Mista, what about applying these projected scores to the totals. For example the Bears game score above shows 22-10 for a total of 32. Wondering how close these scores have been to the totals, whether over or under the number.
Alright so we are off to a 3-1 ATS start to the week and the PS2 winning ways just don't stop. I enjoyed watching some of the games today and making some cash although watching the Bears and their useless ways was annoying and the defense took quite a hit with injuries, something the PS2 cannot predict so you have to hope for no in-game injuries. Alright guys onto tonight's game.
Sunday, October 12 (Sunday Night)
New England +6
:toast:
I watched this game in its entirety and it wasn't pretty. Cassell did just enough to cover the spread here. Both defenses were pretty damn good and with the defense the Pats have out there, they can win with or without offense. Here we go!
I know I'm gonna take a ton of heat for this but I don't care. Right now it's a method of capping that's working for me, it's the reason my numbers are going to get better and in this world of sports betting you do whatever it takes to have an edge. Right? So don't hate, appreciate my postings.
Bash away and good luck tonight!
Alright so we are off to a 3-1 ATS start to the week and the PS2 winning ways just don't stop. I enjoyed watching some of the games today and making some cash although watching the Bears and their useless ways was annoying and the defense took quite a hit with injuries, something the PS2 cannot predict so you have to hope for no in-game injuries. Alright guys onto tonight's game.
Sunday, October 12 (Sunday Night)
New England +6
:toast:
I watched this game in its entirety and it wasn't pretty. Cassell did just enough to cover the spread here. Both defenses were pretty damn good and with the defense the Pats have out there, they can win with or without offense. Here we go!
I know I'm gonna take a ton of heat for this but I don't care. Right now it's a method of capping that's working for me, it's the reason my numbers are going to get better and in this world of sports betting you do whatever it takes to have an edge. Right? So don't hate, appreciate my postings.
Bash away and good luck tonight!
UPDATE
Here is the problem, the New England loss pissed me off. The PS2 predicted a 21-17 FINAL. Had it had a few more minutes one each quarter I have a feeling San Diego could have covered on PS2. So maybe I am making my games a bit too short. So I woke up this morning at 7 and played around with the settings. When I add a full minute to each quarter here are the results I got each time for this very same game.
San Diego 27, New England 16
San Diego 33, New England 13
San Diego 24, New England 14
Safe enough to say this is still an experiment and the tweaking process is not done. I tried the same setting for the Chicago-Atlanta game and got the following:
Chicago 24, Atlanta 23
So all-in-all I am disappointed to have gone 3-2 ATS on Sunday but the week is not done. The overall record of games I have simulated is very good.
29-6 ATS in NFL and CFB (simulated games)
For those wondering how I pick the games, I have rankings for CFB and NFL and I try to pick the best 6-7 games on the board with nationally televised games too.
:toast: