason and all that stuff. But he’s still playing too tight, very few creative moves. Maybe while he’s figuring out the system, simplicity of it dominates his mind. He moves freely but linear actions and his pass first mentality is not what he should be doing. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not like he’s a bust or doesn’t look like he belongs, but he should be doing different kind of actions imo. But overall, I like what they did, and Fernandez is player of great quality and should be fun to watch.

Philadelphia
Offense: 9[SUP]th[/SUP] offensive rating, once again a team that survived on set piece goals. They scored 17 of those for 4[SUP]th[/SUP] result in the league. But other than that, things were not great for Union. 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] worst 4 outside goals, and not a lot of goals in general. They had bad accuracy on their shots (42%). They created good amount of chances, but not enough to cover up for bad efficiency of finishing. It’s also reflected in percentage of assisted goals. Phily lead the league with almost 81%, so playmaking wasn’t the problem, finishing was. Their offensive core of Le Toux, McInerney and Casey wasn’t among the top offensively and their possession rating was horrible. So when you don’t provide them with assists, it was tough for them to create something for themselves.
Key weakness = Weak individual skill of attackers
Defense: Mediocre rating and goals allowed. But this was a surprise for me, since I though they struggled defensively in different areas. It turns out, their main weakness was headers. They allowed league worst 12 headers, and it’s not surprising. Their aerial duels won % was among the lowest, and opponents used that well. They also committed a lot of fouls, which allowed opposition to exploit set piece situations. 5 goals came from corner kicks. Other than that they were very good, just 4 outside goals, great in tackles, interceptions and blocked shots. But when it came to protecting box on crosses, they were not good. That, and defensive mistakes, that lead to 5 goals, were their main weaknesses.
Key weakness = Defense on the 2nd floor
Possession: Already mentioned it about their attackers, but whole team as a whole was bad at possession. Bad rating, low time of possession, low accuracy, low amount of passes. It only adds to their ability to create chances on offense, with such possession numbers. Midfield wasn’t any better than strikers, with most of the guys having negative numbers. Somebody should stand out on a team built like that, but nobody really did. They need 1-2 guys to be able to pick up tha slack for others. But as things stand, Union players were not interested in controlling the ball well and nobody was the go-to guy.
Key weakness = Weak ball control from whole team
This was a big problem on the road. With regular drops in offense and defense between home and road games, possession dropped to bottom of the league numbers. You don’t want to give already motivated home team all the time they want with the ball. And even with their road record being descent, this is not the way to play on the road for them. Especially with weaknesses on defense, opponents can just overpower their defense with sheer number of chances created.
Transfers: They’re thinking of playing 4-3-3 so they made a major reconstruction of midfield. It’s good, since it will address their possession problems. And signings of Edu, Nogueira and Maidana will definitely help their case. Trading up for Blake in draft was reflection of what they think about MacMath. They need a more consistent guy but I’m not sure if they’ll make hime number 1 from get go. Anyway, no real problems with GK so moving on. On defense they changed Parke for Berry. Doesn’t seem like an upgrade. He was worse in the air, and the only advantage he had last season was in interceptions. Also Berry made 3 errors leading to 2 goals. With headers being the problem, degrading them doesn’t seem like a good plan. No changes in attack, we’ll see how they perform with much improved midfield. Bringing quality passing guys can improve their offence, as they survive on assisted goals. Maybe they won’t need to do anything individually to have success.

Game Preview
Philadelphia is in worst possible situation to start their season. Preseason showed, that they still need time for this midfield to figure everything out. Going to Portland to play one of the toughest possible opponents won’t be a positive experience for them. Portland won’t allow them to control the ball and it should be a big problem, since strikers don’t possess enough skill to create lots of chances on their own. I see Portland dominating this game, and Phily having tough time creating anything on offence. 1-0/2-0 score sounds legit, but I will bet them as side bets, with main bet being:
Portland -0.75 @ 1.71 Sbobet
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Seattle vs SKC
SKC:
Champs, and another quiet offseason.
