MIT Math Wiz Has Created A Program To Pick Winners for College and Pro Ball

Search

The Program
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
1,969
Tokens
but maybe you can get the odds in your favor..i mean these guys are like hard core math wiz's better than me going on a gut feeling...i'll run with it for a while...they applied the opening lines and said osu is like 80% to hit against -4.5 or less....
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
but maybe you can get the odds in your favor..i mean these guys are like hard core math wiz's better than me going on a gut feeling...i'll run with it for a while...they applied the opening lines and said osu is like 80% to hit against -4.5 or less....


OSU? Are you talking about Oklahoma St?
 

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,538
Tokens
My base numbers are brand new sets of numbers based on points scored last year by players who are returning this year, last years defensive avg ppg, number of returning starters, and a number I plug in for special teams. These numbers cannot be back tested because they are a new base, arbitrary, and may not apply to all teams. However, they may be very relevant, they should be adjustable so as to bring them current by making weekly adjustments based on current statistics as compared to the base numbers (ly's performances). I am afraid that I may have problems with teams where the QB leaves but all the key receivers return and maybe vice versa. If a new QB takes off right away (look how Texas Tech reloads at QB) the numbers may flow right along. I am pretty sure that defensively I account for losing numbers of players but not necessarily the quality of the players although that should be reflected in the avg points allowed per game. After week one I will see what would have happened if I had accounted for All Americans who returned and/or did not return and take a look at the QB/receiver scenarios. In the case say of Memphis/Ole Miss I could see a 25 pt blowout because there are 18 factors involved. Also, the first couple of weeks there are many mismatches (strong vs. weak teams) and that data may only apply to those types of matchups. I am not rushing anything or forcing anything. I am just going to assess the numbers and see if they indicate any kind of predictable performance. This will not be a system. At best it will just make something pop out that might not otherwise have been detected by not comparing the base numbers. But to answer your question you would have to have old rosters, and go over all the statistics for every team for x number of years and account for players who returned and who did not for every one of those years. I do not think that much info is available so I will have to do the trial and error thing. I am not creating a formula I am merely observing numbers to see if they are accurate and can assist in predicting the outcome of certain matchups.

You also must take into consideration things such as schedule changes, when points were scored (in crunch time or in a blow out) a few angles and trends (example: Air Force is 5-0 ATS in their last 5 games at Utah) and other variables, especially with second string players in the skilled positions who may have seen action last year. That is what I try to incorperate into my picks. Last year, Cal defeated Washington and Washington State (combined record of 2-22) by a combined score of 114-10. ust how improtant are those stats, compared to their two games at USC and at Oregon State,(combined record of 21-5) where they were 0-2 and outscored 51-24? It is a guessing game at best, and that is why people have big smiles on their faces at the end of the season if they were able to hit 6 out of 10.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Bqh

You also must take into consideration things such as schedule changes, when points were scored (in crunch time or in a blow out) a few angles and trends (example: Air Force is 5-0 ATS in their last 5 games at Utah) and other variables, especially with second string players in the skilled positions who may have seen action last year. That is what I try to incorperate into my picks. Last year, Cal defeated Washington and Washington State (combined record of 2-22) by a combined score of 114-10. ust how improtant are those stats, compared to their two games at USC and at Oregon State,(combined record of 21-5) where they were 0-2 and outscored 51-24? It is a guessing game at best, and that is why people have big smiles on their faces at the end of the season if they were able to hit 6 out of 10.


The basic ratings are an attempt to get a good grasp of what a team brings to the table in week one or two. I had a posting on here somewhere that I discussed how to pare a teams stats down to become more relevant in competitive situations. I also think too many people on here are concerned with W/L ATS. I am only concerned with winning money. I do a lot of first half and second half bets and when I do that I really don't care who wins that game ATS. LY I bet a lot of first half scores and just moved on. First half and second half bets may be the best bets on the board on week one. Second half bets are expecially interested because you have a better feeling for the flow of the game.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
Gavlam: Can you post the MIT boys simulation results for every game for week 1 in college football.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
computer group - MIT guys - need your help

I just posted some coaching data on my thread. I am thinking that if you could do the same thing with ATS data as opposed to my won lost records there could be some valuable information to be had. Does any body have a data base we could run it through?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
I have results ATS for the past 10 years on college & pro football


Reference the postings on my thread (looking ahead to next season) posts
652 thru 657 and look at those lists of coaches. If someone ran the numbers on those won loss records against your ATS data base it might spotlight something relevent. I can already see a marked improvement for third year coaches over first and second year coaches. There may be some tendencies that indicate betting on or against certain coaches in certain instances. I don't think anyone has ever done that before.
 

The Program
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
1,969
Tokens
they dont want to give out any info....i am getting the impression they dont want me telling anyone their picks! i will anyways because they dont know what the rx is! but yea they said okie state -4.5 looks like the best one...but also that they werent close to finished as they will be working on it all summer to present to like their professors or something...they know my financial situation with lots of school loans and weve been friends for a long time so they are cool with giving me their picks..but i dont think they want me blabbing about them
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
they dont want to give out any info....i am getting the impression they dont want me telling anyone their picks! i will anyways because they dont know what the rx is! but yea they said okie state -4.5 looks like the best one...but also that they werent close to finished as they will be working on it all summer to present to like their professors or something...they know my financial situation with lots of school loans and weve been friends for a long time so they are cool with giving me their picks..but i dont think they want me blabbing about them

Just tell them you will not say anything to anyone. If they are not out to make money, I dont see why it would matter if you were saying anything but since they told you that, dont ever mention you are helping others with there plays. Since they know your situation with your loans & they are your friend, I hope they give you the top plays every week. Lets all win money.
 

The Program
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
1,969
Tokens
yea i guess time will tell....I think I will run with them for 5-6 weeks then if it doesnt work out go back to the gut
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
this kid is full of shit. I can guarantee u that.

Dont be hasty, lets give him a shot & see what his friends come up with & yes, your right about Walters, hes the guy that bet the big money for the group. Michael Kent that wrote the program was just a nerd & needed partners to come in & help him make the bets, so Dr Ivan Lidlin, one of Michael Kents friends & an original member intoduced Michael to Billy & the rest is history. By the way, Michael Kent & his brother still operate in Vegas under a company corporation name & they pay taxes on the winnings they claim.
 

The Program
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
1,969
Tokens
maybe my friends are full of it too...i mean they are up in cambridge mass and i am down here in florida...maybe they are just playing with me...but i will give it a shot
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
I cant wait until football kicks off, this babseball stuff is entirely too boring to watch or wager on.
 

The Program
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
1,969
Tokens
yea it will be nice betting on games where people actually bring it every weekend
 

The Program
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
1,969
Tokens
should be good...they are using player ratings and will delete whoever isnt playing to factor into the program...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,922
Messages
13,575,244
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com