Offense: Just the 10th rating, but they win their games on other side of the field. Still' it's a warning sign and they should have some weaknesses. They are tied for 5th with 16 set piece goals, scored league leading 14 headers. They had top5 shots from both inside and outside the area, so the question is why the hell they are below average team. Well it's their accuracy. They are tied for third worst accuracy.
Key weakness = Shot accuracy & Shot selection
Midfield is to blame here, nobody was contributing well. With so many shots outside area, it looks like SKC players used any opportunity to strike the ball and be the hero. Only Feilhaber was somewhat decent with it (and only Bieler among forwards), all others were just wasting possession. Zusi and co did it way too much and it resulted in pitiful 6 goals outside of the box, only 5 teams did worse. So it's clearly wasn't worth it. You can look at better teams here, who were able to knock down more outside goals. But really it's a very slim difference, and mostly based on free kick goals. Camilo did that for Vancouver last year, so if they don't have it they don't need to push it. NYRB can be a good example of different approach: they had the lowest volume of outside shots, but scored just as much. And their efforts to get better opportunities resulted in 10 more goals inside the box for them. This can be the way to play for SKC, but it won't probably happen for a team after championship. They'll be happy to get it with volume and bad structure.
Another weakness pops up when you split home and away games:
Key weakness = Away offense
Like LA falls apart on defense, SKC does exact same transformation with their offence. Biggest drop in the league by far. It moves them from best home offense to just 11th on the road. Their life line was scoring headers, as they knocked 9 of 14 in away. Other than that they had just 10 open play goals and just 1 outside the box. That's where they really hurt themselves, trying to score from outside and almost as many shots in and outside the box. With just 1 goal to show for it, and almost 50 less passes leading to shot their offense was just not playing right. At times they seemed ok with being number two and weak execution of what they had. Too focused on defense, I guess.
Defense: Not much to say here, best in the league, fewest goals, very good inside their box. They commit a lot of fouls, but they don't allow anything easy, and it works as a fear factor for many opposing teams. They win the most headed duels in the league, and they intercept by far the most passes.
Key strength = Intensity and awareness of defense
Easy to see why they made no changes, they have experienced bunch willing to play that way. Not much more you can ask for from your defense. They changed GK, so it have some kind of effect. Gruenebaum is much more aggressive in one on ones, so that will be upgrade. Other than that he's downgrade in everything, but he hasn’t played with these defenders, so you can't fully trust those numbers.
Possession Best team in the league rating wise, and a very close to RSL numbers in terms of % of possession (2nd with 53%) and passing. They are not among elite teams in passing accuracy, but they overcome it with volume again. In playmaking department they have 2nd best result, with 342 shot on goal passes (3rd) and 34 assists. Total is good for 2nd in the league in key passes. It's possible to see lack of accuracy as problem, but they have same roster and until they have so much volume of possession and passes, they'll be ok with mediocre quality. So I don't see this being problem for them. After all, teams are copying their formation to play like them, and the key is that you can have mediocre quality, but the style will provide you with enough opportunities to be successful. But split hurts them here too:
Key weakness = Away possession
2nd biggest drop it rating, and from first to 13th. Ofcourse possession and offence connected here and are part of the same problems. But details are: they had very poor accuracy on the road, just 73% (with 81% at home), and as a result they had almost two times fewer successful passes. Time of possession shrink from 56% at home to 51%. And I already wrote about scoring chances drop. So as a team benefiting from volume, and not quality, SKC tendency to play #2 on the road really hurt them. They badly need control of the ball and all that comes with it. Instead they hoped to grind it out with their defense and catch opponent on counters. When they were in trouble, they were forced to shoot it from outside, and if not for set pieces, they would be horrific in road offense. If they won't change it will be their life line again, and it won't work out every time, teams will adjust and be fired up for games against champs.
Transactions:
-Sal Zizzo
Depth to midfield, can help them with increasing accuracy.
-Andy Gruenebaum
This transfer is more of a product of the way this organisation does things. They don't need the best GK to stand behind this defense, so one of the competent guys will do. He will be and upgrade in diving saves and it may come up couple of times during season, because they made quite a lot of errors last year, and he can save some of those.
Preseason:
Conclusion: Unders in away game, and chose the best possession home teams to bet against them. Without volume of chances and weakness in out of box goals and set piece goals from opposition, this team won’t have success. All their losses were against good home possession teams or against teams that fit some of those descriptions.

Seattle
Offence: 13[SUP]th[/SUP] rating, which is quite ridiculous, when you look at their roster. But it was a season of struggle, and a very tough start. But details first: they were mediocre with set pieces, 0 throw ins just 2 from corners. Same story with headers in general, middle of the pack ranking. As for location of the goal, they were dead last in outside of box goals. It can be tricky stat, since you are better off with more inside the box chances. But just 2 outside goals is really poor result, and just 1 was from open play (other was direct free kick). If you look at their shots on goal distribution, they had 13[SUP]th[/SUP] most attempts. So you can’t say their poor production was desired result of their system, as they were accomplishing other things. They shot enough, but had fifth worst accuracy. Their midfield is to blame here with Alonso+Evans+Rosales and later Dempsey taking lots of shots, but showing very bad accuracy. But even forwards, who were striking it better, didn’t achieve much.
Key weakness = Weak on set pieces and weak on outside scoring
Defence: This is where thing were much better. It’s surprising to see them being 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] in rating, as they had tough start and finish to their season, and collapsed multiple times, particularly vs LA (0-4) vs Colorado (1-5) vs Vancouver (1-4). But they were very good in games, where they decided to show up. Details give a better understanding. One of the best teams in fight for the ball, they were top5 in every duel category. They were 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] in interceptions, 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] in blocked shots. These numbers show that their defense was very aggressive. They allowed a lot for stats like those, but midfield did a little to help them and they were forced to be the real stopping power.
Key strength = Activity of defenders and their quality at home.
Possession: First weird case of possession, as team was all over the place with possession. They were 11[SUP]th[/SUP] in in rating, but time of possession and number of successful and total passes were among the best. You can’t really split possession into certain categories and two dimensions, but there must be the reason why volume and quality are moving in different directions. Their accuracy was mediocre, so you can look at individuals to find the problem. Most of the time it’s midfield, but Seattle’s structure tells this: their defenders were the main reason. If you compare them to RSL or some other group, not only their accuracy is much lower, they pass the ball shorter, and they don’t create anything from behind, as their shot on goal passes are almost non-existent. Lots of reasons for that: bad vision, no communication or prepared long ball destinations, or just plain bad passing skill. But problems started there. In midfield, Alonso was the man, providing link between defenders and attackers. 89% accuracy and biggest total of passes from him. After that, problems began again. Playmaking was the key problem for that team, as they failed to create enough goal scoring opportunities. Only 5 teams created less and they didn’t have best quality of finishing. When you don’t have quality, you have to have quality.
Key weakness = Passing of defenders and attacking group
If that’s not enough, here’s more examples of how strangely this team was built, and how inconsistent was their play.
Key weakness = Road offense and defense
The structure of passing is the key to why without major drop in possession, this team was so much worse on offense and defense on the road. Simply built passing game doesn’t require much, and you can play that way on the road too. They were 15[SUP]th[/SUP] and 16[SUP]th[/SUP] in off and def ratings. Just 13 goals, and 5 of them were headers and 4 goals from set pieces. Creating something from open play, and getting the ball to the box was a big problem for this team on the road. This confirms that they have problems with playmaking. Pitiful 93 shots from the box and almost as many outside of it with 35% accuracy. Not enough volume and nowhere near the quality. As for defense, 24 of 36 inside goals on the road, drop in every duel category, fewer interceptions and much more blocked shots. Blocked shots rise and interception decrease tells one thing, that opposition usually had man advantage, and Sounders were running at player and closing out shot trajectory, instead of being in right position. Prime example (starts at 3:20):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as73Z5b0D2M
You can see whole defensive line being in no man’s land. Nobody covering anybody, everybody think they’re covered and think they are covering. And that’s a recipe for disaster; even someone trying to guess and make risky play would be much more efficient. Everybody looks, nobody take action and it resulted in easy goal.
Transfers: Whole offseason was dictated by change of philosophy. It’s a good one imo, since what they tried to achieve addressed their weaknesses. Being weak on set pieces is not cool by any means. You look at finalists; they got there on set pieces. SKC’s run was fueled by them, and both clubs got a big portion of their goals scored that way. Improving is pretty simple, you need takers and you need makers. Preferably you need guys to throw in, since it’s nice weapon and a possible set piece from no foul situation. Seattle had pretty much no one, so they reconstructed team and got both takers and makers. Pappa is there to hit free kicks, Anibaba can throw it into the box, Cooper and Marshall are great upgrades for aerial battles. It’s a very simple process and stealing the success recipe was a smart move from Seattle imo. This already did wonders for them in the preseason, where they not only performed well, but already netted multiple goals from set pieces. So they addressed that weakness and should be much improved and possibly among the best on set pieces. As for other one, Marshal Hurtado exchange makes sense. He’s got the same defensive rating, but a much better possession score. He’s quality passer with good accuracy and length. And he’s one of the best in headers with insane amount and % of aerial duels won. So when you want your defensive to be more carefull with the ball, and not collapse on positioning, acquiring a savvy veteran like that should have a great positive impact. They had a lot of defensive mistakes that lead to goal, so fixing just that can save them some goals, and veterans like Marshal can certainly help with that.
Cooper won’t be a solution for outside scoring, or passing quality increase upfront, but he’s there for other reasons. Their chemistry with Martens looks much better, when what we saw last year, and their new style of play frees up a lot of space for them. It can be beneficial, since both forwards possess great physical ability and can win 1vs1 against almost any defender.
Game Preview
With under killed by odds, inflated home odds are most valuable thing here. Seattle starts with insane odds again. Their weakness in playmaking and passing should be on display. SKC is relying on opponents mistake, and will be more than fine playing #2 here. They have strong full backs to destruct Sounders flank play, and they are one of the best in defending headers. Both team have weapons for set pieces, but both are strong in defending them. I don’t think Seattle will be much improved in passing and open play chance creation right from the start of the season. And SKC is really uncomfortable opponent for them and their new play style.
SKC +0.25 @ 2.05 Sbobet
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
D.C. United Handicap -0.5 for Match 2.240 Pinnacle 0.5u
Crew haven't fixed their possession problem, and it's awful in away games. DC saved all key pieces from last season, and possession was only bright spot for them. They cut all the weak chains, ofcourse they're not at 100% after this huge reconstruction. But I expect them to dominate the ball and get much more of this game. They got some quality veterans upfront, so they should be able to convert them. For Columbus it's up to Higuain and Oduro to carry them. With no support they usually settle for outside or low quality attempts, with Higuain hitting just 30% of his shots. They got just 5 outside goals no 2nd most attempts or something, that's how they play most of the time on the road.
Line is bad for getting value of positive result for DC, only win is good. So I'll risk it with 1/2 stake.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Vancouver Whitecaps/New York Red Bulls Total Over 2.5 for Match 2.130
This is probably best team combination for over @Vancouver, with strong offense and weak defense for both teams. Despite all the rebuilding for a more defensive minded midfield, Whitecaps still haven't shown any desire to play under games in preseason. And I don't think they will change what worked for them so well at home last year. They brought DP from SPain to carry the load offensively. Nobody will dominate the ball, so there should be a lot of mistakes and counters. Even with effect of first game, those odds are still too juicy for this type of matchup.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,797
Messages
13,559,756
Members
100,687
Latest member
kenooo090848
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com